The point being, there are many other examples of successful revolutions around the world like the Haitian revolution
Uh, not sure about that one.
The point being, there are many other examples of successful revolutions around the world like the Haitian revolution
I think you are confusing me with someone else… I am definitely in the "enraged" camp.Please post your sources so we can have a civilized conversation.
But let's go with your numbers:
Even with 1/3 of the population being infected (110M) that would put the current mortality rate at 0.58% (640k/110M). Even if we conservatively assume that all of those 110M come from the unvaxxed population (they don't - many of those infections were before the vaccine too).... that would still leave 46M unvaxxed people that haven't been infected ((330M - 174M vaxxed) - 110M).
At a 0.58% mortality rate that means 267,000 people will still die.
If all of them got the vaccine that would drop to 37,380 (edit: see my earlier source here saying the vaccines are still 86% effective at preventing hospitalization and death). To me - a jab in the arm is worth 230,000 American lives. Many of the 640k that already died would have also been saved if everyone would have gotten vaxxed as soon as they could.
You throw around 800,000 (more like 870,000 with the numbers above) like it's no big deal. Do you realize that that is more American deaths than all of the foreign wars we've ever fought _combined_? How angry were you that 13 soldiers died in Afghanistan last week? More than that have died from COVID too. How are you not enraged?
I raced to my keyboard to reply to this comment before it expired. I hope I replied soon enough to not be considered pedantic.
So do you think government should regulate our diets too? Like NYC limiting soda sizes, etc? Sorry, but that is pure government overreach supported by people who want a nanny state.
I think you are confusing me with someone else… I am definitely in the "enraged" camp.
I did not "backtrack"... I was showing that _even if_ the mortality rate were lower than the source I posted says it is... you would still be wrong. My own personal interpretation of the data is that the mortality rate is between 1%-2% for most of the developed world.
I showed multiple reliable sources that say that, at worst, the vaccines are still 86% effective at preventing hospitalization and death.
Using those two pieces of information it's easy to show that millions of lives can be saved by a vaccine mandate.
You saying "the 'experts' don't know the answers" is meaningless. Post a source. Post a number. Do literally _anything_ to support your position. Or admit that you are wrong.
Time to update your numbers:
65% and falling, and that’s among healthcare workers, not old people.
Not that type of business.So you haven't really done business in China.
This one definitely isn’t pedantic, since you didn’t attempt to refute anything.
Yeah, limiting consumers' video game time reeks of capitalism. Maybe there are no IAP in China?Yeah, because it is "communist" only in name. You don't really see "common ownership" of "the means of production" in China, do you? Or the "absence of social classes"? Gini index is actually higher for China than for the US.
China is "communist" in the same sense that East Germany was "democratic" (German Democratic Republic), i.e. just a label. China left communism with Deng Xiaoping in 1980, and has since become a pragmatic state capitalist country with a solid foundation in confucianism.
Capitalism is an economic system, and has nothing to do with how a government limits gaming.Yeah, limiting consumers' video game time reeks of capitalism. Maybe there are no IAP in China?
An economic system is nothing unless it is governed by enforceable law. The government creates the laws and enforces them.Capitalism is an economic system, and has nothing to do with how a government limits gaming.
Try to open a casino, and you'll see what I mean.
Hello Chinese Intelligence! Get lost. Did the AI you've been training on all the stolen US data come up with the name WoodpeckerBaby? Or are you the AI?That’s manufactured lies by the CIA. If, to this day, you still can’t see it through, you have a bigger problem to worry about.
Nicky G sounds a lot more spammy to me.Hello Chinese Intelligence! Get lost. Did the AI you've been training on all the stolen US data come up with the name WoodpeckerBaby? Or are you the AI?
There is something called the Butterfly Effect, i.e., Chaos Theory.Wow, this thread has taken a turn. I thought we were just talking about teens playing online too much…
An economic system is nothing unless it is governed by enforceable law. The government creates the laws and enforces them.
My point is the Chinese government is not made up of capitalists, because this is not how capitalist governments govern their people.
There is something called the Butterfly Effect, i.e., Chaos Theory.
Neither socialist nor happy, actually.The Scandinavian nations are all socialists, and they are the happiest nations on earth. Modern China since the 1970s is also Socialist.
This is due to reporting bias. I wouldn't give it too much credit.Neither socialist nor happy, actually.
Question:Apple's parental control is broken for anything accessed through a web browser.
"In other news, the US government passed a bill forbidding the use of social media on mobile devices, citing public safety risks from distracted driving and inattentive pedestrians, and privacy concerns that passersby are being photographed without consent through the use of so-called selfies. Business leaders applaud the bill, citing low productivity from employees "being paid to scroll Facebook." Anyone caught using a social media site or app on a smartphone or tablet will be fined and possibly face jail time."They should do that here.
I guess the rationalization is that China's move is OK because "it's for the children"?
I'd also argue the schooling requirements, but I do agree with alcohol/tobacco age limits (although they're pointless for the most part). Play is important, and learning when enough is enough is important as well. It shouldn't be mandated by government (honestly, some games today take almost an hour just to get up and running, and you can't just stop in the middle of something without losing hours of work). Besides, watching my nephew really get into gaming right now, the problem isn't entirely the game (though I'd like for him to play something else). He spends every waking minute that he's not otherwise occupied on TikTok. That has to be way more damaging to him than playing the game, if for, at the very least, the game is interactive. Making him go for 2 minutes off the phone and just sit and wait is a challenge. The game, he gets tired of after a while, but that phone and TikTok, he just gets completely absorbed. I've fought and lost that battle a few times.That’s already the rationalization for requiring 13 years of school, minimum ages for booze and tobacco, etc., etc.