Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,791
31,260


Spotify's elusive lossless music experience is being teased again, this time based on code uncovered by The Verge in recent builds of the Spotify app for Android.

General-Spotify-Feature.jpg

More than three years have elapsed since Spotify announced its intention to offer a "HiFi" premium option that would give users access to a catalog of CD-quality music tracks. Originally the company said the tier would go live by the end of 2021, but a shift in the wider streaming market upended that idea.

Apple Music has since rolled lossless listening into its standard subscription price, while Amazon stopped charging extra for its lossless music library. The moves effectively kiboshed Spotify's original strategy of marketing an exclusively lossless HiFi tier.

That said, it doesn't sound as if lossless is coming as a free perk. The latest rumors suggest that Spotify now aims to offer lossless audio playback in an optional "Music Pro" add-on that will also include new DJ remix features, which let subscribers "speed up, mash-up, and otherwise edit" tracks from their favorite artists, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Spotify will likely make some basic remixing tools available as part of its Premium subscription (currently $10.99 a month, or $5.99 for students), but more powerful tools will be part of its "Music Pro" add-on. Where recent rumors of a new top "Supremium" tier fit in is unclear.
The intended price of the premium add-on has not been revealed, but given that major rivals include lossless in their standard plans, expecting subscribers to pay anything more than a nominal fee may be a big ask.

Article Link: Elusive Spotify Lossless Option May Arrive as Paid 'Music Pro' Add-on
 
Last edited:

Squuiid

macrumors 68000
Oct 31, 2006
1,863
1,611
Native HomePod integration would be nice.
 

fakestrawberryflavor

macrumors 6502
May 24, 2021
394
522
And most people still won't notice any difference in quality. I'll stick with the standard tier because I do my listening through AirPods and my desktop speakers aren't good enough for lossless.
I have a dac and 2000$ speaker setup and I can't tell a difference between apple lossless, my Flac cd rips, and Spotify high 320kpbs

I'm sure technically there is somewhere but I'm hard pressed to find it
 

WatermelonSugarHigh

macrumors newbie
Dec 11, 2023
5
3
It would be nice with DJ sets (Audio only or with video), like Tomorrowland, Boiler Room, Mix Mag, Ultra music Festival and Drumcode Radio etc.
 

GrayFlannel

macrumors 6502
Feb 2, 2024
318
614
More audio hype being peddled from companies like Apple and Spotify to appear to be providing improvements that matter. But in reality to almost every user these features are completely meaningless not lossless.

Spend your money the way you wish but smarten up. Just be realistic enough to admit you can not distinguish the difference with these micro changes. Everyone thinks they are part of the 1%… a connoisseur. People are gullible beyond belief. Nothing pains them more than actually having to actually think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ypl

bodhisattva

macrumors 6502
Dec 7, 2008
265
382
And most people still won't notice any difference in quality. I'll stick with the standard tier because I do my listening through AirPods and my desktop speakers aren't good enough for lossless.
Right! I won a pretty awesome pair of Sennheiser headphones in a hackathon, and even the best lossless audio is barely perceptible as better. But I'd have to be focused and concentrating to make out the small differences that otherwise would go unnoticed. I constantly see friends asking for lossless, and all sorts of premium audio options, but listening to their music on base model Beats. 🙃
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaPhox and ypl

jlc1978

macrumors 603
Aug 14, 2009
5,513
4,291
More audio hype being peddled from companies like Apple and Spotify to appear to be providing improvements that matter. But in reality to almost every user these features are completely meaningless not lossless.

Spend your money the way you wish but smarten up. Just be realistic enough to admit you can not distinguish the difference with these micro changes. Everyone thinks they are part of the 1%… a connoisseur. People are gullible beyond belief. Nothing pains them more than actually having to actually think.

Back when I was in university, people obsessed and argued incessantly over audio specs that made no difference to the listener; much the same as with computer specs today. As you point out, it's simply marketing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.