It seems everyone thinks work from home is good for them, just not the other people.
I generally agree with
@bbeagle, but I find it interesting that they think having senior people at the office is better for the company but that they are somehow more productive at home. What that means to me is that they and their employer are misaligned on why they have the job they do.
@bbeagle thinks it's because they can do a lot of work, and their employer thinks it's because they can make the entire company more productive and working from home means they may not be accomplishing what their employer wants them to.
Misalignments in expectations is what leads to disagreements about performance...
Senior people produce more work having less distractions. It's one reason why senior people are more likely to get offices with doors that close, and junior people get cubicles or open environments.
However, the company wants to make use of the senior people in more than just the work that they can produce, but in helping the junior people with training/insight/coaching/teaching. This will lower the productivity of the senior person, but hopefully increase the productivity of the company as a whole.
Junior people like to stay at home as they have time to get the information to things without looking stupid. For example, someone brings up in chat 'why don't we use Cassandra for the next project?' They have no clue who Cassandra is. What department is she in? She's not in the company directory! They then google it, and find out it's a NoSQL database. They can respond to the question with 'A NoSQL database - I haven't used it much, but I would like to get more experience' - sounding like they know more than they do. Or they can spend more time than the allotted 8 hours at work to do things at home, and look more competent.
Imagine this: A senior referee at a soccer/football game notices a handball by the defense inside the box. Whistle. Penalty kick. Imagine if that referee was a junior referee who didn't know the rules quite yet and he has 1 minute to make a decision. He is able to look through his rule book at that point and figure out, hmmm... that's a penalty kick. What are the rules for a penalty kick? Where does the ball go? Where do the other players go? Etc. Etc. He figures this all out then announces it. The fans would think the junior referee is competent as well. (Given nobody knows that he's looking at the rulebook and 1 minute is an allowable period of time to make a decision. Which it is in the new work at home world, but it's not in the old inside-a-meeting world)
But Junior people are missing the human connections they need to succeed in their careers later.
So, senior people want to stay at home, and should fight for it. Junior people want to stay at home, but really shouldn't fight for it. Companies should want everyone back to the office, juniors 5 days, seniors maybe 2-3 days. Enough for seniors to lead the juniors, but also enough so they get more done.
I'm not talking about the 20% of people (of both seniors and juniors) who like stay-at-home because they work less and watch Scooby Doo more. I'm talking about reasons for people who want to be productive to like both environments.