Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286

I posted this for 3 reasons:
1, I want to show you guys some things I've tried out and want some new tricks that you've tried. 2, I want your opinion on whether these gloriously old beauties are obsolete.
3, I am shamelessly promoting my new channel sparked tech.

So, what is your opinion? Is PowerPC obsolete? Is there anything I can do to make my PPC better? Let me know! And while you're at it, tune into my new channel Monday evening for a podcast.
 

eyoungren

macrumors Penryn
Aug 31, 2011
28,858
26,991
Not to be rude, but this question might be more appropriate over in the Intel Mac forums.

Kind of strange to ask here in the PowerPC forum when the majority of users here USE PowerPC.

I mean, I use my PowerBook and my PowerMac everyday.

As far as making PowerPC better…SSDs, SATA PCI, USB 2.0 PCI/PC cards, CPU upgrades. So, lots you can do to make your Mac better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeatOSX

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
Not to be rude, but this question might be more appropriate over in the Intel Mac forums.

Kind of strange to ask here in the PowerPC forum when the majority of users here USE PowerPC.

I mean, I use my PowerBook and my PowerMac everyday.

As far as making PowerPC better…SSDs, SATA PCI, USB 2.0 PCI/PC cards, CPU upgrades. So, lots you can do to make your Mac better.

I know you use PowerPC. Which is why I think the question is most importantly directed to this forum. You guys are in the PPC world everyday. Surely you've felt it age a little. I'm not trying to be insulting, I just want opinions. And I meant software optimization. But thanks for the hardware tips.
 

MultiFinder17

macrumors 68030
Jan 8, 2008
2,723
2,047
Tampa, Florida
A piece of equipment is only obsolete when it no longer performs the functions that you require of it. A PowerBook still meets my needs in my classroom, and it does not impede my students education, so for my needs it is not obsolete. If I were a video creator making HD videos, then yes, the PowerBook would be hopelessly obsolete.
 

8692574

Suspended
Mar 18, 2006
1,244
1,926
If only i could put an ssd in my iMac G4...... I am sure it would be cool!
 

ziggy29

macrumors 6502
Oct 29, 2014
495
323
Oregon North Coast
What is meant by "obsolete"? If you mean something that is pretty much unsupported, where little to no new commercial development is taking place, then yes. If you mean unusable, not at all useful any more and not capable of doing any of the day-to-day tasks that many users perform, then the answer is still a resounding no.

That said, IMO, they are obsolete for some tasks and perfectly useful for others. (For some applications, even older PPC Macs running OS 9 are still useful!) And as a hobbyist looking for ways to extend life of old Mac hardware and do things with older Macs that are supposed to be "incapable" of them, no, the fun (and occasional frustration) of the challenge is never really obsolete.

I have newer Macs when I need the power that I use on a regular basis for most things (see signature for partial list). But sometimes I still enjoy returning to my older Macs to play around a bit, to tinker "under the hood", to try to improve the performance and run old software that doesn't run on Intel Macs running El Cap. And enjoyment is never obsolete, either.
 
Last edited:

Dronecatcher

macrumors 603
Jun 17, 2014
5,209
7,795
Lincolnshire, UK
And enjoyment is never obsolete, either.
Exactly the point. If you want click and go, trouble free bang up to date computing, yes, they are obsolete.
If you enjoy finding a bargain, customising, tailoring hardware and software to your needs, optimising to the nth degree - then they're far from obsolete.
In fact, I'd say PPC is thriving - there always seems to be a new hack around the corner that squeezes out a few more CPU cycles of usefulness.
I'm still using PPC exclusively - not because I'm a nostalgia zealot but because all my needs are addressed, and for the moment any spare cash that could be used for a Mac Pro is better spent on my other interests.

Although your video addresses general use, don't forget these Macs are incredible for recording and producing music - so if nothing else, a Mac at a pocket money price gives you a multitrack recording studio with low latency hardware and rock solid software.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobesch

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
I didn't expect this thread to have so many answers. You guys are absolutely right, I just kinda expected everyone to hate the question and move on. Wow. But no seriously, is there any software I missed? Besides music making because honestly I don't have a musical talent in my body aside from singing. Is there anything I could be doing that would make my PowerBook even cooler?
 

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,325
6,402
Kentucky
I have software on my Quad at work that I use for writing exams and things like that.

One specific software package(Chemdraw) is available for Intel computers, but it's freakishly expensive. On the other hand, I've used "scavenged from the trash" versions for a while now on PPC computers.

I have an SL Server virtual machine on my Macbook Pro with Chemdraw(along with Office 2011) installed and it's workable, but nothing beats actually using it on real hardware. The end results are the same as if I'd used something newer, but I can get it done faster and more efficiently running natively on a PPC computer.

I have some other specialized scientific software that either never made the jump to Intel(sometimes not even to OS X) or if it did is freakishly expensive.

Finally, I maintain a G4 tower at work that's operating a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectrometer. This is an older instrument and is highly specialized(as NMRs go). For anyone who cares, it's a solid state NMR with a 500mhz(proton) wide bore magnet to support magic angle spinning, and all the probes for it are custom-built by the PI who operates the instruments or his grad students. There's really no modern replacement that would allow him to continue his research(and even if there was, it would be a quarter million dollar or more investment).

In any case, the software for this instrument runs only on OS 9. In fact, he was told that it wouldn't run on 9.2.2, but it ended up working fine. It's enough of a customized install that I actually kept an image of it after the last hard drive crash so I wouldn't have to go through the song and dance of getting it working again. The software has to "talk" to a National Instruments PCI card, so classic mode isn't really even an option.

We've also been pushing the speed barriers on it. The 466mhz Digital Audio he was using for lost its power supply, and to just try and get things online again, I grabbed a 733mhz Quicksilver that was sitting in the room. It caused a somewhat bizarre situation-the software would send the pulse signals to the instrument(we could observe them on an oscilloscope), the instrument would respond with its signal-called a free induction decay(FID) that we could also observe on an oscilloscope, but the computer wouldn't "see" the FID. "Downgrading" the Quicksilver to 466mhz(from the dead DA) actually fixed it. I've been working on putting together a few surplus computers for him so that we can switch with minimal downtime if necessary. I've also been promised dinner at any restaurant in town of my choosing sometime soon :)
 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
I have software on my Quad at work that I use for writing exams and things like that.

One specific software package(Chemdraw) is available for Intel computers, but it's freakishly expensive. On the other hand, I've used "scavenged from the trash" versions for a while now on PPC computers.

I have an SL Server virtual machine on my Macbook Pro with Chemdraw(along with Office 2011) installed and it's workable, but nothing beats actually using it on real hardware. The end results are the same as if I'd used something newer, but I can get it done faster and more efficiently running natively on a PPC computer.

I have some other specialized scientific software that either never made the jump to Intel(sometimes not even to OS X) or if it did is freakishly expensive.

Finally, I maintain a G4 tower at work that's operating a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance spectrometer. This is an older instrument and is highly specialized(as NMRs go). For anyone who cares, it's a solid state NMR with a 500mhz(proton) wide bore magnet to support magic angle spinning, and all the probes for it are custom-built by the PI who operates the instruments or his grad students. There's really no modern replacement that would allow him to continue his research(and even if there was, it would be a quarter million dollar or more investment).

In any case, the software for this instrument runs only on OS 9. In fact, he was told that it wouldn't run on 9.2.2, but it ended up working fine. It's enough of a customized install that I actually kept an image of it after the last hard drive crash so I wouldn't have to go through the song and dance of getting it working again. The software has to "talk" to a National Instruments PCI card, so classic mode isn't really even an option.

We've also been pushing the speed barriers on it. The 466mhz Digital Audio he was using for lost its power supply, and to just try and get things online again, I grabbed a 733mhz Quicksilver that was sitting in the room. It caused a somewhat bizarre situation-the software would send the pulse signals to the instrument(we could observe them on an oscilloscope), the instrument would respond with its signal-called a free induction decay(FID) that we could also observe on an oscilloscope, but the computer wouldn't "see" the FID. "Downgrading" the Quicksilver to 466mhz(from the dead DA) actually fixed it. I've been working on putting together a few surplus computers for him so that we can switch with minimal downtime if necessary. I've also been promised dinner at any restaurant in town of my choosing sometime soon :)

Not trying to sway your feelings from Mac, but why not use a Raspberry Pi if you need lower power? They're 5 volts and the Model A had a 500MHZ processor out of the box. Not to mention it's $25. Just a thought.
 

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,325
6,402
Kentucky
Not trying to sway your feelings from Mac, but why not use a Raspberry Pi if you need lower power? They're 5 volts and the Model A had a 500MHZ processor out of the box. Not to mention it's $25. Just a thought.

Did you read what all I said about the requirements? I need that specific computer to natively run OS 9 and I have to be able to directly access a PCI slot. I'm pretty sure there's no way a Pi could satisfy either of those requirements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: laylow

Dronecatcher

macrumors 603
Jun 17, 2014
5,209
7,795
Lincolnshire, UK
Is there anything I could be doing that would make my PowerBook even cooler?
Graphic design - a top end Powerbook easily runs Adobe Creative Suite 4.
Film editing - if you have 2005 vintage video hardware, that's what Macs were made for.
Emulation - apart from games as you've mentioned, a Powerbook can perfectly emulate a high end Amiga (with access to thousands of apps and games plus a still active community). Other 8/16 bit systems and of course, through Virtual PC, various flavours of Windows.
 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
Did you read what all I said about the requirements? I need that specific computer to natively run OS 9 and I have to be able to directly access a PCI slot. I'm pretty sure there's no way a Pi could satisfy either of those requirements.


Of course I read the requirements. Requirements can change. Access to a PCI slot can be done. Just takes an adapter. What am I saying? Just stick with the PM
[doublepost=1465565540][/doublepost]
Graphic design - a top end Powerbook easily runs Adobe Creative Suite 4.
Film editing - if you have 2005 vintage video hardware, that's what Macs were made for.
Emulation - apart from games as you've mentioned, a Powerbook can perfectly emulate a high end Amiga (with access to thousands of apps and games plus a still active community). Other 8/16 bit systems and of course, through Virtual PC, various flavours of Windows.

I can edit with footage from my iPhone on the PowerBook. Drag clips over, convert them in Voltaic HD, and then edit in final cut express (cause I can't find a copy of pro anywhere)
 

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,325
6,402
Kentucky
Of course I read the requirements. Requirements can change. Access to a PCI slot can be done. Just takes an adapter. What am I saying? Just stick with the PM

Well, you were the one who suggested the Pi, and I'm still trying to work out how to get OS 9 running natively on an ARM processor.

BTW, we've tracked the issue to requiring a 7400 series chip and not working with a 7450 series chip.

I don't expect requirements to change since the instrument is now well over 15 years out of support.
 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
Well, you were the one who suggested the Pi, and I'm still trying to work out how to get OS 9 running natively on an ARM processor.

BTW, we've tracked the issue to requiring a 7400 series chip and not working with a 7450 series chip.

I don't expect requirements to change since the instrument is now well over 15 years out of support.

It's actually possible to run OS 9 on virtually anything using QEMU or Oracle Virtualbox. Could you trick the script into thinking you're running a 7450 instead of a 7400? I tricked my PowerBook clone I had put on my MacBook into thinking it was still a G4. Anything is possible in OS X. Especially older versions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leon771

Bug-Creator

macrumors 68000
May 30, 2011
1,770
4,704
Germany
PowerPC is about is about as obsolete as recording UTube-videos blabbering about wether why and how PowerPC is obsolete.
 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
It's actually possible to run OS 9 on virtually anything using QEMU or Oracle Virtualbox. Could you trick the script into thinking you're running a 7450 instead of a 7400? I tricked my PowerBook clone I had put on my MacBook into thinking it was still a G4. Anything is possible in Mac OS. Especially older versions.
[doublepost=1465566487][/doublepost]
PowerPC is about is about as obsolete as recording UTube-videos blabbering about wether why and how PowerPC is obsolete.

Let me stop you there. I had to ask myself this question back in 2014 and the only person that had answered it was the iBook guy. He had made a video in 2011 (you know, back when leopard was still supported?) My friend Matt and I had both been suckered into buying G4's. I had never owned a Mac, nor did I know anything about them. Shocking, I know, since I've caught on pretty quick. I bought an EMac G4 for $50, he bought an iMac G4 Luxo for $125. His sat on a shelf for 2 years until he finally wound up giving it to me. I on the other hand made my EMac do everything I set out to do. Then MacTubes failed, Spotify announced they would stop support soon and I gave up. I made the video to show people how to work around problems. I made the video to tell people it's okay to buy these machines still. Also, it's YouTube and whether. If you're going to smart off on my thread, at least use proper grammar.
 

bunnspecial

macrumors G3
May 3, 2014
8,325
6,402
Kentucky
It's actually possible to run OS 9 on virtually anything using QEMU or Oracle Virtualbox. Could you trick the script into thinking you're running a 7450 instead of a 7400? I tricked my PowerBook clone I had put on my MacBook into thinking it was still a G4. Anything is possible in OS X. Especially older versions.

I still-once again-need a real PCI card and direct access to it. By far and away the easiest way to do that is to use physical hardware that can natively boot into the OS.

I'm also still wondering about these supposed PCI adapters for the Pi-I can't seem to find any!
 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
I still-once again-need a real PCI card and direct access to it. By far and away the easiest way to do that is to use physical hardware that can natively boot into the OS.

I'm also still wondering about these supposed PCI adapters for the Pi-I can't seem to find any!

More like PCI to USB. Either way, if I can be any help fixing or optimizing your machine, let me know
[doublepost=1465567955][/doublepost]
Not everyone is English around here, y'know.

My apologies, that was very 'Merican of me
 

eyoungren

macrumors Penryn
Aug 31, 2011
28,858
26,991
I know you use PowerPC. Which is why I think the question is most importantly directed to this forum. You guys are in the PPC world everyday. Surely you've felt it age a little. I'm not trying to be insulting, I just want opinions. And I meant software optimization. But thanks for the hardware tips.
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be rude.

It's just that I use these Macs every day so the question to me is odd. If they were obsolete I would not be able to use them.

But yeah, I've felt the pressure of time. Loss of support, workarounds, failing parts, etc. But for what I am using them for they are still very capable.

Not sure what specific software type tips you are looking for.
 

LightBulbFun

macrumors 68030
Nov 17, 2013
2,810
3,125
London UK
@Adamscomputerrepair even if you could get PCI on a Pi (and there are Non Pi ARM boards with PCI(e) ) you would still run into the issue of the Pi being an ARM machine with OS9 being PPC32 based and say you did managed to fire up OS9 in QEMU (keeping in mind QEMUs ability to boot OS9 is quite broken atm) you would still run into the issue of passing through the PCI devices to the emulated machine if this was Virtual machine (say a G5 running Linux then you MIGHT be able to do it Much like VT-D) but being ARM-PPC Pure emulation i doubt you can do it. if your feeling bored feel free to watch this video by me

 

Adamscomputerrepair

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2015
549
286
Sorry, I wasn't trying to be rude.

It's just that I use these Macs every day so the question to me is odd. If they were obsolete I would not be able to use them.

But yeah, I've felt the pressure of time. Loss of support, workarounds, failing parts, etc. But for what I am using them for they are still very capable.

Not sure what specific software type tips you are looking for.


Nah man it's cool. A few people have said this is an odd question
@Adamscomputerrepair even if you could get PCI on a Pi (and there are Non Pi ARM boards with PCI(e) ) you would still run into the issue of the Pi being an ARM machine with OS9 being PPC32 based and say you did managed to fire up OS9 in QEMU (keeping in mind QEMUs ability to boot OS9 is quite broken atm) you would still run into the issue of passing through the PCI devices to the emulated machine if this was Virtual machine (say a G5 running Linux then you MIGHT be able to do it Much like VT-D) but being ARM-PPC Pure emulation i doubt you can do it. if your feeling bored feel free to watch this video by me


You make a good point. And I'm not bored but I'll watch the video anyway. I assume most of you have probably watched mine. It's only fair right?
 

Bug-Creator

macrumors 68000
May 30, 2011
1,770
4,704
Germany
I made the video to tell people it's okay to buy these machines still.

Reasons to buy PPC (or better PPC-Macs):

- nostalgia
- special use cases (OS9,MorphOS or SW that just won't work with Rosetta)
- to intregrate into an allready PPC-heavy Mac-environment

Everyone else is better of buying an (early) IntelMac.

Says the Klown surrounded by (counting puters not CPUs):
2x G5
6x G4 (5x Apple 1 other)
1x 5200B (603 based SoC)

Maybe more hiding in some utility HW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobesch
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.