Track us? Like tagged animals? I don’t think so!Yes the police should be able to track the public. That's how crimes are solved and criminals are stopped.
Theoretically Waze could be used to do that.So far I don’t have any issue with Apple pulling the app. I wouldn’t support an app in the USA that was used to target and ambush police so I can’t support one another country for this purpose.
So far I don’t have any issue with Apple pulling the app. I wouldn’t support an app in the USA that was used to target and ambush police so I can’t support one another country for this purpose.
How many thousands of crimes do you think iMessage has been used to plan? Ban this next please Apple.
which crime, censorship?Yeah that makes so much sense. Why don’t police in the USA do this as well. Hmm. I think you’re onto a new type of law-enforcement technique where police just avoid the crime LMAO
[automerge]1570714373[/automerge]
Sorry but human rights doesn’t include violently attacking and ambushing police.
so when Apple refused to unlock the phones of folks/potential terrorists, potentially targeting police / public in the US or folks using Facebook, Twitter for the same purpose, that’s ok? If Apple were really removing the app for the reasons they claim they would pull Facebook, Twitter and all, since they are all used in nefarious ways at times. It’s gone because there’s too much money at stake and for no other reason.
That's assuming a lot; are ALL of the users of the app using it for malicious intent?Agreed this is exactly my thoughts. There are people who believe police in the USA violate human rights and I’m sure it happens. Does this mean if an app in the USA was used by “protesters” to attack police with Molotov cocktails this would be OK?
Fine. But I hope Tim Cook gets an exit strategy from China going. I’ve seen enough of him fawning over China in keynotes. He’s done it less more recently, so I’m hoping that Apple is secretly hatching an exit strategy and just playing it cool so as to not tip their hand too soon.I am going to play devil's advocate and say that Apple did the right thing. There was nothing to be gained for them as a company and, dare I say, all the Apple customers who are not Hong Kong protesters interested in using that app. China is ruled by the Communist Party. Hong Kong is a Chinese city (de facto and is posed to become so de jure in 2049). Communist party is afraid of separatism like a plague - these are the facts. It would be strange to come do business in China and with China based on understanding of these facts and then do an about-face and start doing activism for human rights, etc.
Sure there’s videos of police arresting people during the day but I’m sure it’s not random. Police just don’t walk in the squad and say hey you were going to arrest you today. It’s more like they’re arresting someone for committing a crime. That’s like saying there’s videos in the US of police randomly arresting people. One could debate whether they deserve to be arrested for the said crime but that’s probably for another topic. Will go with your scenario though. Do you really think if this app was in the United States and designed for people wanted by law-enforcement to avoid arrest would stay in the App Store? I could make a strong argument that many people in the United States are arrested unjustly so we should have an app for this so people wanted can avoid police.Depending on what media you are view, there are alot more videos of the police just randomly arresting people during the day, and a lot more at night. At least the majority of citizens are using this app to avoid the police squads when they go out , for example, to have dinner.
You’re right some of the users could be just using it out of curiosity. This don’t mean it won’t be removed from the App Store. The app is being used for criminal purposes so Apple has removed.That's assuming a lot; are ALL of the users of the app using it for malicious intent?
Track us? Like tagged animals? I don’t think so!
They should do their jobs that my taxes pay for, which is patrol and respond to calls. Period. Unless they go through legal channels to put suspects under surveillance.
It's my understanding that people from Mainland China have to be against the HK protests because their Social Credit Score (read: Gov't-regulated reputation) depends on their compliance with the Gov't's ideologies.i'm honestly not surprised, apple, NBA, blizzard, they are for profit private companies afterall, with chinese being such a big market, they would be foolish to not please the CCP. and its not just the chinese gov't. majority of mainland chinese are against the hong kong protest. so if they don't get the CCP backlash they will surely get it from the mainland folks. these companies are between a rock and a hard place.