Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

pshufd

macrumors G3
Oct 24, 2013
9,982
14,455
New Hampshire
I have to download the installer again but it's running much haster now, 12 MB/S. I can't believe how many people are trying this out.
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
I have to download the installer again but it's running much haster now, 12 MB/S. I can't believe how many people are trying this out.
try to download just now 33 minute more .. install on my imac 2017. m1 will be stable macos for testing apps.
 

Pri-est

macrumors regular
Feb 5, 2020
140
300
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Successfully Installed MacOS 12 Beta on Mac Pro 3.1
Got full Installer by system updates and install on clean partition of my PCI-AHCI SSD.
Installation process - Without Issues.
OCLP 0.1.6.

Снимок экрана 2021-06-08 в 05.49.40.png
Снимок экрана 2021-06-08 в 05.34.27.png
Снимок экрана 2021-06-08 в 04.16.44.png
Снимок экрана 2021-06-08 в 04.16.59.png
Снимок экрана 2021-06-08 в 04.36.28.png

 
Last edited:

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
Installation started: About 1 hour and 22 minutes remaining. I don't know if I'll stay up for this.
4 minute remaining . hehe . oh no . wrong update big surr update again.. download
 
Last edited:

jonblatho

macrumors 68030
Jan 20, 2014
2,513
6,215
Oklahoma
Tried to install using a test partition on my late 2014 5K iMac and got an error during the update that the startup disk could not be verified. The update didn’t succeed; I’m back on my regular Big Sur installation. Now the EFI seems to be somewhat goofed — my screen resolution options appear to correspond to those of a 4K iMac instead of 5K:

Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 11.10.45 PM.png

Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 11.01.42 PM.png


My Big Sur installation is otherwise untouched and working as usual.

Any advice, y’all? I’m torn between trying again on a test partition just running the installer from my Big Sur installation instead of Recovery, biting the bullet and just running the installer for my main installation to see if it gets fixed somehow, or just leaving it be unless there’s a good way to undo this.

Edit: System Information still recognizes my display correctly, if that counts for anything:
Screen Shot 2021-06-07 at 11.22.53 PM.png
 
Last edited:

pshufd

macrumors G3
Oct 24, 2013
9,982
14,455
New Hampshire
Tried to install using a test partition on my late 2014 5K iMac and got an error during the update that the startup disk could not be verified. The update didn’t succeed; I’m back on my regular Big Sur installation. Now the EFI seems to be somewhat goofed — my screen resolution options appear to correspond to those of a 4K iMac instead of 5K:

View attachment 1788976
View attachment 1788977

My Big Sur installation is otherwise untouched and working as usual.

Any advice, y’all? I’m torn between trying again on a test partition just running the installer from my Big Sur installation instead of Recovery, biting the bullet and just running the installer for my main installation to see if it gets fixed somehow, or just leaving it be unless there’s a good way to undo this.

If the OS is disposable or you have a TM backup, go for it. It depends on how badly you need the existing OS.

I've never seen a Mac with so many resolutions before.

If you have a lot of RAM, you could go with VMware or VirtualBox.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho

seanmcgpa

macrumors newbie
May 12, 2008
19
1
Hi guys,

I have an iMac 14,2 (27-inch, Late 2013) , NVIDIA GTX 780M with 4GB, 1 TB SSD which runs Big Sur flawlessly.

Could anyone with the same setup report back if Monterey can be installed? I looked through the thread but didn't see any mention of 14,2.

THANKS!

Sean from Philly
 
  • Like
Reactions: sprihoda

alfon_sico

macrumors regular
Oct 3, 2015
230
78
Hi, don’t forget to help the group that using Mac Mini late 2012. Thanks.
Mac mini 2012 works with micro patcher. First look, it is very slow. Not sure maybe a mix of causes, first beta, graphics kext etc, by the moment it’s unusuable

I can’t apply kext patch for wifi, it needs more time to investigate
 

pshufd

macrumors G3
Oct 24, 2013
9,982
14,455
New Hampshire
I'm stuck in a boot loop on the installation. It may be something to do with installing on a second partition while there's a Mojave installation on the primary disk. I'm going to shoot it, blow away the Virtual Machine and try again directly to the primary partition tomorrow.
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
Screenshot 2021-06-08 at 1.28.21 PM.png


safari really odd lol. rendering pretty slow.

update_dyld_sim_shared_cache - high usage proc
 
Last edited:

David dongfox

macrumors member
Jul 26, 2020
75
59
Mac mini 2012 works with micro patcher. First look, it is very slow. Not sure maybe a mix of causes, first beta, graphics kext etc, by the moment it’s unusuable

I can’t apply kext patch for wifi, it needs more time to investigate
Hi,you mean already try installed this new OS into your Mac mini ?
 

LuisN

macrumors 6502a
Mar 30, 2013
733
683
Torres Vedras, Portugal
For anybody wondering: At this time, I am planning on creating a brand new patcher for Monterey. I plan on using a fully native approach (IE not using OpenCore), and supporting only Metal-comptible systems (2012 and later, plus older systems with upgraded video cards). If this ends up being a huge pain I may reconsider, but as of now I will start working on a patcher within the next few weeks.
Welcome back
 

D0cB3y

macrumors newbie
Jun 7, 2021
4
0
Has anyone tried on a MacBookPro 11,1? I'm not at home so I'm creating an install drive using OCLP 0.1.7 with preliminary Monterey support using team viewer and a vm.
 

adaml75

macrumors newbie
Oct 22, 2011
3
0
So nVidia Kepler cards still work in Monterey? What chances are that they will remove support in the final release? (But then we can use drivers from beta, can't we?)
 

Bmju

macrumors 6502a
Dec 16, 2013
669
751
Many thanks for your work gathering all this info and updating the patcher!

Should MBP10,x be added to the list of "potentially capable of being patched " on p.1? Also, I guess, should all the models in "newly dropped" be in "potentially patched" too?
 

mac_editor

macrumors newbie
Jun 7, 2021
5
16
Seattle, WA
So nVidia Kepler cards still work in Monterey? What chances are that they will remove support in the final release? (But then we can use drivers from beta, can't we?)
Yep. I would imagine they will remove the drivers from final release as it would be pointless to include them. As you suspect though, we should easily be able to inject the drivers down the line if required.

 

Bmju

macrumors 6502a
Dec 16, 2013
669
751
is it possible to make text bigger in retina hd4000?

will opencore legacy patcher fix that later?

thx

I have the same problem, MBP10,2 refusing to run in retina 2x mode, so yes, all text is tiny.

Also, I'm running a basic 'no kexts' OC (I previously updated my Wi-Fi card to a supported one), just spoofing SMBIOS BoardProduct, and Monterey installed fine (no boot loops).

I did get the thing where the whole screen went black with just a cursor and a (tiny!) white spinning wait icon at one point (after successfully installing), but I think other machines are getting that too?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trinfa
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.