Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Karma*Police

macrumors 68030
Jul 15, 2012
2,521
2,866
Do you seriously believe Walmart or Kroger can run off the labor of only teenagers? And restaurants? I guess nobody should plan on eating out for lunch anymore since all the workers will be in school at that time.
Do you seriously believe people with little to no skills and education should be paid whatever they think they deserve?

Walmart managers make 6 figures. Drivers make 6 figures. If you work hard, there’s a path upward. For people with no skills who have no plans to make it their career can get a job and quit a few months later… and many do.

Higher minimum wages have shown to hurt lower income people the most. Employers can’t risk hiring people and training them if the wages are too high.
 

Unregistered 4U

macrumors G4
Jul 22, 2002
10,117
8,058
But that only means that particular union is corrupted. If you ate a really awful burger at xyz, it doesn't mean burgers are awful in general.
Not necessarily. It could also mean that the person wasn’t interested enough to find out what the union was doing. If the union was why the company offered a 401k AND the union is why the company was forced to have those silly meetings to tell everyone how to invest in their 401k or use the payroll stock purchase plan to make less money now (who wants LESS money in their check, right?), then the union was responsible for things the person wasn’t interested in knowing about.

Doesn’t mean that it wasn’t a good thing for those that understood the value of what was being offered.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland

nebojsak

macrumors 6502
Jan 2, 2014
345
337
Belgrade, Serbia
Do you seriously believe people with little to no skills and education should be paid whatever they think they deserve?

Walmart managers make 6 figures. Drivers make 6 figures. If you work hard, there’s a path upward. For people with no skills who have no plans to make it their career can get a job and quit a few months later… and many do.

Higher minimum wages have shown to hurt lower income people the most. Employers can’t risk hiring people and training them if the wages are too high.

So basically you're saying it's ok for employees to take all the risk?

This is not following your logic - if a company is not willing to take risks, they should be out of business.

Employer-employee relationship should be of a two-way kind. Employer is not doing any favor to employee, it's just paying for labor.
 

mlrproducts

macrumors 6502
Apr 18, 2004
443
522
While I'm sure it's gone downhill, when I started as a PT Specialist back in 07 or 08 my pay was like $17 an hour and the benefits were incredible.

That said over my nearly 10 year tenure I saw a lot of stuff go down hill, especially the hiring. But that is what happened as iPhone drove popularity and the likes of Ron Johnson left. The horrible Broward guy and then Angela... eeek.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland

Karma*Police

macrumors 68030
Jul 15, 2012
2,521
2,866
So basically you're saying it's ok for employees to take all the risk?

This is not following your logic - if a company is not willing to take risks, they should be out of business.

Employer-employee relationship should be of a two-way kind. Employer is not doing any favor to employee, it's just paying for labor.
What risk is the employee taking, exactly? If the company doesn’t make money, the business owner makes no money. But guess what? He still has to pay his employees that week.

If the business goes under, the employee can get another job elsewhere. He can even take his experience and turn that into a raise. The owner? He’s out 10’s of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.

Employees risk nothing other than the opportunity cost of working for someone else, which next to what a business owner risks, is nothing.
 

trusso

macrumors 6502a
Oct 4, 2003
764
2,256
Dear Apple,

(…and anyone else arguing against workers unionizing…),

**** off. Keep ****ing off until you come to a sign that says **** off. Then continue to **** off.
Perhaps a more family-friendly approach...



As an aside, I wonder why A Bug's Life is often overlooked in the pantheon of animated films. Perhaps because it's so on-the-nose? Also, props to anyone who understands the irony here due to the Apple-Pixar connection. ;)
 

4jasontv

Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
6,272
7,548
Do you work retail? Because I believe how companies treat their workers is likely directly related to how valuable that worker is to them. If an employee is valuable enough to a company, they’ll pay them $50k/year…even more, give a 5% 401k match, and decent healthcare benefits, plus more.

Is it possible to make 50K in retail? As a Senior Team Lead, Manager, Buyer, Communications Specialist or other skilled worker, sure, AND they get added benefits as well. For retail employees? I’d say the current market trend is 30K, but that may be generous.
No offense, but I disagree. I believe how companies treat their workers is directly related to how valuable they think executives are to the company. In 2000 you could make six figures in retail with a high school diploma. But as 2010 approached that number shrank. Then we had a weird culture shift where retailers wanted a BA/BS degree to do retail jobs. But as they found those workers they simultaneously wanted to pay them less and less.

Companies like Apple grew at this time because these employees saw retail as their ticket to the job they were trained for. Now we are seeing the aftermath of a decade of not looking inward for talent. The best retail positions were filled by these highly capable people, paid half of what they were worth, doing jobs that they were overqualified for. Meanwhile, their spirits died as they came to realize their effort and loyalty provided no upward mobility.

You can't blame retail employees for being unhappy.
 

jdoyle

macrumors 6502
Jul 29, 2004
301
509
OF course they dont want workers to Unionise. It's always been divide and conquer with large Corporations. Uniting is the only way. These people are not greedy. They just want a decent wage for an honest day's work.
 

criticasm

macrumors regular
Sep 15, 2017
210
348
The point of unionizing isn't to protect legitimately bad employees. It's to make sure you can't be fired without proper cause and that employees are compensated fairly for the work and value they provide the employer.
Yes we all know there's benefits to unions, but let's not ignore how some have become legit mobsters. Like the teachers union where teachers who have committed crimes (sometimes on students) can't be fired. They're removed from the classroom, but are still paid to spend working hours in these rooms with other "sequestered teachers". Not to mention to crap they pulled during covid when kids are the least affected.

Then there's the autoworkers union who greed for benefits couldn't be sustained, bankrupted 2 of the Big 3 & destroyed Americas decades long dominance in the car industry. This is why unions aren't as popular now 'cause they remember the history of when the parasite killed the host & everyone lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomnavratil

vipergts2207

macrumors 601
Apr 7, 2009
4,359
9,708
Columbus, OH
Do you seriously believe people with little to no skills and education should be paid whatever they think they deserve?

Walmart managers make 6 figures. Drivers make 6 figures. If you work hard, there’s a path upward. For people with no skills who have no plans to make it their career can get a job and quit a few months later… and many do.

Higher minimum wages have shown to hurt lower income people the most. Employers can’t risk hiring people and training them if the wages are too high.
I think an employee deserves a wage where they don’t have to rely on government support to get by. Do you like subsidizing Walmart’s crap pay with your tax dollars? I don’t. Every single company out there paying wages so low that their employees require government assistance are effectively stealing money from tax payers to pay their employees. A Walmart store only needs one store manger and is probably the only person in the store making 6 figures. Most of the rest of the 300+ employees are going to be low level cashiers, stockers, and sales associates. As with any business, you need far more indians than you do chiefs. Even if a Walmart store is full of quality workers, there are only so many decent paying positions to fill. Even department managers at Walmart only make around $15/hour. A typical Walmart store has likely only between half a dozen to a dozen positions where the pay is not crap to crappier.

Yes we all know there's benefits to unions, but let's not ignore how some have become legit mobsters. Like the teachers union where teachers who have committed crimes (sometimes on students) can't be fired. They're removed from the classroom, but are still paid to spend working hours in these rooms with other "sequestered teachers". Not to mention to crap they pulled during covid when kids are the least affected.
Nobody said there weren’t bad unions. No different than how there are terrible companies to work for. And what crap was pulled?

Then there's the autoworkers union who greed for benefits couldn't be sustained, bankrupted 2 of the Big 3 & destroyed Americas decades long dominance in the car industry. This is why unions aren't as popular now 'cause they remember the history of when the parasite killed the host & everyone lost.
Right, two of the big three going under had nothing to do with the US economy collapsing in 2008. It was all the unions. ?
 

brofkand

macrumors 65816
Jun 11, 2006
1,348
3,448
Can you point to evidence of Apple providing these benefits to Apple employees?

Does Apple provide retail employees performance-based bonuses?
Does Apple offer retail employees off-cycle raises?
Does Apple offer retail employees stock?
Does Apple regularly promote retail employees to positions of greater influence?
Does Apple offer retail employees lower insurance premiums over time?

Apple is concerned about the rate they offer these benefits. How often are they currently providing career and financial benefits to retail employees? Monthly? Quarterly? Bi-anually?

What other new career benefits does Apple routinely provide to retail employees that they can't do with a Union?

Granted it's been over a decade since I worked Apple retail, but the answer to those questions is yes they do. Please educate yourself about the company you're criticizing as this makes you look small and ignorant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tomnavratil

cmcbhi

Contributor
Nov 3, 2014
411
449
A union today is just a cancer drawing on your paycheck.
Especially if you are forced to pay union dues whether you want to do so or not. Yes, they do that.
Union "reps" then do nothing while charging against your paycheck.
Just pay a commission on sales.
 

cmcbhi

Contributor
Nov 3, 2014
411
449
The point of unionizing isn't to protect legitimately bad employees. It's to make sure you can't be fired without proper cause and that employees are compensated fairly for the work and value they provide the employer.
Sorry, Charlie.
The purpose of a onion IS to protect lazy employees. I know personally of a union that protected an employee who repeatedly came in drunk. But the union protected him because "he needed the job (paycheck) to feed his family. Specifically, he was a tire builder for a major company. Doesn't that make you feel safe in your car when the builder of your tire was drunk?
 

profcutter

macrumors 65816
Mar 28, 2019
1,460
1,170
Squirm, Deirdre, Squirm!

This is a half-hearted effort to stymie a long-overdue practice of union organization at major corporations. Real wages have stagnated since the 1970s, the same time that union membership hit a major decline in the US. We’re expected to pay more and more, but our wages don’t keep the pace. We’re supposed to make up for it with credit.

Apple, like most major companies, is riding high on the inflation train, but workers aren’t. If apple wants people to keep buying their shiny toys, they’re going to have to do more than a last minute desperation wage increase. Try living in Seattle on 22 dollars an hour, and see if you can afford a MacBook Pro. I hope this union effort succeeds, it would help all of us by raising the minimum bar.
 
  • Love
Reactions: maxoakland

vipergts2207

macrumors 601
Apr 7, 2009
4,359
9,708
Columbus, OH
A union today is just a cancer drawing on your paycheck.
Especially if you are forced to pay union dues whether you want to do so or not. Yes, they do that.
Union "reps" then do nothing while charging against your paycheck.
Just pay a commission on sales.
Every union is different. Some are good some are bad. The latter is not an indictment of the former. If I wasn’t already in a good paying job, I would much rather take my chances with a union than not.

Sorry, Charlie.
The purpose of a onion IS to protect lazy employees. I know personally of a union that protected an employee who repeatedly came in drunk. But the union protected him because "he needed the job (paycheck) to feed his family. Specifically, he was a tire builder for a major company. Doesn't that make you feel safe in your car when the builder of your tire was drunk?
Cool, you have an anecdote. What’s your point? Your example is simply that of a poorly run union and nothing more. Why would people unionize solely to protect the most worthless and lazy among them? That just means they have to pick up their coworkers slack. People unionize because they want fair wages and to not be fired on a whim. There are far more examples of large profitable companies paying their non-unionized workforce garbage wages than there are of unions doing nothing beneficial for their members. If members really don’t like their union they can disband it.
 

Unregistered 4U

macrumors G4
Jul 22, 2002
10,117
8,058
In 2000 you could make six figures in retail with a high school diploma.
As a cashier? As someone who stocks the shelves? (Because those are most of the people that are working retail.) Six figures… at least $100,000… ? I know someone making six figures in retail today, but she’s in charge of the sales floor transitions. Going from store to store and leading crews that do the work. BUT I’m intrigued and can use a search engine, so I plan to educate myself!

And, it’s still a matter of how valuable that person is to the company… how difficult it would be to replace them. Someone with the people skills, planning skills, and logistical aptitude to do the job she does would be hard for that retail company to replace. Someone that works the cash register is easier to replace. BUT not as easy to replace as someone that unloads the truck and puts those boxes in the store room or that picks up stock and place it back on the shelves.

You can't blame retail employees for being unhappy.
I wouldn’t say that the vast majority of retail employees have ever been “happy”. Satisfied that they have and can keep a job in order to pay some bills, yeah, but happy seems too strong of a word. The fact that retail employees are STILL unhappy isn’t really a surprise to me.
 

lovehateapple

macrumors 6502a
Oct 15, 2015
606
896
USA
Unionizing only "helps" workers in the short term. Over the long run it will slow growth in wages and harm both workers and consumers. The problem is once a union is created it is very difficult to get rid of once the long term effects set in.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: maxoakland

4jasontv

Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
6,272
7,548
Granted it's been over a decade since I worked Apple retail, but the answer to those questions is yes they do. Please educate yourself about the company you're criticizing as this makes you look small and ignorant.
My questions were retorical. No, they don't.
As a cashier? As someone who stocks the shelves? (Because those are most of the people that are working retail.) Six figures… at least $100,000… ? I know someone making six figures in retail today, but she’s in charge of the sales floor transitions. Going from store to store and leading crews that do the work. BUT I’m intrigued and can use a search engine, so I plan to educate myself!
I can't speak for cashiers but I was a bagger. The average tip for taking bags to a car was $5, and it took less than 5 minutes to bag and carry them. Not as good as waiting, cause that brought it $300 to $700 a shift.
And, it’s still a matter of how valuable that person is to the company… how difficult it would be to replace them. Someone with the people skills, planning skills, and logistical aptitude to do the job she does would be hard for that retail company to replace. Someone that works the cash register is easier to replace. BUT not as easy to replace as someone that unloads the truck and puts those boxes in the store room or that picks up stock and place it back on the shelves.
I agree that the real money was in retail sales. If you are paid a commission you will do very well, and SPIFFs added a bonus to that. I used to make over $300 just upselling socks when I sold shoes. When I worked at Radioshack after high school I made just shy of $8k a month. Anyone who sold phones before 2010 knows that $100k was reachable, but after that, it got harder, not because there were fewer customers (there were more) but because the pay was reduced significantly.

If you take a job with zero risk, such as stocking boxes, then yes you are going to be limited to salary. Most Apple retail customers are customer-facing sales positions, or they are technical and have productivity goals. Apple choosing to not pay retail employees a percentage of their sales has nothing to do with the value those employees add.
I wouldn’t say that the vast majority of retail employees have ever been “happy”. Satisfied that they have and can keep a job in order to pay some bills, yeah, but happy seems too strong of a word. The fact that retail employees are STILL unhappy isn’t really a surprise to me.
Again I disagree. I was very happy when I worked in retail, and most people I met in retail were happy. There was a time when if you had an industry you liked, you could find pleasure and pride in being at work. That directly translated to being happy.
 

iLilana

macrumors 6502a
May 5, 2003
808
300
Alberta, Canada
the retail industry is generally based on low margins. In markets where low margins (like liquor, food and discount clothing) they refer to low wages (minimum wage) as "industry standard". Apple is a closed box where the product is created, manufactured then sold by them. The margins are inflated. They should pay retail employees accordingly and that is what the unions want to accomplish. The problem being they license the product to other retailers to sell. Those retailers have the overhead that won't allow for the same margins because they are forced to buy the product from apple at and inflated price as well. This forces the retailer to keep their employees wages low by skirting labour laws and creating an environment where staff turnover is high. Difficult rotating schedules and part time positions are the only way retailers avoid paying more to employees from things like overtime. Apple is not in this dire position. They (like banks) swim in profit. The retail employees are pretty much screwed without a union.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland

VideoFreek

Contributor
May 12, 2007
577
180
Philly
I really have a hard time understanding American companies' utter hatred of unions. Back in the day, yeah unions mgmt could be pretty awful. Also back in the day mgmt was pretty awful. But why is the base assumption today that unionization is going to be such a hardship. Why cannot Apple look at how German mgmt and unions work together to strengthen companies. They both add huge value for the company. Of course labor gets two seats on each companies' board there which I am pretty sure most C-Level execs are completely opposed to given the board's role in approving pay. I mean would the labor seats have voted for Boeing's new exec to get $250Million his first year -- the same year that Boeings customers start going public ranting about how bad Boeings mgmt is. Well, a bit off topic there. Sorry.
If your frame of reference is German works councils (Betriebsräten), then I get why you have a hard time understanding this. I've worked as a manager at union and non-union shops in the USA and Germany, and the difference between the two countries is night and day. German works councils are staffed by actual adults who negotiate hard on behalf of the employees they represent, but who also care deeply about the long-term health of the company and see themselves as partners to management. German managers tend to see it that way, too. The USA unions I worked with were complete clown shows. A local union official (petrochemical industry) once told me that he could not care less whether the company swam or sank; he only cared about his workers. What a short-sighted imbecile, and his views were far from atypical.

I think one reason for this difference is that in Germany, unions are effectively enshrined in German law (Codetermination), but in the USA they must justify their existence (and high dues) to their membership. This leads them to take extreme positions, lest they be seen as caving to the management. Not a healthy dynamic.

No USA company wants to have a union, but on the other hand I'm reminded of what an older manager told me early in my career: "any company that has a union deserves one."
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.