This site is called MacRumors, not MacFacts yet most of the rumors posted here are treated as fact. I don't get it.
Exactly. Everyone is so quick to believe whatever is posted. Even though it's all 'unnamed sources', 'possibly', 'might be'. And the classic game of claiming something and then claiming there was an issue right before we are going to find out that it wasn't correct.
A highly reliable source at re/code says the new iPhones will be announced Sept 9 and we're supposed to believe
That that date is correct. Much less anything else. After all, Apple didn't say it and Apple is the only truly reliable source.
Yes the date fits their typical practice. But then again, releasing an iPhone in early summer was their typical pattern and they broke it. Releasing the iPad in March was typical and they broke that. And so on.
----------
Cook might have been some kind of parts supply guru, but he's obviously not great at managing production.
Two of your examples are just as much rumor as everything else. Which is why they are 'apparently' and 'reportedly'.
The only thing that you got correct was the mixture issue and that was one time. One confirmed time. The rest is just rumor which might be true and might be some rumor monger covering his butt