Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Questionable Claim of 30% Slimmer 'iPad Mini Air' Launching in Late 2014
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Stay tuned.
I'm learning to like my retina Mini, especially now that a couple of school-related apps finally work in the environment. I still cannot do everything with an iPad, but the weight reduction would be very nice. Would I upgrade? Probably not, but less weight, better screen(colors) and battery life would certainly make me think twice.
I'm learning to like my retina Mini, especially now that a couple of school-related apps finally work in the environment. I still cannot do everything with an iPad, but the weight reduction would be very nice. Would I upgrade? Probably not, but less weight, better screen(colors) and battery life would certainly make me think twice.
We'll of course many have been thinking about this for years, but how do you eliminate the seams?
The iPad mini always had the air-like aesthetics, it's the full size iPad that adopted the form factor from the mini.
Well yeah. Still though, saying "Air-like" to describe a product that already couldn't be any more like their other "Air" designated products is just silly. The only way they could make the retina iPad mini more like the current iPad Air is to give it the ever-so-slightly faster iteration of the A7 (not important) or to give it the color gamut of the iPad Air's display (which would be significant and awesome). The display on the iPad Air is way way way nicer than the one on the retina mini dispite greater pixel density on the latter.
But making a thinner desktop computer? Only Apple could not only pull that off, but think it was worth doing in the first place!
Make the iPad bendable and unbreakable. That would be something new. Rehashing the same old same old with incremental upgrades and thickness dimensions asymptotically approaching zero inches at the sacrifice of actually IMPROVING battery life is just craziness.
The New Apple iPad mini Air 3 with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Cellular for T-Mobile 16GB - Space Gray
Now that's a short memorable name.
The New Apple iPad mini Air 3 with Retina Display Wi-Fi + Cellular for T-Mobile 16GB - Space Gray
Now that's a short memorable name.
I'm afraid that won't happen. Air itself is already Retina
:O 5.5mm ? How wide is a headphone jack? There comes a point where we're going to have trouble plugging anything in.
Since when has Apple ever cared about conforming to standards?
There was that rumour a while ago about Lightning headphones...
I could see Apple doing this, but unless they have something totally awesome in the works that would mean that Apple headphones and earbuds were the best ever, and you would never want anything else, I really hope they don't. Nobody wants to have a Lightning to 3.5mm adapter handing off their iPad.
In terms of a super thin, flexible iPad, has anyone considered how HORRIBLE that would be to use??? The only way I could see this being practical is if it was built to be rigid up until a certain (large) moment was applied to the device, at which point some structural members deform, allowing it to bend. Surely nobody wants to work on something large and floppy in their hands *insert euphemism joke here*...
I've no problem with using Samsung tablets. They look pretty good in the shop. I'd rather stick with the iPad but if they don't release a bigger version what else is there to do. I've switched to mainly cloud apps so it really doesn't matter what hardware I'm using any more.
The most successful technology company in the history of mankind wants to disagree.
Isn't that exactly what they are doing? Now only after they have developed a smaller battery-saving A8 processor, they make the device thinner while keeping the same great battery life. What you demand is that new technology should not lead to redesigned products. So product innovation stops at big and heavy.
They look pretty good in the shop is a good description of why I accepted the Tab 3 when it was offered to me. Since then Ive come to a crucial realization. Samsung devices have pretty nice screens. Very bright, very colorful. An argument could be made that they're oversaturated and that you lose crispness as a result, but the fact remains that in short term use, their tablets look and feel pretty good. And Im sure youd love the big screen they put on the Galaxy Pro.
But after living with one for about a year, a second realization hit home. The custom kernal of Android that Samsung puts on there, along with all of their pre-loaded services, completely negate whatever hardware features drew you to the device in the first place. The software is so bad, in fact, that my quad-core, full-HD, barely-a-year-old tablet has become a tiny Netflix portal I use only when my laptop battery is nearly dead. There have been times when Ive deliberately chosen to watch tv shows on my phone simply because the user interface on that tablet was so bad and I just wasnt in the mood to deal with it.
In short, the software they load on those things makes the hardware look bad, and in my use case, renders the whole thing completely useless. This is the kind of thing you cant get just looking at it in the shop.
The most successful technology company in the history of mankind wants to disagree.
Isn't that exactly what they are doing? Now only after they have developed a smaller battery-saving A8 processor, they make the device thinner while keeping the same great battery life. What you demand is that new technology should not lead to redesigned products. So product innovation stops at big and heavy.
Apple is putting industrial design ahead of engineering. Folks at Cupertino feel that there are benefits to an even thinner iPhone. This comes at the expense of packing in a much larger battery. The benefits of a thinner iPhone elude many members here or we simply reject the trade off and prefer that Apple simply maintain the profile of the iPhone 5 and pack in a bigger battery. But instead Apple has elected to slim down the industrial design forcing both software and hardware engineers to compromise and actually work to find a viable means of battery efficiency.
Only one of these methodologies can be properly called innovation.
I've done some sketches and worked out how that could actually work, perhaps using technology that isn't too far off from what we have today. But I'm wanting to design the mockup first on my Mac and see how it looks, refine it, and maybe someday I'll post it on here, Behance or something like that. But I don't want to give away the idea just yet, except to say that the concept is actually fairly simple. I just need to brush up on my 3D modeling skills. I'd like to show a video of how it would open up, but otherwise I might just make a series of less realistic stills in Illustrator.
I disagree. Why is it more innovative to get the same battery life out of a smaller volume, than it is to get more battery life out of the same volume?
As I don't own an iPad as of yet (I'm waiting for the 2014 model to replace my iPod Touch 4g) I can't really comment on whether the iPad needs to be thinner or if more battery life is more important. I'm simply suggesting that any innovative work that allowed the iPad to be thinner could instead be tasked to innovating an improved battery life instead. Or dedicated to increasing the clock speed of the processor. Or adding more flash storage space. Or adding extra hardware features.
Does anyone remember how absurdly thick the iPad 3 was? It is why I still own an iPad2. The mini suffers from the same thickness problem. It actually feels bigger than the iPad 2 when you hold it. It is ridiculous.
The iPad really doesn't have a battery life issue, but thickness actually is a really big deal in a tablet. I am not sure if any of the people saying the mini doesn't need to slim down have actually ever used a tablet for an extended period of time.
Really bizarre thread where people want Apple to fix a problem that doesn't exist at the expense of fixing a problem that actually does exist.
The iPad really doesn't have a battery life issue, but thickness actually is a really big deal in a tablet. I am not sure if any of the people saying the mini doesn't need to slim down have actually ever used a tablet for an extended period of time.
Really bizarre thread where people want Apple to fix a problem that doesn't exist at the expense of fixing a problem that actually does exist.
There's room for improvement in weight and thickness on the iPad since battery life is quite good, while I think they should add battery life and sacrifice thickness on the iPhone.
I think one of the problems manufacturing a thin and small display is the colour garmut issue, so hopefully it can be fixed in the next version
iPad Mini Air?
It's one or the other, folks. Don't try and pull this. You're literally combining two products into one, name-wise. And that's something Apple wouldn't do.
It's one or the other, folks. Don't try and pull this. You're literally combining two products into one, name-wise. And that's something Apple wouldn't do.
I think one of the problems manufacturing a thin and small display is the colour garmut issue, so hopefully it can be fixed in the next version
Makes sense. I'm certainly hopeful of that. Was sort of disappointed with the current retina mini's screen and was greatful that this current generation was my generation to upgrade my full-sized iPad and not yet the one where I update my mini (which will be this next one; because A5 to A8 will surely be a huge one; plus holy hell is the first generation iPad mini ever slow with iOS 7).
Yeah, I'm only going to update if there is Touch ID on it. I don't really care about colour since its fine for what I do.