Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,616
30,988


Apple today announced that it has cut its greenhouse gas emissions by more than half since 2015, advancing towards its 2030 carbon neutrality goal.

Apple-Park-View.jpeg


Apple's latest Environmental Progress Report details the company's efforts and innovations in clean energy, efficient recycling practices, and sustainable material usage that have contributed to this substantial decrease in emissions. According to the report, the major reduction has been driven by extensive use of clean energy, including the integration of recycled materials across Apple's product lines and improvements in energy efficiency throughout its global supply chain.

Apple has fostered significant advances in recycling and material recovery as part of its broader environmental strategy for several years. The company has increased the use of recycled cobalt and lithium in its batteries, with last year's statistics showing that 56% of the cobalt and 24% of the lithium used were sourced from recycled materials. These efforts are part of a larger initiative to transition to 100% recycled and renewable materials across all products.

The report also highlights achievements in energy efficiency and renewable energy sourcing. Over 16.5 gigawatts of clean energy are now being produced as a result of Apple's Supplier Clean Energy Program, which supports projects around the world. The program has been essential in reducing the carbon footprint Apple and its suppliers, who collectively saved more than two billion kilowatt-hours of electricity last year. The company is also actively removing plastics from its packaging, shifting towards fiber-based alternatives.

Apple also provides financial support to various organizations and programs aimed at improving environmental conditions and promoting sustainability education. In the U.S., for example, Apple supports Justice Outside's Network for Network Leaders program, which focuses on outdoor and environmental education.

See Apple's full 2024 Environmental Progress Report for more information.

Article Link: Apple Shares 2024 Environmental Progress Report Ahead of Earth Day
 
  • Like
Reactions: chevyboy60013

iPay

macrumors regular
May 25, 2023
211
421
Earth Day is all fine, but next quaterly results is going to be Dearth Day in view of China iPhone sales.
Quoting from Investopedia:
Sales in China, Apple's largest overseas market, dropped 24% in the first six weeks of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, according to market research firm Counterpoint. The iPhone maker's market share in China slipped to 16% in 2024, falling to fourth place from second place in 2023, when it had a 19% share.5 mars 2024
 

coffeemilktea

macrumors 6502a
Nov 25, 2022
852
3,452
The company has increased the use of recycled cobalt and lithium in its batteries, with last year's statistics showing that 56% of the cobalt and 24% of the lithium used were sourced from recycled materials.
who collectively saved more than two billion kilowatt-hours of electricity last year
The company is also actively removing plastics from its packaging
All this recycling and saved electricity and lessened plastic use are going to lead to lower costs for the consumer too, right?

....right?

🥺
 

Muhammad_arif

macrumors newbie
Apr 18, 2024
1
8


Apple today announced that it has cut its greenhouse gas emissions by more than half since 2015, advancing towards its 2030 carbon neutrality goal.

Apple-Park-View.jpeg


Apple's latest Environmental Progress Report details the company's efforts and innovations in clean energy, efficient recycling practices, and sustainable material usage that have contributed to this substantial decrease in emissions. According to the report, the major reduction has been driven by extensive use of clean energy, including the integration of recycled materials across Apple's product lines and improvements in energy efficiency throughout its global supply chain.

Apple has fostered significant advances in recycling and material recovery as part of its broader environmental strategy for several years. The company has increased the use of recycled cobalt and lithium in its batteries, with last year's statistics showing that 56% of the cobalt and 24% of the lithium used were sourced from recycled materials. These efforts are part of a larger initiative to transition to 100% recycled and renewable materials across all products.

The report also highlights achievements in energy efficiency and renewable energy sourcing. Over 16.5 gigawatts of clean energy are now being produced as a result of Apple's Supplier Clean Energy Program, which supports projects around the world. The program has been essential in reducing the carbon footprint Apple and its suppliers, who collectively saved more than two billion kilowatt-hours of electricity last year. The company is also actively removing plastics from its packaging, shifting towards fiber-based alternatives.

Apple also provides financial support to various organizations and programs aimed at improving environmental conditions and promoting sustainability education. In the U.S., for example, Apple supports Justice Outside's Network for Network Leaders program, which focuses on outdoor and environmental education.

See Apple's full 2024 Environmental Progress Report for more information.

Article Link: Apple Shares 2024 Environmental Progress Report Ahead of Earth Day
Does anyone know why Apple does not mention Airpods in their Environmental reports?
 

citysnaps

macrumors G4
Oct 10, 2011
11,904
25,841
All this recycling and saved electricity and lessened plastic use are going to lead to lower costs for the consumer too, right?

....right?

🥺

For sure it will stem cost increases due to inflation-driven COGS/overhead/benefits/etc increases.

Sadly, many here who don't understand the big picture with respect to product production and environmental consequences will see the above as some kind of perpetrated woke con by Apple.
 

imtoretto

macrumors regular
Aug 2, 2023
164
196
All this Movement of Green, Environment, planet, Save, Energy, renewable..... is a complete B-S.
They took out the earpods, then the charger block, then the plastic wrap, they even took out the plastic that covers the screen when you first take the phone out the box for crying out loud.....
Apple's Excuse is to "Protect the environment" which in reality is to cut more expenses on their end and Apple Still Charging the loyal consumer even more.....Guess whats the problem, or who is the problem adding to this???
The loyal consumer. The consumer that justifies this "reasons" are big part of the problem, that's why Apple do whatever they want.
 

Fuzzball84

macrumors 68020
Apr 19, 2015
2,035
4,468
It is great to see recycling… but they need to show us that the recycled materials are safe. Recycled material such as plastic is notorious for accumulating toxins and other chemicals from prior use, storage and the recycling process itself.

What they need to do is work with the manufacturers who they outsource to and tell the consumer the whole story.

Where did those recycled materials come from, what do they contain, are they safe? What is the pollution from both recycling and manufacturing?

I find it extremely hard to believe that the standards apple has for its own business activities are carried over right back through the outsourced supply chain. Remember, Apple is notorious for driving hard deals with suppliers.. that pressure is antithesis to what sustainable is about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kay_Ess and gusmula

Fuzzball84

macrumors 68020
Apr 19, 2015
2,035
4,468
Personally, I believe the increased repairability of items is a bigger deal than using recycled materials in new materials. If their goal is to truly reduce total usage (and not sell more products) then being able to repair an item easier will help with reducing the total waste we have rather than just replacing with a new product.
Exactly… reduced consumption is key… better repairability, modularity and longevity is the future of sustainability.
 

Fuzzball84

macrumors 68020
Apr 19, 2015
2,035
4,468
Too many people with this attitude, is why we’ll fail to stop global warming, and our children are going to suffer the consequences.
I think things will just get worse and worse… civilisations in the past have been wiped put due to environmental changes. Only this time it willbe on a whole new level. Crap in the ground, in the sea, in the air.. in space. Our junk is everywhere and its composition and structure is such that the trash and our materials of past few hundred years will leave an effectively permanent scar on the planet.
 

LoggerMN

macrumors member
Jan 14, 2013
53
70
Exactly… reduced consumption is key… better repairability, modularity and longevity is the future of sustainability.
Repairability does not automatically equal less waste. We have data-free arguments on this topic, which means the arguments are completely based on in unverified assumptions.

User level repair or manufacturer level repair. It doesn’t matter from the environment’s perspective. If I trade in an old phone to buy a new phone and my old phone gets refurbished and used again, from an environmental perspective it is the same as me fixing it. If non-repairability allows the phone to be built more robustly so it lasts longer. That offsets some of the benefit that user level repair provides. Then, if I do user level repair and simply trash, the old component that’s being replaced, that’s actually worse than turning in a phone to be fully recycled.

This is not to be misconstrued as an argument against user level repair. Only that we don’t have enough data to argue one way or the other. We need to know the useful lifespan in both use models and the recycle rates in both use models. We do not have this data.

I don’t even know if it’s possible to get this data since they’re so a few user repairable phones. Maybe they could instead do a comparison using computers where we have a lot of data in both use models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SFjohn

Fuzzball84

macrumors 68020
Apr 19, 2015
2,035
4,468
Repairability does not automatically equal less waste. We have data-free arguments on this topic, which means the arguments are completely based on in unverified assumptions.

User level repair or manufacturer level repair. It doesn’t matter from the environment’s perspective. If I trade in an old phone to buy a new phone and my old phone gets refurbished and used again, from an environmental perspective it is the same as me fixing it. If non-repairability allows the phone to be built more robustly so it lasts longer. That offsets some of the benefit that user level repair provides. Then, if I do user level repair and simply trash, the old component that’s being replaced, that’s actually worse than turning in a phone to be fully recycled.

This is not to be misconstrued as an argument against user level repair. Only that we don’t have enough data to argue one way or the other. We need to know the useful lifespan in both use models and the recycle rates in both use models. We do not have this data.

I don’t even know if it’s possible to get this data since they’re so a few user repairable phones. Maybe they could instead do a comparison using computers where we have a lot of data in both use models.
Getting reliable and trustworthy data is extremely difficult.

But in my experience, user enabled repair at home can be extremely effective if the device is designed with that in mind. Thats the key... repairability and longevity have to be designed in. At the moment that is just not the case with most household goods, including computers and phones. It is far more environmentally friendly to ship a small part to a user, and ship the defective part back...

If you send in a device for repair and get a new one... you are relying on someone else buying that repaired device instead of getting a new one. And if you have it recycled... well then there is the environmental cost of your new phone.. and the environmental cost of the recycling (yes, recycling causes waste too). Thats why it's best to reduce consumption in the first instance... this is the best way forward until our devices can be recycled sustainably.
 

sunapple

macrumors 68030
Jul 16, 2013
2,743
5,076
The Netherlands
Personally, I believe the increased repairability of items is a bigger deal than using recycled materials in new materials. If their goal is to truly reduce total usage (and not sell more products) then being able to repair an item easier will help with reducing the total waste we have rather than just replacing with a new product.
There is a section about this in the report.

This graphic is pretty hilarious, "IPHONE LONGEVITY JOURNEY"
(Black items are "Repairable at retail stores, Apple Authorized Service Providers, and central repair locations")

iPhone 1st generation:
  • SIM-tray
:oops:

Scherm­afbeelding 2024-04-18 om 21.06.46.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StuBeck

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
34,303
24,034
Gotta be in it to win it
Apple thinks we care, but we really don’t. And like it was said earlier, that awful skit with Tim and team, gag.

Go innovate and make better products for once. They seemingly have gotten very lazy
It’s irrelevant if we “care”. Apple is marching toward their states progress. Consumers will buy products or not, but apple is still headed toward carbon neutrality.
 
  • Love
Reactions: PantherKang
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.