Imagine what users could do then if for a few bucks more on Apples part, the base memory was 12GB or 16GB?Been posting this for a few years:
With the m-series Macs,
16gb is "the new 8" ...
Ok I will make the call then. There are quite a few of us and we are called customers.That is not your call to make.It IS sufficient for light users.
Yes, if it were $600, fine. Also, if RAM upgrades weren't $200 for an additional 8GB, that'd be fine.If the MacBook Air with 8 gigs was selling for under $600, than yes 8 is enough. Beyond that needs to have more, it is getting hard to find PC laptops at Apples price points that have less than 16
That could be the difference. I've been talking about desktop use. I refuse to buy another Macbook ever. I've had my share of issues over the years with them and find them to be the worse tech purchases (based on my first-hand experiences)I would do that. I had tried using ASUS zenbook 14 and while was a great machine with that OLED screen 16GB of RAM, intel i7 13th gen processor the battery life and screen brightness wasn't enough. The battery would be lucky to get 7-8 hours and the screen topped off at 500 nits for HDR while SDR was around 400.
Also plenty of people just rather deal with MacOS than windows. I personally use both but I needed a laptop that lasts a while and great screen.
This is like a Michelin starred restaurant who have peasant customers come in and complain their meal was too little. You want upgradable memory, SSD, etc then there are few options. The business of apple is profits. It’s not about how you feel about their upselling and price gouging. You’re buying the brand buddy. You have other choices go there.Ok I will make the call then. There are quite a few of us and we are called customers.
That's what I used to say. I bought a 16 GB MacBook back in 2017 because I figured my memory usage would go up over time. I'd say that at that time 8 GB was perfectly fine the vast majority of the time, but very occasionally (<5% of the time), having more could help a bit because of very heavy multitasking. 8 GB would still work, but during those heavy multitasking sessions, I'd get occasional slowdowns.That's the problem. You shouldn't focus on what you need now but what you might want to use it for in the next few years. I am not spending $1000+ on a laptop for only using it for 2-3 yrs. its the principle of the fact Apple should give us 12GB min of storage in 2024
Why can’t those users buy a nice laptop if they want. Especially considering they probably will use it for many years.And these users should just a tablet as there is no reason whatsoever to spend 1000 dollars or more to browse and watch videos or playing music.
discussions about the adequacy and value of this configuration.
I knew someone would post something like this. It seems people don't quite understand how macOS works. I don't claim to be an expert either, but I can tell you macOS is designed to use as much memory as possible. If you have less, it will use less and compress more. (This memory compression does not involve the SSD. That's completely different.) If you have more it will try to use as much of it as possible, and with less compression. Fortunately, the performance hit with memory compression is not noticeable for usage such as with web browsing or email or business applications.Safari uses nearly half of that with one tab open. Any M series is sharing over 1GB of RAM with video. Run out of RAM and have to use the SSD, then wear that out too. Great setup for a "premium" machine using subpar parts.
Your customers didnt know they need bto with more ram. Not apple faults that some customers dont know what they needSafari uses nearly half of that with one tab open. Any M series is sharing over 1GB of RAM with video. Run out of RAM and have to use the SSD, then wear that out too. Great setup for a "premium" machine using subpar parts.
Over the years of selling Apple gear, nearly all of the customers returning Apple hardware did so because Apple hobbled the hardware with some obtuse bottleneck.
No offense, but I don't see upgrading my computer every few years as a problem. You stated you wouldn't spend $1K on a laptop and only use it 2 or 3 years. I would, as computer purchases are my one true splurge every 3 or 4 years. To each their own.That's the problem. You shouldn't focus on what you need now but what you might want to use it for in the next few years. I am not spending $1000+ on a laptop for only using it for 2-3 yrs. its the principle of the fact Apple should give us 12GB min of storage in 2024
You must have been a very wealthy student.Apple computers are cheaper now then any point in the company history I wish there was a $1,0000 Mac when I was in college.