Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

seek3r

macrumors 68020
Aug 16, 2010
2,276
3,236
I get that (I'm a programmer) but what I don't get is how regularly this mishap occurs to Apple and how they never seem to see it coming, especially as their entire PR machine is directed at privacy and transparency. At best it shows an incompetent process.

No real answer for you there. Though, honestly, it may just be selection bias. Apple's a lot bigger and under a lot more scrutiny than most other companies, so things that would skate by unnoticed elsewhere get noticed in Apple's case - *especially* because their PR is so about privacy, so in that area they're even more under a microscope.

Or they just could be really bad at catching these things, a systemic problem and it's getting reported more often now ?‍♂️. Hard to tell without more data


So why can't that 2nd list be stored locally on the iPhone?

Probably the same reason your phone doesnt cache the entire DNS structure of the web: they're big lists and they change
 

doboy

macrumors 68040
Jul 6, 2007
3,767
2,936
All this hoopla over nothing, haha. Here's a sobering thought, the apps you use very likely leak more info than this safe list. Heck, your ISP definitely knows more about your browsing habits and they likely sell or use that info. Bottom line, YOU (including me) are not that important or interesting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: iGeneo

Westside guy

macrumors 603
Oct 15, 2003
6,343
4,160
The soggy side of the Pacific NW
I like to bash Apple as much as anyone, when they deserve it. But I’m not sure we should be hammering them for using Google’s Safe Browsing API in the manner it was designed.


Now, one could argue that Apple should write their own protocol and filter these safe browsing queries through their own servers. They’d have to pay Google a pretty penny if they still wanted to use Google’s master list, but Apple could probably dig up that money somewhere. ? However that’s a completely different conversation (and then people would probably complain about Apple collecting addresses...).
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage

jonblatho

macrumors 68030
Jan 20, 2014
2,509
6,194
Oklahoma
So you are just conveniently ignoring Google's collection of safari users data that apple sends directly to Google's servers? The same google that apple has trained their users to be afraid of?
If you’d read the article, you’d see that it’s retrieving a locally cached list of known fraudulent/malicious sites and browsing data isn’t being sent to Google. IP addresses are sent when Safari requests an updated list, but that’s of limited utility for tracking as an IP address is often not linked to exactly one person and will change over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage

nwcs

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2009
2,722
5,262
Tennessee
It’s good that Apple clarified but I think they’re beginning to realize that they need to be in front of these issues and not bury them in obscure sections.
 

StellarVixen

macrumors 68040
Mar 1, 2018
3,177
5,637
Somewhere between 0 and 1
The thing is that with this Apple basically supports everything that China is doing with their people.


First, they allowed China to be able to sift through data on iCloud servers as they wish. Second, banning app that helped Hong Kong protesters to gather and organize their protest, using lame excuse that protestors used app to "target individual police officers and harass and assault them (how little of brain do you have to have to actually believe this).


Now this, this is another in a row of supporting China's oppression towards Chinese people. Tencent's "fraudulent website list" can be anything that Chinese doesn't see fit. Anything. If Chinese government is uncomfortable with it, than it is gonna be on "fraudulent sites list".


I am wondering where is the limit to Apple's hypocrisy?
 

iGeneo

macrumors demi-god
Jul 3, 2010
1,388
2,589
Much ado about nothing

To accomplish this task, Safari receives a list of websites known to be malicious from Google, and for devices with their region code set to mainland China, it receives a list from Tencent. The actual URL of a website you visit is never shared with a safe browsing provider and the feature can be turned off.


Of course, you guys can keep blathering on about how Apple is evil
 

Khedron

Suspended
Sep 27, 2013
2,561
5,755
Much ado about nothing




Of course, you guys can keep blathering on about how Apple is evil

Same as how Apple never shares your Siri requests with contractors... they just make transcripts and give those to contractors

More weasel words from Tim who only gives the Communist Party the general website you're visiting not the specific page
 

Bigsk8r

macrumors 6502
Nov 28, 2011
342
592
Austin, Texas
I am more comfortable with Google telling me that something "fraudulent" than China telling me that some website is "fraudulent".


We know what Chinese criteria for "fraudulent" can be.

Reading - and comprehending - the article and material would illustrate for you how you are not at all informed about that which you speak.

For the last time... only people physically connected to a Chinese IP address get routed to the Chinese apparatus, Tencent.

This is a huge nothing-burger.
 

ersan191

macrumors 68000
Oct 26, 2013
1,711
3,971
I love how the posts in this thread, complaining that people are overreacting and not reading critically, are just as spastic as the posts they are complaining about. It doesn't help your argument if you load your replies with condescension. But, here I am assuming you're trying to educate when you might be seeking to be rude with this topic as a pretense.
Says one of the most condescending posts here...
 

Count Blah

macrumors 68040
Jan 6, 2004
3,192
2,748
US of A
If you can't explain how this is a privacy concern then your obligation is to not be freaked out about it. And if you are freaked out about I can confidently state that you can't explain how this is a privacy concern.

People who understand how this system works are unconcerned. That's the opposite of "flippant disregard."
I think you are missing the part where companies USED to sweep this stuff under the rug / downplay things. With a ‘tell us and TELL US NOW!!’ Type attitude toward me security now, we are finally getting some info out of companies. Now we just need more whistle blowers to let us know if they are full of crap or not, with their(not just apple) responses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marekul

Eorlas

macrumors 65816
Feb 10, 2010
1,249
1,918
The same Tencent that now owns Reddit..?

Tencent owns a lot of things. They're not even slightly a company with one industry focus, they have ownership of different organizations across many industries. Their goal is clearly as much power as they can get a hold of.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.