Did he want to bite the hand that fed him? News and information are businesses now. Truth didn't take a back seat, it got left at the station long ago by these news corporations.
The internet community as a whole is to the left, so to them, a typical run-of-the-mill liberal iappears as a centrist. Yea, that's exactly what that means. Look I respect Jon a lot even though I disagree with him politically, but to say he is a centrist is silly.You are the first person to disagree with the assessment so far. You do realise what it means right?
Before YouTube, _all_ movie trailers were on Apple's QuickTime site.QuickTime isn’t a delivery platform - it’s a bunch of file formats (quite successful as it became a foundation for widely used MP4 format) + various software to work with them. It’s not a streaming service like Apple Music or Netflix.
So do I, calling out people on your own side of the aisle doesn't make you a centrist. Just means you have a brain. I do the same things as well, but I'm clearly on the right just like Jon is clearly on the left of the political scale...he is in no way a centrist. Same for someone like Bill Maher, even though he is reasonable, sane, be critical of both sides, he is still on the left.Jon called out Obama covering up the Flint water, just like he called out Bush for Iraq WMDs. He leans left in the sense he’s a “progressive” in many ways, but he is far from partisan. He consistently calls out abuses of power on both sides, and is a voice of the everyday people.
China has been very successful in forcing us to reveal just how morally bankrupt we really are in the "free" world. We talk a good game about rights and all that stuff...but in the end the only thing that matters is $$$. Empowering China the way the western corporations have for the past several decades, completely compromising our values in exchange for cheap crap, will go down as one of the greatest blunders in human history.I wish everyone wasn't so distracted by this happening to Jon Stewart. The story here is that China's influence and the frequency at which they are pulling strings like this on US/western companies should be concerning. It's probably the story that Jon was working on that got their attention. China's "problems" with Taiwan, human rights and their foray into genocide with the Uyghur will one day come to a head. If anyone thinks all these little incidents are not attempts to wrap their tentacles around western media and interests as tightly as possible before one of those problems explodes, you need to think again. They've figured out the power to keep America off their back is to get our executive's answer to any government/military response to be "Yeah, but our profits though..."
The internet community as a whole is to the left, so to them, a typical run-of-the-mill liberal iappears as a centrist. Yea, that's exactly what that means. Look I respect Jon a lot even though I disagree with him politically, but to say he is a centrist is silly.
Depends on what you mean by centrist. If you mean some mythical midpoint between Republican and Democrat in the US, then you are probably right. But that ignores that the mainstream Democratic Party would be considered centrist compared across first-world democracies.So do I, calling out people on your own side of the aisle doesn't make you a centrist. Just means you have a brain. I do the same things as well, but I'm clearly on the right just like Jon is clearly on the left of the political scale...he is in no way a centrist. Same for someone like Bill Maher, even though he is reasonable, sane, be critical of both sides, he is still on the left.
Why not cancel the morning show. That one is full of victimization mentality and is preachy as H*ll. But I guess it’s okay if you agree with those politics. I love shows about the tv/film industry, but d*mn is this show one-sided. Even the West Wing - a show about politics - is more even-keeled and fair and respectful to different opinions.Jon is perhaps the best overall interviewer on any topic today. And you flushed his show?!
Terrible move Apple!
If Apple can’t stand up to a Jon Stewart exposé then it is possibly on the wrong side of the topic.
'Cause he looks like Winnie the Pooh?Winnie the Pooh is censored in China because people said he looks like Xi, so yeah, the CCP would care about Jon Stewart doing an episode on China.
"Centrist sensibilities"
LOL. I needed that. Been rough day at work.
'Cause he looks like Winnie the Pooh?
John is now going to roast apple like a pig along with china. On his own show on a bigger platform with his own money. Apple can get ****ed.If true you have to wonder what topics Jon Stewart was going to cover.
Maybe someone else (YouTube? Netflix?) could pick up the show if it gets cancelled.
John is now going to roast apple like a pig along with china. On his own show on a bigger platform with his own money. Apple can get ****ed.
I use their products but everyone needs to know Apple is a marketing powerhouse who makes descent products. They are here to make money. They could care less about any of us.
Finally, you found one Apple product that sucks.There is of course, always the possibility that the show was cancelled due to poor ratings and this is nothing more than an attempt by disgruntled showrunners to vilify Apple. "My show didn't suck! It's because Apple didn't want to risk angering China!"
Finally, you found one Apple product that sucks.
Lol. Every show on Apple TV+ has poor ratings compared to every other streaming service. I seriously doubt that ratings was John Stewart's problem. We've seen how Apple kowtows to China again and again and again. This is likely yet another example of Apple's pathetic subservience to the CCP.There is of course, always the possibility that the show was cancelled due to poor ratings and this is nothing more than an attempt by disgruntled showrunners to vilify Apple. "My show didn't suck! It's because Apple didn't want to risk angering China!"