How about if I drop a hot McNugget in myself?! Oh wait, that’s already been done.Good point. And how about if I cut myself? I smell lawsuit.
How about if I drop a hot McNugget in myself?! Oh wait, that’s already been done.Good point. And how about if I cut myself? I smell lawsuit.
Wasn't it coffee? I've never gotten a McNugget hot enough to cause any damage.How about if I drop a hot McNugget in myself?! Oh wait, that’s already been done.
There was both a hot coffee lawsuit and one recently for a chicken nuggetWasn't it coffee? I've never gotten a McNugget hot enough to cause any damage.
Funny how you fail to blame the people who are misusing this product for their criminal activities...That’s because it works so well thanks to the large network of Apple phones and the low cost to purchase.
Let’s not kid ourselves this is an Apple problem.
Maybe you don’t care for the victims but I do.
Who do I sue if I get burned by the hot buttered popcorn though?As with all of these class action lawsuits, grab the popcorn and come back in a few years. Easy to sue and harder to win.
Depends. Is the butter too hot or is the popcorn kernel too hot?Who do I sue if I get burned by the hot buttered popcorn though?
You must realize that when law enforcement asks for the info, they have a warrant, and Apple would have to either fight it in court or comply.Interesting how Apple is so resistant to aiding law enforcement, except when the viability of an entire product is on the line.
Hmmm. Sue the farmer that owns the cows. There’s always a way to sue anybody for anything.Who do I sue if I get burned by the hot buttered popcorn though?
This is not an Apple problem, in fact, I don't see them losing this because out of all products on the market you can track people with, Apple actually has built-in protection to help prevent stalking.That’s because it works so well thanks to the large network of Apple phones and the low cost to purchase.
Let’s not kid ourselves this is an Apple problem.
Maybe you don’t care for the victims but I do.
if the technology was good enough it would mitigate this issue by design
Unfortunately, I think there’s a lot of truth in this.
So where are the class actions against Tile, Garmin, and all the other ‘tracker’ manufacturers? Is this proof that AirTags are vastly superior to any competition
That is literally how Tile and other such trackers operate.The issue is the auto-sharing that the Airtag does. I don't believe Tile automatically connects to other devices so you can track something without being near it.
I'm not saying I agree with a lawsuit, but we've seen Apple scramble to make updates to increase security with this since it was released.
You must realize that when law enforcement asks for the info, they have a warrant, and Apple would have to either fight it in court or comply.
I guarantee I can slip an AirTag in your vehicle that you can hear every day you drive and you will not be able to find it to remove it.Although she cannot locate the AirTags, she receives daily alerts from Apple and chimes from the AirTags that confirm that the AirTags are still there.
Umm what? She can hear them and receive alerts but cannot locate them???
Yes but Apple and other phone makers have also implemented features to prevent texting while driving. If they can be proactive and help users, they are obligated to do so providing it does not degrade product usability nor profits.I am entering this in the DAS category. What is next, someone texting while they are driving, get in a wreck and blame it on the cell phone company? What ever happened to personal responsibility?
GPS trackers require subscriptions to report all the time. This connects the device to its user/abuser. We work with law enforcement (we have developed a personal AirTag detector) who tell us that drug and illegal arms dealers now prefer AirTags over GPS trackers because the data is encrypted and protected by Apple and AirTags last 1 year compared to a few days/weeks for GPS trackers. Without a legal warrant, Apple will not reveal the illegal user to authorities.GPS trackers are cheaper and report location all the time.
The case isn't brought by the State of California, but by people who live in CA. There are crazies in every state.So we’re going to punish companies rather than the disgusting criminals? Sounds aboutrightCalifornia.
Punish the company, or just stop them selling a product in its current form. I mean, what's the alternative? Tell the stalking victims to suck it up because other people keep losing their stuff if they can't tag it?So we’re going to punish companies rather than the disgusting criminals? Sounds aboutrightCalifornia.
Car makers are liable all the time. That's why they have so many recalls and safety regulations. Apple has no control over their users but they have complete control over their software. They are actively looking into doing more to solve this problem because they know they can.Explain to me how Apple is liable for this, but car makers are not liable for making a giant death machine when someone gets run over?