The serial number requirement would make sense if it was tied to the warranty period, and once the warranty expires then anything goes.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
France Investigating Apple Over Alleged 'Planned Obsolescence' Arising From Serialized Repair Parts
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
"Apple's self-service repair program is bad for the environment given that Apple ships large and heavy tools to customers."
Oh please, gimme a break.
Oh please, gimme a break.
Actually that does happen with some vehicle components. Radios in high end cars will refuse to operate if the serial numbers do not match. Designed to prevent theft. In fact, BMW will disable the radio if the power is ever lost completely in the vehicle.
So it is not just Apple that is taking steps to require serial numbers, or codes, for parts to work properly.
Last edited:
It's a common practice for corporations. They try to shove anti-consumer decisions under a small layer of "positivity" and marketing mumbo jumbo, just to mislead consumers themselves.
Indeed, it's not just Apple, but as far as I understand there is no evidence to suggest that serialization of parts serves as an effective deterrent for theft, at least in a large statistical scale. If you have sources for the contrary, please share. I would love to read on it.
Absolutely. Using a third party part has risks. If something does not work in the device is it the third party part? Or is it something else in the device. Having three parties involved, the repair facility, the part manufacturer, and the device manufacturer, where does the blame fall? Each entity is going to blame the other with no one taking responsibility. The consumer loses.
Okay, so you go to a hole-in-the-wall phone repair shop and they install a third party camera that just happens to be infested by malicious malware that sends your pictures to who knows where. Okay with you?
Reminds me of the printer industry. More and more DRM with every generation of hardware. They asked consumers to ship empty cartridges back, just to destroy them and reduce the availability of third-party and re-manufactured parts. Current HP printers now need a constant Internet connection to accept a print job.
Is Car Window Etching Effective As Anti-Theft Protection?
Wondering If Car Window Etching is Effective As Anti-Theft Protection? Learn about the benefits of etching your car windows and how it can prevent theft. The car window etching process is quick, easy, and affordable. You will also learn about other ways you can prevent car theft in your...
Multiple sources on the web indicating the serializing car parts reduces theft. The same analogy will apply to electronic devices.
... except for the low-RAM iPhones and iPads that, in just few years after launched, became obsolete in the past due to the lack of enough RAM.
Yes, a malware infested camera lens. If they can achieve that level of miniaturization, complexity, and cost, Apple should turn to them instead of Sony for camera modules. 😄
Next thing you'll hear is, don't use third-party MagSafe accessories. Some malware could jump over!
I understand the arguments. This source just restates what has been discussed before. I'm looking for a source, research or otherwise, that statistically shows that the serialization of parts discourages thefts or has resulted in a reduction of theft.Is Car Window Etching Effective As Anti-Theft Protection?
Wondering If Car Window Etching is Effective As Anti-Theft Protection? Learn about the benefits of etching your car windows and how it can prevent theft. The car window etching process is quick, easy, and affordable. You will also learn about other ways you can prevent car theft in your...www.insurancenavy.com
Multiple sources on the web indicating the serializing car parts reduces theft. The same analogy will apply to electronic devices.
Brother printers are almost as bad.
I have a Brother Color laser. The fusing drum failed when it developed a tear. The printer was under warranty. Before Brother would send the part and authorize the repair it was necessary for me to provide the serial number of the toner cartridge and the imaging roller. Brother needed to make certain that only Brother parts were used before they would authorize any repair under warranty.
Using third party toner cartridges or imaging rollers voids any warranty and Brother will not provide parts to repair the printer.
Interesting how this is first looked at as unfair until you see the number of comments that spin it as warranted to prevent repair quality deterioration as well as someone installing cheap substandard parts as a repair.Is Car Window Etching Effective As Anti-Theft Protection?
Wondering If Car Window Etching is Effective As Anti-Theft Protection? Learn about the benefits of etching your car windows and how it can prevent theft. The car window etching process is quick, easy, and affordable. You will also learn about other ways you can prevent car theft in your...
Multiple sources on the web indicating the serializing car parts reduces theft. The same analogy will apply to electronic devices.
While this is theoretically possible, it is extremely hard and costly to implement, and there would be several indicators to show this is happening (such as battery drain). Not to mention this would require having multiple security exploits to iOS to allow it to do what you said.
I guess you have never heard of "Juice Jacking".
Juice jacking: Why you should avoid public phone charging stations
Hackers can load malware into charging stations at place like airports and malls, allowing them to steal the data of unsuspecting users, experts warn.
www.nbcnews.com
There is firmware in the MagSafe cable. I just recently did an update. So it may be technically possible. I also think the NBC News article was sprinkled with a lot of sensationalism. The UEFI boot BIOS was thought to be very secure. Yet is has been compromised on some MSI motherboards.
Basically impossible as there have not been un-serialized parts in use in Apple devices. That is what the EU wants to happen. The EU demands will have to take place before statistics can be gathered.
if it wasn't because of planned obsolescence, our data will already be encrypted remotely by Russian/Chinese/North Korean/Uganda ransomware and I wouldn't be able to access my beloved Excel files and my old photos of me eating Trix cereal
Macrumor’s wording here is a bit of a misrepresentation. HOP is critiquing that the self-service repair kit is very expensive and inconveniently heavy (79 lbs in total), which discourages its use. This is a fair criticism. They don’t tie it directly to a negative environmental impact.
I would think that Apple would only deem the device fit for purpose if it contains genuine parts while still under warranty, because they can't guarantee it with third-party parts. After the warranty expires you can have at it with whatever black market parts you can find, because it's no longer Apple's problem.
I guess you have never heard of "Juice Jacking".
Juice jacking: Why you should avoid public phone charging stations
Hackers can load malware into charging stations at place like airports and malls, allowing them to steal the data of unsuspecting users, experts warn.
Everyone has heard of juice jacking. The difference is it's a USB or Lightning port designed to communicate all sorts of data.
A camera module is designed to send only pixel data with near zero possibility of an exploit. It would be like a MacBook Pro getting malware through the HDMI port.
It's situations like this where some people know little about tech but try to extrapolate and end up completely wrong.