I don't disagree with that, although I see branding as more important than convenience. Facebook changed to Meta, Apple Computers to simply Apple. As the post from Arn shows, this site has already 'got' an Apple prefix, and as many companies have done, you simply redirect from one to the other, not losing the identity of one immediately, whilst creating the identity of the other.
Just because you can change the corporate identity doesn't mean you should. Facebook changed to meta, imo, to elevate and isolate themselves from the sleazy organization they really are and to bring an air about their place in the digital world (🤬). Apple Computers is in fact more accurate a corporate name today than Apple.
True it's not my site or business, but as long time poster, I believe I can still ask the question. In the forum you frequent a lot, there are many posts where an option is given, not offered, but which the community accepts.
no. this is like asking your friends to rename their child because you don’t like the name they chose.
Missed your coffee this morning? The OP simply posed a question...
As others have said, asking the question is acceptable, and Arn has been a gentleman about it. It's clear already that the community feels it's appropriate to keep the name, and so does the 'owners', which is more relevant. The analogy you suggested doesn't cut it, many organisations talk with it's community on it's strategic direction etc. Someone commentated that you might not yet have had your coffee, I hope it's that, not the past rearing it's ugly head.
