having to plug it in every night makes this thing impractical for everyone except the most devoted Apple fans.
I'm not sure why having to plug it in at night is a problem?
I'd probably plug it in when (and where) I plug in my phone...
Gary
having to plug it in every night makes this thing impractical for everyone except the most devoted Apple fans.
All of that you can do better on your phone. Do we really need to be glued to our gadgets 100% of the time? It's bad enough as it is. Is the terrible inconvenience of taking something from your pocket worth spending hundreds of dollars to save yourself 1 or 2 seconds? Especially when interacting with this new device is more complicated.
It's just another thing to worry about constantly charging, getting wet or breaking.
Perhaps the next gen will improve the limitations just enough to make it worth it, but I think it may just be a gadget too far.
I think you've restricted yourself to hardware configurations. The millions is inclusive of all device configurations.
but they will soon tire of it.
For myself I can say: I'm interested, but I'm not excited. Maybe I'll give it a try. Maybe I'll wait and see what the next iterations will bring.
"Millions and millions?" Jony and Tim cannot do math.
3 different watch metals
6 different bands
18 unique watches total
Assuming 20 different digital watch faces:
Total unique watches is < 400!
I hate bad math.
I have a $6,500 Tag Heuer Monaco - it has a self winding mechanism but if I don't wear it every day then I have to wind it. It has the same dimensions as the Apple WATCH. The Monaco has been in production for longer than I have been alive and I waited 10 years to buy it. Charging/winding is irrelevant.
The crown on my Monaco protrudes as much as the Apple WATCH and has never been knocked and damaged.
I don't sleep in any watch I have ever owned - they all go into a bowl on my desk and I choose what to wear in the morning - if anything. The Apple WATCH will probably replace them all unless I want to wear a watch for the love of them.
During the work day? Absolutely.Do we really need to be glued to our gadgets 100% of the time?
SteveJobs: Jony..don't you get it?... The camera sticks out!...#
All of that you can do better on your phone. Do we really need to be glued to our gadgets 100% of the time? It's bad enough as it is. Is the terrible inconvenience of taking something from your pocket worth spending hundreds of dollars to save yourself 1 or 2 seconds? Especially when interacting with this new device is more complicated.
It's just another thing to worry about constantly charging, getting wet or breaking.
Perhaps the next gen will improve the limitations just enough to make it worth it, but I think it may just be a gadget too far.
I haven't even touched one and I can already see where a watch such as this would be useful. I own a fairly successful company and as such I get a *lot* of calls, texts, emails and FB messages all of which require that I remove my phone from my back pocket and see what's going on. Many times I am talking with someone and have to do so. How convenient would it be to simply glance at my wrist and decide whether I want to respond? Secondly, I referee youth soccer most weekends. When I do so, business doesn't stop and the calls, texts, emails etc. continue to come in. Once again, I find myself constantly pulling my phone out of my pocket to see what's going on. ....and once again how convenient would it be to glance at my wrist to do so. I'm already wearing a watch to keep track of game time so an Watch is simply adding additional functionality to an existing device and isn't that what much new tech is all about? Thirdly, I go to the gym 5 days a week to stay in shape and I listen to music while working out. Many times I find myself, once again, pulling my phone out of my pocket to change songs or check incoming texts, emails or calls. I think you get the point. These are just *3* of the ways I find this device useful and that's without even touching one.
As far as tech nerds go, I take what they say and what they think with a grain of salt. For the most part, these guys are *stuck* on specs and you know as well as I do that the vast majority of peeps don't give a fat rat's arse about specs. They want a device that feels decent in the hand and makes their life a little easier or enriches an already full life. ....and IMO, this is precisely why Apple is a leader in the industry. I'm not going to get into all of the nuances of smartphones and the differences between Android devices vs. Apple devices. That being said, I've owned just about every current Android device (Nexus 5, Galaxy S5, HTC One M7 & M8) and I *always* return to the iPhone because of the nuances I won't get into.
Rant over.
For now.
Were you not here during the iPad keynote? How everyone said there is no need for a giant iPod touch? How we already have phones and a laptop? That there is simply no need or real benefit for the iPad? How do people forget so quickly? You're the same guy that is gonna line up for the Apple Watch 2 just like everyone lined up for an iPad 2 when it ironed out all the kinks from iPad 1.
I see it as a new companion device that will do incredibly well in terms of sales and will continue to evolve and improve. Like all tech, it will become thinner, lighter and more robust in terms of function. Is it for everybody? Nope. There are those who will find no use for it and rightfully so. ....but the same thing can be said for just about any form of tech *including* smart phones.You've outlined the benefits well! I can see how it would work for you. I don't think that it applies to the majority though.
You're also right about the tech nerds, but I brought them up because nerds are supposed to be excited about new tech in general. It seems many are not, and a lot of people can't see a use for this thing.
My post concluded with me saying that I don't think it'll be the product category that the smartphone and tablet became, and I still think that's true.
----------
Calm down, I'm sharing my opinion. You don't need to be rude, and you definitely shouldn't be making assumptions about people you know nothing about.
I didn't think the iPad was useless at all when it was announced, I thought it would be a great casual browsing device. It did go on to replace low-end laptops for casual users; so tell me, what do you think the watch will replace? Do you see it having the global acceptance over time that the phone and tablet do? Just by virtue of it being an accessory device, I don't think that's possible.
Sport is the entry model.
It is lighter aluminum for weight. The Watch is the one with SS and Sapphire.
The naming on that is odd, it should be the other way around. SPort or Pro denomination usually mean it is better.
I think what the WATCH does that the renders didnt do is reflect the reality that a watch needs to cling to the body - everybody whose arms are different.
I'm still gutted over this Apple Watch. I've been scouring the forums and sites for months, desperate to buy one. I couldn't wait for the cutting edge design, multiple sensors, a fantastic health and fitness watch- I could dump my Garmin. This would do everything. In addition I'm a big fan of Joni Ive, seeing what he has achieved at Apple is remarkable. I even bought his recent biography the day it came out.
Boy, was I looking forward to this watch, credit card at the ready.
What do we get? Something that looks aesthetically average.
It needs an IPhone for everything- and even then it has to be an iPhone 5 up.
It doesn't even have GPS in it- why have a sport model? Which runner really wants a phone in their pocket. I can't even wear it in the shower, never mind keep it on in the pool etc. At the gym, I don't want to be taking my watch off to get in the shower. At the beach or by the pool on vacation I don't want to have to take it off and leave it in my bag- ripe for theft.
The multiple sensors turn out to be a heart rate monitor- already done, yawn. Where is the sweat analysis, blood glucose etc?
It's battery looks like it will last a day at best.
The wireless charging we had heard about, perhaps even working from some distance away? Sorry sir, you have to clip a charger to the back of it, but hey, it's magnetic. Another wire I have to have cluttering up the room.
I suspect the software (has Jony spent most of his time on this) will work well and look nice. I do wonder is Jony is spreading himself too thin and this is the result? Or is Jony only half of a high achieving double act, which was more than the sum of its parts?
Forgive me for the negativity, but I am so disappointed in nearly every aspect. Hopefully this will be a stepping stone to what the Apple Watch should be in itineration number 2.
This is a $1500 'designer' watch:
Image
Design is subjective. I showed the Apple watch to my girlfriend (who is not a geek) and she thought it was stunning.
Also: Companies like Apple influence fashion.
----------
Those are cheap jibes at the moto 360. Of course the processor is going to be more limited than on the latest smartphones. The battery thing is a bit odd.
We need to compare these devices on real world experience and use, not on technical specs.
Blood glucose monitor lol
C'mon dude.
Such a thing is not even possible at the moment without pricking into your skin.
Er no- just Google it my friend!