Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mr. Retrofire

macrumors 603
Mar 2, 2010
5,064
519
www.emiliana.cl/en
I think it is macOS Mammoth.

Mammoth Mountain was part of the Sierra National Forrest. Eastern portions of Sierra National Forest became the Inyo and Toiyabe National Forests.

Apple used
"Yosemite" (National Forrest) for OS X 10.10.x,
"El Capitan" (in the Yosemite National Forrest) for OS X 10.11.x
and
"Sierra" (National Forrest) for macOS 10.12.x.

macOS 10.14.x is probably macOS "Sequoia".

mammoth.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: JeffyTheQuik

tyr2

macrumors 6502a
May 6, 2006
826
217
Leeds, UK
My guess is 'macOS 11'. No more names, line it up with iOS and tvOS, it's the perfect opportunity. They are all currently 10.x. something so why not move them all to 11. Especially after renaming OS X -> macOS last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ck2875

JeffyTheQuik

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Aug 27, 2014
2,468
2,407
Charleston, SC and Everett, WA
I think it is macOS Mammoth.

Mammoth Mountain was part of the Sierra National Forrest. Eastern portions of Sierra National Forest became the Inyo and Toiyabe National Forests.

Apple used
"Yosemite" (National Forrest) for OS X 10.10.x,
"El Capitan" (in the Yosemite National Forrest) for OS X 10.11.x
and
"Sierra" (National Forrest) for macOS 10.12.x.

macOS 10.14.x is probably macOS "Sequoia".

What about Mavericks?

I do like Mammoth!
[doublepost=1496578602][/doublepost]
La Jolla? Eureka? Death Valley?
Yreka would be fun too!
[doublepost=1496579190][/doublepost]
"Sausalito" would be a good name but probably cause same issues.
If they ever used Washington names, I guess "Puyallup" would have the same issue...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.