Took 3 years to build the shard in London (a building of similar height). General practice is to construct the building, have a number of floors completed to allow some clients to move in then finish the remaining floors. That way you can start taking money before the building is completely fitted out. So, you would WANT to have a client like Apple to have a big shiny store to attract other businesses etc.
This building is much taller, much more ambitious engineering wise with the supercolumns, and on a much smaller site. With 70+ stories still needing to be built directly above, and literally zero setback from the entrances, in quite a windy city.
Plus standard practice of stores opening before full completion has always been limited to internal stores, or podium stores very seperated from any fall hazard, even in the most ideal scenarios.
Which is notably different from this proposed store, as its external, so heavy lifts must take place directly above the customer entrances. This building also uses super heavy glass panels, much like an Apple store in fact, so there’s no cheap way to erect a protective structure.
This has never been attempted before. Not anything close, especially right next to an intersection that is probably busier than most well known ones such as Times Square or Shibyua on a per-lane or per square foot of sidewalk basis.
Actually, Yonge and Bloor probably is the world’s busiest intersection on a per square foot of sidewalk basis, certainly of any city that gets snow.
So yeah if it’s somehow pulled off without a hitch this would BE the most ambitious thing Apple has ever done.
Maybe some kind of custom steel outrigging platform that climbs up along with construction?, that would probably make this the worlds most expensive Apple store by far. It would probably be more costly than the next 10 most expensive Apple stores combined! (excluding land costs)
Otherwise it seems unlikely this will be the first ever store Apple tolerates to have heavy objects being maneouvered directly over its customers? Literally thousands of window panes need to be installed over the course of several months on just the 2 sides with store frontage.
Especially as the site constraints means there’s no space to put waiting queues other than directly adjacent to the building.
But it also seems unlikely Apple would give a Toronto real estate developer hundreds of millions of dollars to attempt a world first in urban construction…
The only reasonable answer I can think of, assuming both parties in fact commited to Nov. 2019 or 2021 and weren’t playing games, is if they genuinely expected construction to simply only happen at night on the two sides with retail frontage. If you understand Toronto politics, which a Canadian law firm surely would, this would be impossible to get by as the city also has a very strict no building at night policy in the downtown core.
So yeah the only real explanation is that one or both parties were engaging in some clever date setting…