Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

GiantKiwi

macrumors regular
Jun 13, 2016
170
136
Cambridge, UK
I think you might be overestimating a) the percentage of people remote working and, b) the percentage of those people working for businesses large enough to have managed IT.

I'm underestimating - UK government alone can account for at least quarter of a million, add UK universities, scientific institutions, technology companies etc and you have a few million just in the UK.
 

GiantKiwi

macrumors regular
Jun 13, 2016
170
136
Cambridge, UK
Quick google search shows that 134 million are using VPNs, most are for work, so that means when not working those aren't using VPN, there are 844 million people using safari.

There are 1 billion iPhones sold. That doesn't mean that they're all in use :rolleyes: Especially in this case, this feature precludes anything older than a 6S regardless of the fact that its not out of beta channel, so has less than a few hundred thousand users. Then you have to account for the number of users who never update their devices (ie anyone with the no technical affinity). 844 million, do jog on mate.
 

KZeni

macrumors newbie
Dec 26, 2016
11
14
Iowa, USA
So 1: This is a tremendously bad idea.
2: Idiots will support it because propaganda has rotted their brains that Apple is a monopoly while the carriers are somehow not.
Exactly. I think the real issue is how much control/access ISPs (mobile carriers included, if not "especially") currently have and how few real options people are given in certain areas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GarethR

nwcs

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2009
2,722
5,262
Tennessee
It's funny that for all the pushes to globalization over the past few decades things are crawling back to balkanization and regionalism.
 

Mr. Heckles

macrumors 65816
Mar 20, 2018
1,385
1,795
Around
I don’t use because I use Firefox. It also only protects Safari and none of the apps on the phone. I use us a VPN, this way all of my internet traffic is protected, not just Safari.
 

daveak

macrumors 6502
Jun 28, 2009
306
346
Durham, UK
Almost, but not quite.

  • It's a Safari-only thing, whereas a typical VPN will cover traffic from your other apps and services
It is not just safari. All DNS requests go out over it, so it can mess with an internal only DNS and prevent connection to machines on your own network that you access via their internal domain names. e.g I use prompt which is an ssh app. I have to connect via ip rather than something like myserver.mynetwork which would work without private relay enabled.
 

LV426

macrumors 68000
Jan 22, 2013
1,838
2,272
It is not just safari. All DNS requests go out over it, so it can mess with an internal only DNS and prevent connection to machines on your own network that you access via their internal domain names. e.g I use prompt which is an ssh app. I have to connect via ip rather than something like myserver.mynetwork which would work without private relay enabled.
Apple mention Safari several times when they describe the service.
 

Mr. Heckles

macrumors 65816
Mar 20, 2018
1,385
1,795
Around
Last edited:

DrV

macrumors 6502
Sep 25, 2007
271
508
Northern Europe
I was mostly just having a bit of fun and obviously your statements get more to the point. Keep in mind that the commission sets the playing field. The telcos (on queue of course) are there to try and abuse it. I'm sure the concept of "digital sovereignty" is noble and makes sense on the surface, but unintended consequences seem to bite hard.
You are absolutely right saying "digital sovereignty" is not a completely clear concept. The telcos seem to stretch it in a very surprising way.

The official and original idea behind digital sovereignty in the EU is to support individual's control and self-determinism over their own data. The opposing forces — as they are usually seen — are governments and companies. The EU approach has been seen as the "third road" between US's surveillance capitalism and China's tight control. (Probably because we missed the train with the first one and don't really want to take the second one.)

In practice, there are several forces pointing to the same direction:
  • commercially motivated opposition against MAANA (Meta, Amazon, Apple, Netflix, Alphabet)
  • fear of espionage from outside of the EU (I may not need to name the suspects)
  • true privacy ideology
  • putting citizens in control of their data because citizens like the idea
There may be others, as well, but most reasons do not apply to the private relay. The only thing I see is that Apple needs to prove it stores the traffic information (end-user IPs) within the EU.

Different EU countries and different political powers have different concerns and reasons to support digital sovereignty. Some European countries are very concerned about privacy for historical reasons. The very long shadows of the WWII are still there. Some European countries have a relatively flexible interpretation on what is personal data.

Despite these differences in interpretation, the "official Europe", i.e. the European Commission, has usually had a strict view on privacy. If the ideas of digital sovereignty and net neutrality are combined, the telcos' chances of banning Apple's private relay resemble those of the proverbial infernal sphere of compacted icy precipitate.

The EU will, naturally, try and find any good reason to make Apple's life more difficult, but privacy aspects make it very unlikely in this case. (Personally, I find it almost surprising the telcos want to take the risk of drawing attention to their actions. This may trigger some unwanted questions about what they really do.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: VulchR

DrV

macrumors 6502
Sep 25, 2007
271
508
Northern Europe
And now, in the US:

Not very surprising, is it? It seems that T-Mobile is very active on both sides of the pond blocking some traffic.

But is there any operator actually blocking Private Relay in the EU? If there is, then things may get very interesting. I am not a specialist on EU legislation, but that would seem to be in direct conflict with the net neutrality regulation.
 

_Spinn_

macrumors 601
Nov 6, 2020
4,857
10,041
Wisconsin
And now, in the US:

Yeah that figures. This kind of stuff should be illegal. People are paying Apple for this service and T-Mobile is blocking it. Sounds like a lawsuit to me.

Edit: Shouldn’t surprise me I guess coming from a company that does stuff like this:


Network data is just data and it shouldn’t matter which service you are watching. But T-Mobile is giving preference to certain services.
 

gaximus

macrumors 68020
Oct 11, 2011
2,254
4,435
There are 1 billion iPhones sold. That doesn't mean that they're all in use :rolleyes: Especially in this case, this feature precludes anything older than a 6S regardless of the fact that its not out of beta channel, so has less than a few hundred thousand users. Then you have to account for the number of users who never update their devices (ie anyone with the no technical affinity). 844 million, do jog on mate.
844 million is how many people are currently using safari, I'm counting desktop too, because it also supports iCloud relay. More than half of those users are already on iOS 15, and more than 90% on iOS 15 (both of those articles are old, those number have gone up and will continue to go up). There is a reason Google pay $9 billion a year to the default browser on iOS. If private relay is turned on by default, then there will be way more private relay users, than VPN users.

I've linked the sources.
 

justperry

macrumors G5
Aug 10, 2007
12,558
9,750
I'm a rolling stone.
Read the post 'man'. Never said EU, as in any governing body, did anything. I said the EU succccs. And it does.
Screenshot 2022-01-10 at 21.04.49.png




They don't suck because they didn't do anything, by posting this crap you imply they did, period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VulchR

metapunk2077fail

macrumors 6502a
Oct 31, 2021
634
845
They're not making sense. It's just a VPN.

They are also claiming it makes it harder to block illegal content. That makes no sense. Illegal content can still be blocked by whatever platform they stuff is uploaded to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Spinn_

metapunk2077fail

macrumors 6502a
Oct 31, 2021
634
845
Did you even read the article?

Also blockchain? Are you serious? You obviously have no idea how blockchain works if you think it relates in anyway to privacy.
As soon as someone says blockchain it means they don't understand much about tech at all. It's the magical buzzword for Johnny Mnemonic stans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 827538

VulchR

macrumors 68040
Jun 8, 2009
3,401
14,286
Scotland
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Heckles

Knavel

macrumors member
Aug 10, 2021
42
41
There are data residency concerns here; especially with business data.

The solution to this is to have Private Relay servers in EU datacenters, and send EU originating requests to EU servers. It is problematic that data would go from EU to US for private relay purposes only, from purely data residency perspective. This is something that every large service has to navigate.

I do think it is a bit rich / questionable what the driving force behind those complaints is for those carriers, but the concern is technically valid IMO and Apple needs to figure it out.
There's no reason Apple can't provide servers within the EU for relaying EU customer traffic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevez67

one more

macrumors 601
Aug 6, 2015
4,541
5,711
Earth
Now the real question is, why do these providers want to know what I am doing in Safari???

Well, I guess the more of your data & behavioural patterns they collect, the better [for data harvesters]. For example, I do not have a Facebook app installed on my iPhone, but sometimes need to visit it from Safari.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.