Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
design changes on the upcoming powerbooks?
- Thread starter Wano
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Let's look at the technologies that are fairly common on the PC side, and that Apple has yet to implement in its portables:
USB 2.0
Built-in BlueTooth (or an internally-held expansion card)
DDR Memory
Hardware-based variable bus timing
These have been discussed at length in these forums and I think are the most likely candidates for the next "major" revision to the portable lineup.
The tablet PC phoenomenon is interesting. Microsoft only expects a few hundred thousand units to be sold in its first year, which, to them, represents more of a test market than a viable business unit at this point in time. Apple, however, is a niche player in the industry and such a technology, if aggressively developed by the company, could represent a potential opportunity for the company to capture market share. A hundred thousand units to Apple would be a nice additional revenue stream. So, while I still don't think it is likely they will come out with a tablet any time soon, this is one argument supporting that possibility. Of course, being the market follower and having to overcome Microsoft's marketing efforts to link its brand with the tablet PC concept would mean Apple would have to spend BIG money on both R&D and promotion. That's money I don't think they have. So, personally, I think Apple will steer clear of the tablet PC market and introduce either an alternative, or invent a whole new product category that hasn't yet been seen on the market.
USB 2.0
Built-in BlueTooth (or an internally-held expansion card)
DDR Memory
Hardware-based variable bus timing
These have been discussed at length in these forums and I think are the most likely candidates for the next "major" revision to the portable lineup.
The tablet PC phoenomenon is interesting. Microsoft only expects a few hundred thousand units to be sold in its first year, which, to them, represents more of a test market than a viable business unit at this point in time. Apple, however, is a niche player in the industry and such a technology, if aggressively developed by the company, could represent a potential opportunity for the company to capture market share. A hundred thousand units to Apple would be a nice additional revenue stream. So, while I still don't think it is likely they will come out with a tablet any time soon, this is one argument supporting that possibility. Of course, being the market follower and having to overcome Microsoft's marketing efforts to link its brand with the tablet PC concept would mean Apple would have to spend BIG money on both R&D and promotion. That's money I don't think they have. So, personally, I think Apple will steer clear of the tablet PC market and introduce either an alternative, or invent a whole new product category that hasn't yet been seen on the market.
Have to
I am IT student and I plan to buy a PowerBook but never before :
USB2
Firewire2
Built-in Bluetooth
I really hope a new design, and DDR, top video card, hard freq change, and has dream ;
A tablete writing area below the keybord and bi-pro
I am IT student and I plan to buy a PowerBook but never before :
USB2
Firewire2
Built-in Bluetooth
I really hope a new design, and DDR, top video card, hard freq change, and has dream ;
A tablete writing area below the keybord and bi-pro
what about the 970?
i know this is way the hell off, but out of curiosity, the ppc 970 uses both copper, and SOI, as well as a smaller dye... and the G5 will likely be quite powerhungry if it's made with aluminum as is motorola's bad habit. so the question is, if it runs starting at 1.4 [or was it 1.8?] GHz, then, wouldn't it be conceievable to see a 970 in portables first? I mean who cares about a power efficient desktop? it's plugged into the wall. then that would leave the gap for iBooks to inherit the G4 as an inferior processor. apple already has IBM doing the G3 chips for the iBooks, and IBM, IIRC, has optimized the hell out of the G3, getting it running at a cool GHz and some change. just a thought.
oh, and I'm plenty happy about the radeon 9000 mobilitys being used in the portables. I wouldn't think apple should update the video chipset till Nvidia comes out with their big honkin FX chipset.
i know this is way the hell off, but out of curiosity, the ppc 970 uses both copper, and SOI, as well as a smaller dye... and the G5 will likely be quite powerhungry if it's made with aluminum as is motorola's bad habit. so the question is, if it runs starting at 1.4 [or was it 1.8?] GHz, then, wouldn't it be conceievable to see a 970 in portables first? I mean who cares about a power efficient desktop? it's plugged into the wall. then that would leave the gap for iBooks to inherit the G4 as an inferior processor. apple already has IBM doing the G3 chips for the iBooks, and IBM, IIRC, has optimized the hell out of the G3, getting it running at a cool GHz and some change. just a thought.
oh, and I'm plenty happy about the radeon 9000 mobilitys being used in the portables. I wouldn't think apple should update the video chipset till Nvidia comes out with their big honkin FX chipset.
Re: Have to
Firewire 2? you wont buy PB without FW2? wtf?
we cant even know for sure if that technology exists, and why would anyone need such a high bandwidth? besides if it even somehow gets out there wont be much devices that are compatible with it for a long time and they might be expensive as hell
built-in bluetooth, true that i wish powerbook has one..but for now the only solution seem those usb adapters..
Why do you need USB 2.0? Most of stuff comes in firewire, and if you really need it you can get PCMCIA USB 2.0 adapter
Firewire 2? you wont buy PB without FW2? wtf?
we cant even know for sure if that technology exists, and why would anyone need such a high bandwidth? besides if it even somehow gets out there wont be much devices that are compatible with it for a long time and they might be expensive as hell
built-in bluetooth, true that i wish powerbook has one..but for now the only solution seem those usb adapters..
Personally i would like the paint ("Titanium"... ) not to vanish into the thin air in a month... Seriously, why isn't it more durable? For $3000?
Why USB2 ?
Beacause all PC have FireWire now, if Apple don't have some + for the price tag, they will lose share.
And more and more device are using USB2
And fot the look, it's been more than 2 years since the first Ti, hey gut show us some think new, I have to hadmit I love it but a litle redisign will help. To get rid of the peinture pb, I thougt about a darker case ? With Airport anthena outside and keep that super cool TI.
Beacause all PC have FireWire now, if Apple don't have some + for the price tag, they will lose share.
And more and more device are using USB2
And fot the look, it's been more than 2 years since the first Ti, hey gut show us some think new, I have to hadmit I love it but a litle redisign will help. To get rid of the peinture pb, I thougt about a darker case ? With Airport anthena outside and keep that super cool TI.
gotta say i love my TiBook and its held up pretty well (dont know WHAT flickta is talking about...my paint is just dandy). i think we wont see major design changes till the new chip comes out...then i think all the lines will get an overhaul. It will be hard to beat this design, and if it is drastically changed i will probably keep this one and just hit up my family up for money for a new one. I have a cube i dont really use but im not getting rid of it...its art. so is my TiBook (though i use it almost exclusively 
).
).
Re: Have to
DUAL PROCESSORS IN A LAPTOP WILL NOT HAPPEN UNLESS THEY CAN DISSIPATE THE HEAT AND INCLUDE A 120 W-hr battery (the current one is 61 W-hr)
Before...
No matter how bad mac users hate PCs, USB2 will be implemented eventually, probably within the next year, probably a couple months after firewire2 is released.
See above.
I know you want to be cutting edge, but ask yourself if you truly need bluetooth. That said, bluetooth is not that widespread within PC laptops, but I see Apple implementing bluetooth soon. Probably the next revision or so.
Very possible, the DDR will probably make its way into the next revision or the one after that. As for the graphics card, I'm not sure Apple will do that again, but here's to hoping. As for the case design, I'm predicting a new paint job.
You really got to word that a little better, I know that you meant it as a dream, or a hope you did.
DUAL PROCESSORS IN A LAPTOP WILL NOT HAPPEN UNLESS THEY CAN DISSIPATE THE HEAT AND INCLUDE A 120 W-hr battery (the current one is 61 W-hr)
Re: Re: Re: Have to
Dude, you worded your post like you were never going to buy a powerbook at all until it had those features. Obviously you meant a new powerbook.
Dude, you worded your post like you were never going to buy a powerbook at all until it had those features. Obviously you meant a new powerbook.
Re: Re: Re: Have to
Not currently. Nvidia has a better performing chip (can't remember the name) which is great for gaming portables. Bad for power comsumption.
I started a thread on this, but no one seems to care.
Click me.
But like they say...new technology is always around the corner...in a year we'll have a new chip but apple may be content to stay with the current chip.
This is all speculation
Not currently. Nvidia has a better performing chip (can't remember the name) which is great for gaming portables. Bad for power comsumption.
I started a thread on this, but no one seems to care.
Click me.
But like they say...new technology is always around the corner...in a year we'll have a new chip
but apple may be content to stay with the current chip.This is all speculation