Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

4odomi

Cancelled
Jan 19, 2018
1,203
1,218


The European Union has set an official deadline for when all smartphones sold in its jurisdiction must have a USB-C port, including the iPhone.

iPhone-15-to-Switch-From-Lightning-to-USB-C-in-2023-feature.jpg

The EU officially approved the common charger law in October, but a specific date for when the law would come into force was unknown. Now, in a newly published directive, the EU says all smartphones must have USB-C by December 28, 2024. Other consumer products, such as tablets and gadgets, will also be required to switch to USB-C under the new law. Products that rely solely on wireless charging with no port will not have to include USB-C.

Apple's vice president of worldwide marketing, Greg Joswiak "Joz," confirmed that Apple would have no choice but to adhere to the EU's new law. Joz didn't say when Apple would make the switch to USB-C and away from Lightning, but with the December 2024 deadline, Apple could wait until the iPhone 16 in September 2024 before transitioning to the newer port.

Reports suggest that Apple is planning to make the switch to USB-C earlier than the fall of 2024 with the iPhone 15 in September 2023. Other Apple products and accessories such as the AirPods and Mac keyboards, mouses, and trackpads are also expected to follow suit with USB-C shortly after.



Article Link: EU Sets Official Deadline For When iPhone Must Switch to USB-C
Apple could be obtuse and wait until the iPhone 16, however I think that would be a huge mistake, if they do
 

gaximus

macrumors 68020
Oct 11, 2011
2,255
4,439
The EU officially approved the common charger law in October, but a specific date for when the law would come into force was unknown. Now, in a newly published directive, the EU says all smartphones must have USB-C by December 28, 2024. Other consumer products, such as tablets and gadgets, will also be required to switch to USB-C under the new law. Products that rely solely on wireless charging with no port will not have to include USB-C.

Apple's vice president of worldwide marketing, Greg Joswiak "Joz," confirmed that Apple would have no choice but to adhere to the EU's new law. Joz didn't say when Apple would make the switch to USB-C and away from Lightning, but with the December 2024 deadline, Apple could wait until the iPhone 16 in September 2024 before transitioning to the newer port.
Nor did he say that they would switch to USB-C. He just said they would comply. Which could be an iPhone that charges wirelessly only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: user1234

Basic75

macrumors 68000
May 17, 2011
1,986
2,335
Europe
So Apple updated iPhone to fast charge using USB-C to Lightning, but not the data speed? That's very telling!
Yes. The Lightning port is a real joke now. USB 2.0 speeds (just a couple of iPad Pros are capable of USB 3.0 over Lightning) and the HDMI adapter contains a H.264 decompression chip because they can't pump native video over Lightning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .wojtek

SanderEvers

macrumors 6502
Jan 27, 2010
384
1,007
Netherlands
Yes. The Lightning port is a real joke now. USB 2.0 speeds (just a couple of iPad Pros are capable of USB 3.0 over Lightning) and the HDMI adapter contains a H.264 decompression chip because they can't pump native video over Lightning.
The latest iPad has USB-C with USB 2.0 speeds. There is no reason why an iPhone with USB-C will have USB 3.0 speeds.

USB-C is only a connector, it doesn't require a certain transfer rate. You can make an USB-C USB 1.0 port and be spec compliant.
 

LD517

Suspended
Aug 6, 2022
124
67
Apple should have made the move years ago. No reason to stick with a inferior port, unless they have some agreement they want to keep profiting off, like the “made for iPhone”.
That's literally the only reason, profit.....
 

Basic75

macrumors 68000
May 17, 2011
1,986
2,335
Europe
Nor did he say that they would switch to USB-C. He just said they would comply. Which could be an iPhone that charges wirelessly only.
Wireless only is ********. Here's just one reason: Most people would not be able to use CarPlay anymore. And even those with wireless CarPlay might prefer the cable because wired is more stable and reliable than wireless transmission.
 

Basic75

macrumors 68000
May 17, 2011
1,986
2,335
Europe
The latest iPad has USB-C with USB 2.0 speeds. There is no reason why an iPhone with USB-C will have USB 3.0 speeds.
But the iPad Pro has Thunderbolt, DP Alt Mode and USB 3. I'm hoping that Apple realises they will be ridiculed from here to the moon if they release an iPhone "Pro" in 2023 with a new connector but only USB 2 speeds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DEMinSoCAL

User 6502

macrumors 65816
Mar 6, 2014
1,084
4,007
I guess Apple cannot put the superior Thunderbolt 4 on their iPhone's?

I guess the iPad Pro needs to downgrade from Thunderbolt 4 to USB-C because of Europe?
You guess wrong as thunderbolt 4 uses the same connector, hence it’s perfectly acceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .wojtek

4odomi

Cancelled
Jan 19, 2018
1,203
1,218
Apple’s reliance on the lightning connector is a joke. There is no real logic to their choice of connectors across their product line up.
All we should be using by now is USB-C to USB-C leads for everything.
The logic is, they get paid every time a third party lightning connector is sold, for me personally it's a none issue, although I can see how it might be an issue for some, mainly I suspect Android trolls.....from Apples point of view, it's not easy to write off $3 billion annually in pure profit, especially in the current economic climate 😏
 

ScooterComputer

macrumors 6502
Jul 28, 2011
250
330
Apple’s greed has (once again) screwed us all. Lightning is both mechanically superior and electrically-comparable to the Type C connector system. Apple foolishly decided to keep the connector system proprietary while participating in the USB Implementors Forum… they could have given Lightning to humanity, but instead chose to profit from a “walled garden” accessory ecosystem. It is as simple as that: greed.

I have dozens of 30-pin devices, dozens of Lightning devices, and now 3 Type C devices. The failure rate of the 30-pin system was greater than Lightning, by a noticeable margin. I personally have never had a Lightning port failure, only plug or cable failure (less expensive cable-side “repair”), and Lightning port failures I have seen on client devices have been overwhelmingly from physical misuse (dropping directly on a plugged-in device or carelessness), obstruction (pocket lint), or electrical damage (using damaged cables or cheap charger blocks), with legit port failure only a handful of times (and usually always covered under warranty). HOWEVER, of my three Type C devices, two have already had their Type C ports replaced under warranty; and I have seen similar failure rates over the past 5 years with client Apple “Pro” devices. It isn’t even close, Lightning is far superior to Type C in my experience. (Which makes sense, Lightning is a 1x mechanically simpler system.)

Thanks, Tim Apple, for your greed, and the greediness of the Exec team you’ve surrounded yourself with… you’ve made us all worse off. You obviously didn’t even listen to your own engineers, much less push their connector system out to humanity when you had the opportunity. Monumentally stupid. #NotMyApple
 

SanderEvers

macrumors 6502
Jan 27, 2010
384
1,007
Netherlands
But the iPad Pro has Thunderbolt, DP Alt Mode and USB 3. I'm hoping that Apple realises they will be ridiculed from here to the moon if they release an iPhone "Pro" in 2023 with a new connector but only USB 2 speeds.
Would they?

The iPad Pro has Thunderbolt, because the iPad Pro has an M1 or M2 chip. Which has support for thunderbolt.
A-class chips don't have support for thunderbolt, so that is not going to happen.

It might get USB 3.0 support on the iPhone Pro - but I wouldn't hold my breath here. Apple clearly sees wireless transfer above wired data transfer. Otherwise they would've already added USB 3.0 support to the iPhone. Which Lightning actually can (see gen 1 and 2 of the iPad pro)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bacasable

Menel

Suspended
Aug 4, 2011
6,351
1,356
Is apple brave enough, do they have the courage to remove the cable port?

No charge port.
Solid state buttons.
Maybe ditch the mic/speaker ports and only work with bluetooth headphones.
 

rpmurray

macrumors 68020
Feb 21, 2017
2,148
4,319
Back End of Beyond
Couldn't Apple just add a USB-C port for charging only and have the Lightning port for data transfer? I know that sounds like a stupid idea, but this is Apple we're talking about and they are no stranger to doing stupid things.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: nrose101

SRemington

macrumors newbie
Mar 10, 2022
29
70
In my opinion the obstacle for development is the status of the smartphone itself. Apple and their competitors have been milking the smartphone for years now, desperately trying to get as many people as possible to upgrade annually.

However, this is getting more and more difficult because how much innovation can you put into the current design? The only few bits of true innovation left are having 120hz display across all line-ups without a notch or hole punch and camera under display, as well as getting rid of the camera bump. Once that has been achieved, all they would be able to do are annual chip updates for camera and phone. And who would then still want to upgrade annually

Of course they are trying to delay that as much as possible, with a few more or less innovative updates happening every 2-3 years. And in all the other years they re throwing sth like a new MacBook Pro with ProMotion or an Apple Watch Ultra on the market so people stop focussing their attention on how mediocre the iPhone update actually was.

In fact, from my perspective having USB-c or portliness design might even be one of the best innovations in a long time, and we might have the EU to thank for this.
 

icanhazmac

Contributor
Apr 11, 2018
2,544
9,563
Get ready for all the broken ports! Never had a single Lightning port fail but had both sides of my 2017 MBPs USBC ports replaced and those ports got far less use than my phone ports. USBC is no where near as physically robust a connector as Lightning. I guess AppleCare FTW!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jib2 and iOS Geek

Vlad Soare

macrumors 6502a
Mar 23, 2019
666
649
Bucharest, Romania
Unpopular because they make unified charging jack mandatory? Everyone in the world should be happy that the EU has finally forced Apple to abandon the slow and outdated Lightning connector!
The EU does many good things for its citizens, like free roaming in all member countries, roam like at home, I don't have to worry about that when I travel. I can buy goods duty-free throughout the Union, health insurance is valid throughout the Union, and so on.
It's just modern and popular to bash the EU.
Yes. Unpopular because a bunch of fat, useless politicians get to decide what kind of toilet paper we are allowed to use, or how many times a day we are allowed to sneeze.
Nobody's forcing you to buy an iPhone. If you don't like its Lightning port, then don't buy it. There's no need for politicians to force the manufacturers into making something you like. The market should decide this.

I live in the EU and, while I admit it's nice to be able to travel freely and to buy goods duty-free, I loathe the despicable way in which Brussels politicians intrude into all the little aspects of our lives.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.