Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Resolved
- Thread starter adamk77
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Sony and Samsung provide three year warranties. LG provides 12 months.
Not sure if this'll help at all however my Mac mini arrived today, as did my LG27UK600. I've gone from a 5K iMac and am pretty pleased with it all.
Not overly concerned about 12 month warranty, I've never had any issues with LG products in the past.
Not overly concerned about 12 month warranty, I've never had any issues with LG products in the past.
43" monitor? Brave. I have the LG27UK650 (same as the 600 just with an adjustable stand), and is 2 generations newer than the LG you have. No issues with it so far. Works great with my 2018 Mac mini, PS4 and Xbox.
Yes, good to see that three people here haven't had any problems. I suggest you do some broader research. Also, there's a recent YouTube video in which the person who made it talks about how his rather expensive LG monitor bricked it at 14 months, leaving him with no recourse and uneconomic repair options. There is also a participant in this site who says, based on personal experience with LG, that he won't purchase its monitors. Indeed, he posted to that effect within the last ten days.
LG is a popular brand. Personally, I don't think that most purchasers even check warranty periods before buying. LG's warranty is two years shorter than the industry standard. The exception is the two monitors that it makes for Apple. Presumably, those monitors are made to higher quality standards. Just be aware of this, and maybe do some research. My conclusion, after looking at LG's monitors more closely, was "Thanks, but no thanks".
I do know that one participant in this site, who was aware of the warranty issue, addressed it by purchasing third party consumer insurance. That's an option. Some people find that option attractive, others (myself among them) have no interest in trying to resolve a problem with a third party consumer insurance company.
Last edited:
I didn't realise that you'd already made the purchase. Sounds like you got a good price. As you suggest, check your credit card coverage, and maybe see what COSTCO offers in the way of third party insurance.
What you are noticing is the matte coating. It’s nothing to do with the resolution itself. Matte screens make content look grainy and washed out compared to glossy screens like the iMac.
You are screwed, because nobody makes glossy screens anymore besides Apple. Even Dell only makes a few 1080p glossy monitors.
This is the main reason I plan to buy an iMac. I could get a way more powerful PC for the same price, but a glossy screen is worth the extra $ to me.
You are screwed, because nobody makes glossy screens anymore besides Apple. Even Dell only makes a few 1080p glossy monitors.
This is the main reason I plan to buy an iMac. I could get a way more powerful PC for the same price, but a glossy screen is worth the extra $ to me.
Couldn't agree more! I went from a Thunderbolt Display to a BenQ PD3200U (32" 4K) to an HP Z32 (also 32" 4K) and they both looked like crap. My eyes were accustomed to the 'glossy' panel from the TB display. So I sold them and went back to one. They can be had for about $300-400 in good condition on CL. My hope is that Apple finally releases an update to this display later this year.
Having recently worked with Asus's PA32UC display, and its HDR mode in particular, you guys going on about matte vs glossy are in for a hell of a surprise. HDR is coming, and it's coming fast.
Illyama make a 27inch 5K glossy screen. They are currently the only vendor other than Apple that is selling a 5K screen.
It is approx half the price of the LG option...so I don't have a clear idea of the relative quality of the panel.
Here: https://www.scan.co.uk/products/27-...4ms-440cd-m2-80m1-displayportx2-hdmix3-silver
[doublepost=1553764519][/doublepost]
Can you expand on this? In what way does glossy vs matte affect HDR?
[doublepost=1553764701][/doublepost]
I was also a matte proponent. The original wave of glossy MacBook Pro and iMac screens were awful in my opinion due to too much reflection. The glossy screens have improved generation in generation in my view, to the point where I now like the glossy displays on both the MacBook Pro and the 4K and 5K iMac. I currently still use matte screens plugged in to my 2018 mini though, and won't likely replace them until they finally die (currently 8 years old).
Last edited:
You don't need to run a Mac at native resolution to get the benefits of 4K - it scales everything correctly. That way you can have text and graphics elements that are readable but a video will play at 4K. Windows and Linux are still way behind Mac OS in this respect.
Or some of these? 40-43 inch 4K screens
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/40-...000001-2x6w-speakers-dp-2x-hdmi-1x-hdmi-mhl-v
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/43-...0-x-2160-5ms-100m1-hdmi-dp-mdp-white-speakers
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/40-...cd-m2-40001-4x-usb-30-2x-dp-2x-hdmi-vga-2x-5w
https://www.scan.co.uk/products/43-...001-dp-12-hdmi-d-sub-4x-usb-30-audio-in-black
Just keep in mind, LG was for years the bottom of the low end TV brands, and always the lowest price.
Their philosophy of making them fast and selling them cheep is not likely to have changed now that they are in the monitor business.
IMO, LG is not a good long term choice.
No "Silk Purse out of a pigs ear" LOL a2
Their philosophy of making them fast and selling them cheep is not likely to have changed now that they are in the monitor business.
IMO, LG is not a good long term choice.
No "Silk Purse out of a pigs ear" LOL a2
Will that 5K monitor work on a 2018 Mac mini? I know some do and some don't. There was a Philips one that didn't work. I assume you just use two diplayport cables and it's fine?
This would suggest otherwise:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/iiyama-XB2...show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews