Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

bay200

macrumors newbie
Mar 20, 2024
2
1


While the Apple Pencil is currently compatible with iPads only, a future version of the accessory may work with Apple's Vision Pro headset.

Apple-Vision-Pro-and-Apple-Pencil-Feature.jpg

Apple has internally tested a new Apple Pencil with visionOS support, according to a source familiar with the matter. This would allow the Apple Pencil to be used with drawing apps on the Vision Pro, such as Freeform and Pixelmator.

No specific details are known about this project, but one possibility is that users would be able to draw with the Apple Pencil on a desk or another flat surface, and the drawing would appear in the open visionOS app. This would essentially turn a person's surroundings into a giant canvas, complete with pressure and tilt sensitivity.

A new Apple Pencil is rumored to launch alongside new iPad Pro and iPad Air models in April, but we have not confirmed if it will support visionOS.

Apple Pencil compatibility with the Vision Pro would also require updated software, but it is unclear which version might add support. The first beta of visionOS 1.2 will likely be made available to developers as early as this week, and Apple is expected to announce visionOS 2 at its annual developers conference WWDC in June.

As with any product that Apple develops, there is no guarantee that the company will move forward with releasing an Apple Pencil with visionOS support.

Article Link: New Apple Pencil With Vision Pro Support in Testing Ahead of visionOS 2
If this comes to Mac too I will never get an iPad upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive

Lounge vibes 05

macrumors 68040
May 30, 2016
3,582
10,521
It’s tenuous to base your argument not on the actual device in front of you but on wild speculation about it that may or may not come to fruition.
You are literally posting that comment on an article about a product that doesn’t exist yet,
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive

deconstruct60

macrumors G5
Mar 10, 2009
12,302
3,894
You realize you’re just talking about the very first generation?

Shallow misdirection. The same "but you are only looking at the current generation" assertion is equally as true for the iPad. A future VP has to catch a future iPad; not the iPad from now or 2-3 years ago.



Yes, the first generation Apple Vision Pro does not have a cellular modem, and does not have as long of battery life as the iPad does.

The battery gap problem and the cellular modem are coupled. Current iPhones largely get better battery life than the original iPhone because they are bigger (i.e., have a bigger battery). The Vision Pro can't really play that game. It is already so big you have to attach it to a external module with a wire. If want to 'hand wave' at a magical future battery that can store more power with less weight, then the iPad can get that too and the gap will still be there.

The Vision Pro has both a Mn and a Rn SoC in there. Tossing a Rn and a cellular modem into the VP is always going to consume more energy than tossing just a cellular modem into an iPad. The Rn presence is very likely going to keep a cellular modem out of the device for an extremely long time. (Wi-Fi tethering to a Phone (or iPad) is likely going to be the 'escape route' path that Apple pursues. ).


The original iPhone was limited to edge networking and (according to most of the reviews from the time) could get about 2 to 3 hours of screen on usage.
Things change, things evolve, things get better.

Yeah it got better by getting bigger and heavier. Two paths that the VP is pragmatically blocked on; as it is at the limits of "too big , too heavy" to rest on a head for hours at a time.


In 2039, which is the year I’m going with because that’s the length of time it took the iPhone to completely cannibalize the iPod and caused it to be discontinued, it is very likely that the Vision Pro will have cellular connectivity (or satellite connectivity if that’s taken off yet) and much more than the advertised two hours of battery life that it has now.

Basic physics and basic economics aren't going to change in 2039. The middle-upper range iPad have the same SoC as the Vision Pro. The magical future 2039 SoC that the VP gets is very likely going to be matched by the iPad.
All of the magical 2039 tech that extends battery life and gives the VP more computational 'horsepower' at lower energy consumption will be applied to the iPad also. More affordable high resolution screens ... ditto. Better voice recognition for system interaction ... probably coming to other Apple products, including iPad, also . etc. etc.



Again, you’re thinking in terms of the Vision Pro as it exists in 2024.
And even in 2024, there are people in this exact thread who have said that the Vision Pro basically replaced their iPad.

The standard macrumors go to of telling someone else what they are thinking when the person has said no such thing at all.

There are other threads where some narrow subset of folks said they replaced their Macbook with an iPad and yet the Macbook are still around. There are some folks who replaced their Mac Pro 2010 with a Macbook Pro and yet the Mac Pro is still around also.

In 2007, the 8 GB iPhone was not replacing peoples 160 GB iPod classics that could get 40 hours of audio playback.
Today, you can get an iPhone with a terabyte of storage that gets an advertised 95 hours of audio playback.
Again, the Apple Vision Pro might never replace the iPad, certainly isn’t going to do it within the next five years.
But stop thinking in this box of what the Vision Pro is today, the battery life it gets today, the lack of cellular modems today.
That is all obviously going to change there’s going to be a second generation, and a third generation, and a fourth generation, and so on.

The person suffering from mental short sightedness here is largely you. The iPad is going to change; which you are not accounting for at all. Those storage gains referenced above ... the iPad would get excluded how? Not at all.

The $200-300 iPod touch basically got replaced by the $200-300 iPad. Bigger screen and an optional celluiar modem that had utility for a far larger group of people.

Apple's shift to an open ( available on multiple platforms) and streaming music model access (e.g., acquired Beats in 2014) had a bigger impact on the death of the iPod ( in 2015-2022 for 6th-7th gen ) than the iPhone. Throw in the price reduction of plain iPad and those are bigger contributors.


The general iPod had its heyday when the music you bought from Apple was DRM so that the iPod was a easy access (affordable) way to play the music. When that DRM leash started to fade (both in numbers and scope of media that could be sold (apps, video, etc.) ) , so did the iPod.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey

jole

macrumors 6502
Feb 6, 2004
347
461
USA
More than anything, I want an Apple Pencil that is compatible with the Magic Trackpad,

Great idea. Instant buy from me.

It might require eink display inside trackpad to be usable as writing device.

More than anything, I want an Apple Pencil that is compatible with the Magic Trackpad, but they won't do it because it's direct competition to a Wacom tablet. And Wacom would pull support.

Wacom cannot ignore Mac market. I think there would be very little chance of them pulling support.
 

doelcm82

macrumors 68040
Feb 11, 2012
3,766
2,776
Florida, USA
One of their primary differentiators is that it doesn’t have or need controllers. All I’m saying is that making the pencil into an ad hoc controller kind of goes against how they’re positioning it.
The iPad doesn't come with a pencil. You can use an iPad without one. iOS is designed to be used without a stylus. That's how they positioned it. Steve Jobs even included a stylus in the iPhone keynote, as a joke.

Vision Pro doesn't need the Apple Pencil in the same way that it doesn't need AirPods Pro. It's an accessory (a rumored one).
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive

G5isAlive

Contributor
Aug 28, 2003
2,604
4,504
Shallow misdirection. The same "but you are only looking at the current generation" assertion is equally as true for the iPad. A future VP has to catch a future iPad; not the iPad from now or 2-3 years ago.

2d thinking. You’re assuming progress is linear when in every category of tech we see it is logarithmic, with the AVP being at the start and the iPad already matured. In ten years an iPad is still going to look like an iPad, the AVP has the potential to be something different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doelcm82

Surf Monkey

macrumors 603
Oct 3, 2010
5,588
4,206
Portland, OR
The iPad doesn't come with a pencil. You can use an iPad without one. iOS is designed to be used without a stylus. That's how they positioned it. Steve Jobs even included a stylus in the iPhone keynote, as a joke.

Vision Pro doesn't need the Apple Pencil in the same way that it doesn't need AirPods Pro. It's an accessory (a rumored one).

You’re missing my point.
 

G5isAlive

Contributor
Aug 28, 2003
2,604
4,504
The Apple Pencil is specifically designed for the iPad.

You did read the title of this article right "New Apple Pencil With Vision Pro Support in Testing Ahead of visionOS 2." seems to make it clear the new Apple Pencil is being designed with the AVP in mind. You can quibble on definitions of pencil and brush, but call it what you will, no one knows for sure how it will be used but it should be interesting.

Hard to say whether they’d expand Pencil’s capability like that. Wouldn’t it represent a concession that the Vision needs controllers?

Seems more a concession the AVP will take advantage of alternative methods for input for specific applications, like they already do with the blue tooth keyboards for text input. Yes you can input text with a virtual keyboard, no doubt paint with your fingers too, but sometimes there is a tool for that. You will say I miss your point, I will say you are trying to score points on a made up issue, and life will go on.

You will never own a AVP, I do, and I am looking forward to seeing what the new Apple Pencil will do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doelcm82

subjonas

macrumors 603
Feb 10, 2014
5,541
5,870
Right now there are very limited use cases for the VP for 2D artists, so if this Pencil works well (and is real), it could be a big deal for them, and widen the market for the VP for Apple. It’s a niche group but I imagine a sizable one.
But I’m perplexed how this thing would work. Indirect drawing only, where you look at one thing and draw on another? Actually one can already do this in VP’s virtual Mac display with a Wacom tablet. Or will it be air drawing? I hope neither because I’ll go out on a limb and say these are dealbreakers or nonstarters for most pros. I hope Apple has a better solution, even if it means it will require another device like an iPad to be used while using the VP.
And if the Pencil could be used with Mac applications via the VP, that would be an even bigger game changer. But in that case I hope it doesn’t require an iPad because that would be too many devices to deal with every time.
 
  • Love
Reactions: G5isAlive

G5isAlive

Contributor
Aug 28, 2003
2,604
4,504
Right now there are very limited use cases for the VP for 2D artists, so if this Pencil works well (and is real), it could be a big deal for them, and widen the market for the VP for Apple. It’s a niche group but I imagine a sizable one.
But I’m perplexed how this thing would work. Indirect drawing only, where you look at one thing and draw on another? Actually one can already do this in VP’s virtual Mac display with a Wacom tablet. Or will it be air drawing? I hope neither because I’ll go out on a limb and say these are dealbreakers or nonstarters for most pros. I hope Apple has a better solution, even if it means it will require another device like an iPad to be used while using the VP.
And if the Pencil could be used with Mac applications via the VP, that would be an even bigger game changer. But in that case I hope it doesn’t require an iPad because that would be too many devices to deal with every time.

I just want to say thank you for some actual thoughts for discussion.. it's rare these days. I am concerned that to make this really work there has to be some fundamental software upgrades beyond just making it connect, and not sure Apple is there yet. But I can imagine with its mapping capabilities that it could lead to virtual pieces of paper/canvas being anywhere there is a solid surface. Guess we will find out in June.
 
  • Like
Reactions: subjonas

Surf Monkey

macrumors 603
Oct 3, 2010
5,588
4,206
Portland, OR
I'm disagreeing with your point.

Having a specialty controller that is useful in some situations (such as a physical keyboard or a stylus) is not the same as being designed around that controller and being useless or barely usable without it.

But it goes against Apple’s marketing. That’s my point.
 

G5isAlive

Contributor
Aug 28, 2003
2,604
4,504
But it goes against Apple’s marketing. That’s my point.

Except that it doesn't. Apple's marketing, or really anyone's, is not designed to cover all uses and instances. They don't say you will never need or want any other input device, they say you can control it with your hands. The latter does not imply the former unless you are closing your mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doelcm82

MarkDeMoss

macrumors newbie
May 24, 2012
16
50
All the rumors of the Apple Pencil 3 almost enough for a name change, seems way more than a pencil.

I just sold my Apple Pencil 2 for parts only on ebay for $20. Lithium battery inside died due to not charging it/using it.

I didn’t use the first gen apple pencil either. Suppose I’d use it more if it went inside the keyboard rather than the loose magnet, but overall I found it to be less useful than my fingers.

Hoping the new Magic Keyboard for iPad has a better way of carrying it with the keyboard without adding too much bulk. Certainly will be buying it if it works with Vision Pro. Also will be neat if it has ”find my” feature.

If it’s just swappable magnetic tips for people to draw on ipad only, then I’ll skip it this time around.

Remember to charge your Apple Pencils, they become ”bricks” if you let them sit.
 

Surf Monkey

macrumors 603
Oct 3, 2010
5,588
4,206
Portland, OR
All the rumors of the Apple Pencil 3 almost enough for a name change, seems way more than a pencil.

I just sold my Apple Pencil 2 for parts only on ebay for $20. Lithium battery inside died due to not charging it/using it.

I didn’t use the first gen apple pencil either. Suppose I’d use it more if it went inside the keyboard rather than the loose magnet, but overall I found it to be less useful than my fingers.

Hoping the new Magic Keyboard for iPad has a better way of carrying it with the keyboard without adding too much bulk. Certainly will be buying it if it works with Vision Pro. Also will be neat if it has ”find my” feature.

If it’s just swappable magnetic tips for people to draw on ipad only, then I’ll skip it this time around.

Remember to charge your Apple Pencils, they become ”bricks” if you let them sit.

Ouch. That kinda sucks. I use mine a lot so I haven’t had battery issues but that would make me pretty upset. The darn thing should be able to be a little neglected without bricking.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.