No need to end WFH. Replace low performers with high performers. Problem solved.Can we correlate working from home with poor software quality? Then end the WFH.
No need to end WFH. Replace low performers with high performers. Problem solved.Can we correlate working from home with poor software quality? Then end the WFH.
Is that really a productive and nice thing to say? Come on, let’s keep MR forums a pleasant place to come to. There’s no benefit in attacking people.Who knows. I wish all the pansies would stay home for good personally. We all know they can’t drive for .
"In the world" gets touchy for anyone who works with sensitive data, but certainly "in the country" (that applies to more than just the US)Plus a lot of quitting. People are used to working remotely these days. Unless you have to be there to get your job done there’s no reason to go back to the office for 40+ hours a week anymore. There’s a labor shortage right now. Most boomers who left the workforce aren’t coming back which would be a challenge on its own without combining that with going up against competition who allow you to work remotely.
Plenty of us have moved on and aren’t going back to that model. Forward thinking companies that employe all remote workers where possible can pick from the best minds in the world. People who otherwise couldn’t or wouldn’t work for said employers precisely because they can’t relocate for family or other reasons more important than their day job become eligible members of a company’s workforce.
Correlation doesnt equal causation. Given most pre-COV19 studies found productivity was better with WFH and hybrid approaches, and that most companies did decently well productivity-wise during the pandemic, I'm inclined to wager any declines in productivity came from, you know, living through a global pandemic and not from WFH.Can we correlate working from home with poor software quality? Then end the WFH.
I read they had rules about taking photos... it must be at some designated desk with a number on it. I know others in similar boats.. they work at companies with proprietary information, and government sites with classified information and equipment.I know I won't be going back any time soon. Maybe in a hybrid fashion, but that's about it. That's going to be the future for all devs unless you're Apple (or any company with heavy NDAs and no chance of brining high profile equipment / software back home with you).
Even Apple here in Culver City has openings that specifically say "in person". Totally understandable knowing how secretive they can be.
Time to consider a new employer!My company is back 4 days a week and I hate it.
Back to office politics, gossip...all the crappy parts of work you get to avoid at home.
And gas in the tank issues, traffic..
EVERYONE I speak to at my company is miserable back in the office.
Morale was up when everyone WFH, and people tended to 'always be on'.
That ends back in the office, so now people are miserable and working less.
But yay for all the folks who had to work at site the whole time. Hope you like the additional traffic..
The number of vaccinated Americans who have died of COVID remains lower than the number of Americans who die on the highways every year.2000 deaths a day in the US, still
Your nonsense on every single article of this site is getting tiresome.They should have been returned back to the office long time ago. The retail workers are working on site. No reason to stay home anymore.
Look at her posting history, and you'll see why the inability of 'doing better' is a forgone conclusion..Some industries (retail, service, etc) very obviously cannot work from home, the fact that you're even using this logic is astronomically silly. Do better.
Why? Put COVID aside—why would your blanket requirement still make sense for everyone?At this point, everyone should be required to go back to work.
Vaccines work
Masks work
COVID is going to be here forever, so you might as well learn to coexist with it like we did with flu.
Care to expand on how "development" is hurt?If true that we still allow working from home in a massive way, productivity increases but development is hurt.
I'm in your exact same situation. It's motivation for me to spend the time looking for higher pay and a job that is completely remote.My company is back 4 days a week and I hate it.
Back to office politics, gossip...all the crappy parts of work you get to avoid at home.
And gas in the tank issues, traffic..
EVERYONE I speak to at my company is miserable back in the office.
Morale was up when everyone WFH, and people tended to 'always be on'.
That ends back in the office, so now people are miserable and working less.
But yay for all the folks who had to work at site the whole time. Hope you like the additional traffic..
Is that really a productive and nice thing to say? Come on, let’s keep MR forums a pleasant place to come to. There’s no benefit in attacking people.
You didn't complain for two years, but now you make big stinky in the forums in your little boy pants. ?Sorry but I put my big boy pants on every day through this whole thing to move freight and didn’t complain. Restrictions are being lifted everywhere and some want to question about a return to the office? Wake up it’s time to stop being a little $$!? and get back to life. Sorry but the sympathy train departed long ago.
6 years ago I applied for a full remote position at Apple.Sorry but I put my big boy pants on every day through this whole thing to move freight and didn’t complain. Restrictions are being lifted everywhere and some want to question about a return to the office? Wake up it’s time to stop being a little $$!? and get back to life. Sorry but the sympathy train departed long ago.
Why should anyone be up in arms about employees getting to work. It’s great companies are going carbon neutral, but they can’t control what their employees do.Funny concept. People have proven that they are capable of doing a job remote. Companies continue to maintain the office space throughout that time. Once the pandemic is "over" they require everyone to come back. These same companies speak about green initiatives and climate change as a part of their business plans nowadays. With apple they are vowing to go 100% carbon neutral. Anyone up in arms in that management about the millions of people returning back to vehicles spewing CO2 on highways en route to and from the office? Nope.
And for many jobs increased productivity. Nothing is black and white.Aside from this, families will go back to spending less time together, more money on child care, more wasted time spent behind the wheel or on a train, earlier hours to rise and less sleep.
Because not every company is the same. Not every dept, job and manager is the same.If you are capable of working remotely, and have proven for two years that you can do your job to the same degree you could inside an office, why not continue that status quo?
Must be a reflection on your work environment.1 word: control.
As opposed to wfh where one has to stay in front of the computer for 14 hours to prove they were working?The office is the bread and butter for micromanagers and HR professionals. Back to someone clamoring for "butts in seats by 8am" and questioning your 5 minutes overrun on the lunch "hour".
Two points: multitasking in a meeting is bad, imo. Sick employees should not be at work period.Back to meetings where you can't multitask and have to sit in the breath of those who are sick but have run out of sick time.
I hate open office concepts but not for the reason above.Back to the "open office concept" where when one person has a cold, 5 days later the entire row does simply because the company doesn't want to pay for cubes anymore.
Why should anyone be up in arms about employees getting to work. It’s great companies are going carbon neutral, but they can’t control what their employees do.
And for many jobs increased productivity. Nothing is black and white.
Because not every company is the same. Not every dept, job and manager is the same.
Must be a reflection on your work environment.
As opposed to wfh where one has to stay in front of the computer for 14 hours to prove they were working?
Two points: multitasking in a meeting is bad, imo. Sick employees should not be at work period.
I hate open office concepts but not for the reason above.
I don't think I need a better job opportunity. I was pointing out that, imo, there is false logic in the quoted post and maybe the commentary reflected what is going on in your particular work environment. Additionally, those that feel very strongly about return to office, seems that there are an abundance of opportunities out there for that person.I infer you need a better job opportunity. I sense discontentedness underneath your arguments. With a worker shortage, it's a great time to trade up.
Choo choooooooo. LolSorry but I put my big boy pants on every day through this whole thing to move freight and didn’t complain. Restrictions are being lifted everywhere and some want to question about a return to the office? Wake up it’s time to stop being a little $$!? and get back to life. Sorry but the sympathy train departed long ago.
Not only that but the positions being paid more not having to come in.. A solid amount of management and engineers out of office while operations is always here with higher expectations..Love all the whiners.... some of us never stopped going into the "office" (nurse here). Time to get back to work... tired of being short handed because people are crying about having to actually leave the house to earn a paycheck.