It's when you can paint on video frames and keyframe the strokes.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are you going to upgrade to Affinity V2?
- Thread starter hajime
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It's when you can paint on video frames and keyframe the strokes.
An open source & free excellent alternative to TVPaint would be OpenToonz. Video can be imported in one layer and painting (rotoscoping) in another layer (either vector or bitmap). Excellent onion skinning is of course also featured.
A Silicon version doesn't exist (yet?), but it comes as a universal binary.
Perhaps not immediately apparent, but Blender also allows for rotoscoping video and drawing over the video frames using Grease Pencil.
And don't forget Clip Studio Paint EX, which also imports video and allows for rotoscoping. And is much nicer to paint and draw in than TVPaint (in my opinion). Not free, though. But worth it. Is Silicon ready, as far as I am aware.
(Do not get the Pro version which is only capable of animating 24 frames.)
I know all these. The problem with Toonz is it has a very outdated cross platform interface. Just wish we could have something just as capable as TV Paint and OpenToonz but with a native macOS interface. I played with ToonBoom a few times but I prefer the potential of the others.
@enterthemerdaverse The GUI itself or the usability thereof isn't an issue with OpenToonz in my opinion: the animation timeline is very intuitive and simple/effective to animate with.
The GUI is also quite configurable and works great on multiple screens unlike 'modern' GUIs of a lot of current software that is doing the rounds in which it is not even possible to reposition the tool and property panels anymore.
It may look snazzy, but trades usability and flexibility in configuration for GUI eye candy. I blame the influence of iOS and mobile platform GUI rigidness.
I feel too many users often allow themselves to be distracted by the varnish and gloss of a GUI. It is well established from UX research that the identical GUI presented as two different versions (one with a nice varnished look and the other identical but without the eye candy) have absolutely no impact on the usability and effectiveness of a GUI - even though users may convince themselves that the nicer looking GUI works better.
Anyway: I agree it would be nice to have a more Mac-like basic look. But not when it is detrimental to usability. A good example is Affinity 2, which introduced a number of very questionable GUI design decisions in that version. With Affinity I wonder sometimes if the development team includes a GUI/UX designer at all (I do not think there is one).
The real issue with OpenToonz (and many other open source apps) is that it relies on OpenGL for its view rendering, and since Apple decided to depreciate that API form its OS it may become problematic in the near future for it to run on the MacOS platform.
The GUI is also quite configurable and works great on multiple screens unlike 'modern' GUIs of a lot of current software that is doing the rounds in which it is not even possible to reposition the tool and property panels anymore.
It may look snazzy, but trades usability and flexibility in configuration for GUI eye candy. I blame the influence of iOS and mobile platform GUI rigidness.
I feel too many users often allow themselves to be distracted by the varnish and gloss of a GUI. It is well established from UX research that the identical GUI presented as two different versions (one with a nice varnished look and the other identical but without the eye candy) have absolutely no impact on the usability and effectiveness of a GUI - even though users may convince themselves that the nicer looking GUI works better.
Anyway: I agree it would be nice to have a more Mac-like basic look. But not when it is detrimental to usability. A good example is Affinity 2, which introduced a number of very questionable GUI design decisions in that version. With Affinity I wonder sometimes if the development team includes a GUI/UX designer at all (I do not think there is one).
The real issue with OpenToonz (and many other open source apps) is that it relies on OpenGL for its view rendering, and since Apple decided to depreciate that API form its OS it may become problematic in the near future for it to run on the MacOS platform.
That's the problem I have and you saying it more detailed terms. If they updated it to a modern native Mac app then naturally they would also use Metal. I just don't see it happening any time soon so I worry the app would break in some future macOS.
This actually is the case with the excellent free (and open source) Storyboarder (a wonderful storyboarding app with a shot generator that utilizes 3d characters to quickly work out shots).
I last checked on our Mac Studios at work, and the shot generator just won't work. It crashes or comes up empty. All because of OpenGL issues.
A real shame. Also the reason why I have a Windows workstation at home, because Macs are a bit too volatile for my taste for 3d work and animation. It will take a few years yet to fix all the software issues caused by the move to Silicon (as it did before when Apple transitioned from 68xxx to Arm, and after that to Intel.
(say what you want about Windows: I can still run software from almost three decades ago... Which does come in handy at times)
So not video processing, but you can use it pretty seamlessly with Motion and FPC to bring elements and LUTs in.
Interesting. But I can't see the point of doing any color grading in Pixelmator as a DaVinci Resolve user
Resolve has industry standard color grading built-in. Pixelmator can't really compare.
Whatever floats your boat! I wasn't talking to you though!Interesting. But I can't see the point of doing any color grading in Pixelmator as a DaVinci Resolve user
Resolve has industry standard color grading built-in. Pixelmator can't really compare.
I'm thinking about moving to the entire suite once my Adobe CC annual subscription ends. I was impressed with how fast V1 was awhile back although the lack of features like Smart Objects was a bit of a disappointment (not sure if that has changed).
I think ideally I would have the suite replace Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign for my home and freelancing needs. I'm kinda stuck with buying just a monthly subscription with After Effects which is a bummer but it at least saves me some money from buying the entire suite again.
I think ideally I would have the suite replace Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign for my home and freelancing needs. I'm kinda stuck with buying just a monthly subscription with After Effects which is a bummer but it at least saves me some money from buying the entire suite again.
I wouldn't replace it for your freelancing needs if your clients expect the get ID, AI, and PS files from you.
Yeah that does concern me a bit even though I've only had a few request the working files from me. I can probably get away with EPS for AI files and I think Affinity Photo can export PSDs (correct me if I'm wrong) but InDesign could be problematic.
Affinity Photo can export PSDs, but I've never actually checked to see if they present any problems when opened in PS, so do that if you're serious. And, yeah, ID is a problem.
I was on the fence with getting V2, however now that I upgraded to a newer machine, I will be upgrading on the next go around of discounts. Kinda wished I bought it anyways at this point. Dang it.