Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's Latest Transparency Report Includes Geofence Requests From U.S. Government
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
By saying that, aren’t you also saying “screw you” to the victims of crimes that could be solved with just a little more information? Maybe that last missing piece to solve a kidnapping or worse?
Definitely. I have a friend who works in this field and he says a lot of apps on the App Store sell all kinds of data. That’s one of the reasons I’m a bit suspicious of Apple’s privacy marketing. If they really cared about privacy, they wouldn’t allow any apps to collect or sell anything. My friend says a lot of the weather apps are really bad when it comes to privacy. He said the weather channel is by far the worst when it comes to selling location data. Personally I don’t really trust anything any of these companies say, including Apple. The privacy ship sailed a looooong time ago.
This is a weird thing to unambiguously celebrate. Sure, it's good that Apple isn't tracking me and sending my data to the NSA 24/7 just for kicks, but what if Danelo Cavalcante had had an iPhone on him? Would've been nice if Apple could assist law enforcement in narrow cases like that, right?
Is there anyone out there who can kinda see this both ways? Just me?
Is there anyone out there who can kinda see this both ways? Just me?
I think most people can see it both ways. The problem is, how do you not collect data but also collect it for when it might be lifesaving? We might all be able to see it both ways, but we can’t have it both ways.
Yall really believe this??
lol Apple & all these corporations all with the US corporation I mean Gov
Cellular companies have that data, from flip phone to smart phone they track it all. 
Yes, it is the same thing. That ‘unreadable data’ is unreadable, as you put it. There’s nothing that law enforcement can do with it. I don’t see your point.
Yes. Why would they lie? If there’s anything misleading about this it’s definitely by omission. Outright making a false statement seems like a weird liability, especially in this kind of document that few people are interested in and even fewer will read.
In this scenario, law enforcement could quickly and easily get a warrant to track his location via cell carriers. We have to always balance the line between government overreach and privacy.
All I have to say on this is that if Face ID is disabled, and you have a nice fat alphanumeric key code, that code is your intellectual property and you do not have to give it up. Of course, especially at a border, your phone can be seized. Hell, you might even get it back someday. If you have Face ID activated to unlock phone, you can be forced to stick your face there and unlock phone and same goes with older Touch ID. So, in short, if you will be in an insecure situation, shot off Face ID Unlock Phone option.
Last edited:
I appreciate you taking the time to explain. So when in doubt, turn the phone off.
Any insights on equivalent vulnerabilities to a Mac with a long password and FileVault turned on?
Why would they object? Is it because they can’t charge for it? After all it’s no more effort, it’s just lines of data for them to send.
LE needs people's permission take their data without a search warrant. And by the time they have enough on someone for that, it's too late to go back and track them. However, people click "agree" on terms and conditions that give companies permission to collect their data. And now when LE has reason to get a search warrant there is already a treasure trove of data to retrieve.
LE and corporations have a similar right to random peoples information: none. But anyone can give permission for their data to be collected, and people readily give it to corporations that offer something in exchange.
Some of those requests require an unreasonable amount of manpower and thus they object to the warrant being too broad. They require a smaller time frame or location data.
Not a problem. I'm a firm believer in law enforcement playing by the rules (Constitution) when doing their jobs. I taught 4th Amendment issues in the academy and specialized in electronic search law.
If the phone is off it would put the phone into AFU mode, making access much more difficult. Hitting your power button 5 times to require a passcode would do the same. FileVault and a long password are excellent defenses. Most LE consider FileVaulted Macs to be a lost cause. I am of course only aware of what tools could do when I left the business in March of this year and that's not accounting for secret squirrel tools that the NSA and others possess that average law enforcement are not aware of.
I do know there are some scary tools coming down the pipe. Things like bluetooth vulnerabilities and tools that I'm sure Apple will need to counter.
I am not sure if it counts as an answer to your question but I am heard that there are proprietary mobile OS's that are being used usually by the government officials.
It’s materially the same.
Unknown, depending on hardware and iOS. Doing so will be via exploits, and those are patched over time. New ones sometimes show up and are used.
This is speculation, as for current devices and iOS.
Speculation, see above. This has definitely been done in the past.
Keep in mind that the other person is speculating. We don’t have that information. Apple isn’t interested in such access, obviously, so the means used to get it are closed with updates.
this is why i leave my phone at home while i’m out doing my crimes
Ah - so you think. I sneak in to your home and take your phone with me when I am doing MY crimes, then sneak back to return it later!! 🤣🤣🤣this is why i leave my phone at home while i’m out doing my crimes
Wording matters, there is a difference between the words 'receiving' and 'collecting'. I have no doubt Apple servers 'receive' everything from an iphone, Apple just chose not to do anything with certain aspects of it. It would be very naïve of people to take Apple at it's word.