People don’t seem to be in a hurry to buy up stock. I guess it would’ve been a different story if this was the redesigned Series X/10 being sold and now banned. Speaking of next year’s redesigned Apple Watch, I hope this gets resolved soon so Apple will be able to include an oxygen sensor in that model. I’m interested in getting the AW Series X/10.
What does that mean ?? We don’t know if Series 10 will be redesigned and this is pointless. They are selling Series 9 and Ultra 2, as of today. And they are still selling them all over the world by the way (the ban is US only).
if the law is bad - change it
as for disabling SpO2 - you really think Apple would get away with that without lawsuits from customers?
Exactly . People bought a watch with SpO2 and they are expecting it to works properly.
Oh well. The SE is way more than good enough.
Says who ?
Do more research ON FACTS.
Apple actually actively poached researchers FROM from Massimo since 2013. Go ahead and LOOK UP.
Then Apple decided to release products that had technologies with patent on!
Please be an INFORMED fanboy!
Companies doesn’t “own” employees, so Apple and everyone else is allowed to offer for a better contract.
The patent violation has nothing to do with hired researchers.
If I want to expand my market, I’m not going to hire new guys freshly graduated from universities, but I will look for experienced people already working in the field.
Please be an INFORMED hater !
"Finally, Masimo will not suffer any cognizable harm, as it does not sell a competing product in the United States in any meaningful quantities (if at all)," continues Apple's filing. "Tellingly, the Commission's decision acknowledged that Masimo would not suffer any significant monetary harm from a stay."
This is why the ITC decision (and the lack of action by the current administration) is puzzling. Consumers aren’t deciding between Apple and Masimo for a smartwatch purchase — most probably haven’t even heard of Masimo. They work in different markets, so a stay is the very least that should happen. The harm is against Apple and consumers, not Masimo.
Very weak point on their part. Even if they are not competing in the same sector, Masimo is not a patent troll so a negotiation should have been made for their IP. A very bad call by Apple’s lawyers …