Watch the twit video. Anyway my disagreement is solely around the notion that Apple is either not being truthful or just doesn't care (because it's all about profits). I think Apple is sincere in what it's trying to do and is doing more than most of its peers. Does that mean things don't slip through the cracks or there isn't more to do? Of course not. If that makes me a blind Apple apologist, so be it.
just watched it.
first off it says right away
"The FBI blames North Korea for the Sony Pictures hack, The BBC blames Apple for labor woes in Asia, Google blames Hollywood for conspiring to bring back SOPA, and more."
which shows extreme bias right of the bat.
the only guest is a forbes writer covering mobile technology. where are you questioning the balance there?
they both argue that apple has genuine interest in improving the standards and talk about years to decade(s) in the time it takes to "fix" things. what exactly of the problems covered takes decades to fix?
seriously considering the rudimentary state of the tin industry in indonesia and some of the factory conditions how much improvement has actually been made?
and mr spence is free to cover the christmas tree decoration industry in china. the idea that either you cover all or none is bizarre.
their opposition to an absolutist viewpoint does that also translate to domestic abuse and more?
its like when the people on fox when they talk about minimum wage and ask questions like "why not go to $100 per hour". its counterproductive, its illogical and its only purpose is to muddy the water
why would an iphone cost 2000 pounds if they didnt have to cheat on overtime, take ids, squeeze 12 in a room or have so many try to kill themselves at foxconn?
