You realize you’re just talking about the very first generation?
Shallow misdirection. The same "but you are only looking at the current generation" assertion is equally as true for the iPad. A future VP has to catch a
future iPad; not the iPad from now or 2-3 years ago.
Yes, the first generation Apple Vision Pro does not have a cellular modem, and does not have as long of battery life as the iPad does.
The battery gap problem and the cellular modem are coupled. Current iPhones largely get better battery life than the original iPhone because they are bigger (i.e., have a bigger battery). The Vision Pro can't really play that game. It is already so big you have to attach it to a external module with a wire. If want to 'hand wave' at a magical future battery that can store more power with less weight, then the iPad can get that too and the gap will still be there.
The Vision Pro has both a Mn
and a Rn SoC in there. Tossing a Rn
and a cellular modem into the VP is always going to consume more energy than tossing just a cellular modem into an iPad. The Rn presence is very likely going to keep a cellular modem out of the device for an extremely long time. (Wi-Fi tethering to a Phone (or iPad) is likely going to be the 'escape route' path that Apple pursues. ).
The original iPhone was limited to edge networking and (according to most of the reviews from the time) could get about 2 to 3 hours of screen on usage.
Things change, things evolve, things get better.
Yeah it got better by getting bigger and heavier. Two paths that the VP is pragmatically blocked on; as it is at the limits of "too big , too heavy" to rest on a head for hours at a time.
In 2039, which is the year I’m going with because that’s the length of time it took the iPhone to completely cannibalize the iPod and caused it to be discontinued, it is very likely that the Vision Pro will have cellular connectivity (or satellite connectivity if that’s taken off yet) and much more than the advertised two hours of battery life that it has now.
Basic physics and basic economics aren't going to change in 2039. The middle-upper range iPad have the
same SoC as the Vision Pro. The magical future 2039 SoC that the VP gets is very likely going to be matched by the iPad.
All of the magical 2039 tech that extends battery life and gives the VP more computational 'horsepower' at lower energy consumption will be applied to the iPad
also. More affordable high resolution screens ... ditto. Better voice recognition for system interaction ... probably coming to other Apple products, including iPad, also . etc. etc.
Again, you’re thinking in terms of the Vision Pro as it exists in 2024.
And even in 2024, there are people in this exact thread who have said that the Vision Pro basically replaced their iPad.
The standard macrumors go to of telling someone else what they are thinking when the person has said no such thing at all.
There are other threads where some narrow subset of folks said they replaced their Macbook with an iPad and yet the Macbook are still around. There are some folks who replaced their Mac Pro 2010 with a Macbook Pro and yet the Mac Pro is still around also.
In 2007, the 8 GB iPhone was not replacing peoples 160 GB iPod classics that could get 40 hours of audio playback.
Today, you can get an iPhone with a terabyte of storage that gets an advertised 95 hours of audio playback.
Again, the Apple Vision Pro might never replace the iPad, certainly isn’t going to do it within the next five years.
But stop thinking in this box of what the Vision Pro is today, the battery life it gets today, the lack of cellular modems today.
That is all obviously going to change there’s going to be a second generation, and a third generation, and a fourth generation, and so on.
The person suffering from mental short sightedness here is largely you. The iPad is going to change; which you are not accounting for at all. Those storage gains referenced above ... the iPad would get excluded how? Not at all.
The $200-300 iPod touch basically got replaced by the $200-300 iPad. Bigger screen and an optional celluiar modem that had utility for a far larger group of people.
Apple's shift to an open ( available on multiple platforms) and streaming music model access (e.g., acquired Beats in 2014) had a bigger impact on the death of the iPod ( in 2015-2022 for 6th-7th gen ) than the iPhone. Throw in the price reduction of plain iPad and those are bigger contributors.
The general iPod had its heyday when the music you bought from Apple was DRM so that the iPod was a easy access (affordable) way to play the music. When that DRM leash started to fade (both in numbers and scope of media that could be sold (apps, video, etc.) ) , so did the iPod.