Different builds, also not to mention with these tests without a force meter its hard to tell what actual stresses are being applied.maybe, i wonder why he couldn't break iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus back glass?
Different builds, also not to mention with these tests without a force meter its hard to tell what actual stresses are being applied.maybe, i wonder why he couldn't break iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus back glass?
He took the frame to a lab to see if it really is grade 5 titanium. Show ain’t over yet! 🤣So it’s you who replaces your phone more frequently than most then?! 😉
My OP was to share information. And I applaud the sharing of any further information from reasonably good sources (of which JerryRigs is one IMHO) whether they repeat his findings or not. Time will tell whether or not there is a concern to be had. If it turns out that the 15 PM is just as robust as previous models then that’s good news.
Oh wow, I have MagBak for 13PM and it’s a thick tough case. I mostly had my massive drops in PhoneRenel Gen3 and some with Caudabe Sheath though, and the phone is mint. I’m currently using Apple Silicone on my 15PM and it feels thinner and flimsier in comparison to all 3. Not sure which second case to get.MagBack case, dropped on my kitchen floor.
I usually use DBrand but post heart surgery I've become a gym rat and focused on my overall health, so I got the MagBak to stick to squat racks for eye level viewing of my workout app and form videos.Oh wow, I have MagBak for 13PM and it’s a thick tough case. I mostly had my massive drops in PhoneRenel Gen3 and some with Caudabe Sheath though, and the phone is mint. I’m currently using Apple Silicone on my 15PM and it feels thinner and flimsier in comparison to all 3. Not sure which second case to get.
Consumer reports just put it through a test and it survived. So, Jerry rig, don't trust his Bs test.
A bit disappointed. I’ve no doubts the PM will give quicker than the smaller phones. Do I regret my purchase of a 15PM? No. It will be a freak accident if my ever suffers a situation that will exert that much force in the necessary pressure points. I never carry a phone in my back pocket and if I’m doing an oil change or other activity where I’m laying, I remove my phone from my front pocket.
Nothing generates YouTube clicks faster than “the latest Samsung or Apple device is awesome or awful”…. I’m guilty of watching myself. Less guilty of being influenced.
Uh no, consumer reports is a hell of a lot more thorough and scientific than JRE.Always best to support the test that has the outcome one prefers.
It’s linked earlier in this thread.Where’s JREs video doing the same to the 15 Plus?
I guess all these worshippers of JRE ignores the statement he himself makes: “just because one breaks doesn’t mean they all would”It’s linked earlier in this thread.
I guess all these worshippers of JRE ignores the statement he himself makes: “just because one breaks doesn’t mean they all would”
Sure, but afaik the other durability testers have not experienced the same outcome in the “bend it by hand test”I don’t think we have any worshippers here; just people who think it is worthy of note that the iPhone 15 PM fails a test that none of the other 15 models failed and no iPhone has failed for many years. And you are right; a single test does not tell the whole story, we need to see if anyone else is able to replicate it before jumping to definite conclusions.
I would take you seriously if you didn't move your position around. Your premise from the beginning was that somehow 1 unscientific test indicates a design flaw. Meanwhile as posted above, consumer reports did do tests on it and it passed with flying colors.I don’t think we have any worshippers here; just some people who think it is worthy of note that the iPhone 15 PM fails a test that none of the other 15 models failed and no iPhone has failed for many years. And you are right; a single test does not tell the whole story, we need to see if anyone else is able to replicate it before jumping to definite conclusions.
See the consumer reports test posted earlier...Sure, but afaik the other durability testers have not experienced the same outcome in the “bend it by hand test”
Not to mention, a test that bends a sample size of 1 using the very precise and accurate instrument that is the human hand doesn’t isn’t exactly what one would consider scientific.
Not sure why there aren’t YouTubers that do these sorts of tests using precise, reproducible methods that produce quantifiable measurements etc.
“I bent it with 7 units of hand firmness this year and it broke. Last year I promise I applied the exact same 7 units of hand firmness…”
I guess all these worshippers of JRE ignores the statement he himself makes: “just because one breaks doesn’t mean they all would”
The home is there on previous models. The wireless coil blocks it from being seen. Especially since the old back glass is heavily glued. Not the case anymore. Apple should just offer warranty back glass with an updated metal plate attached to the glass like the 15 and 15plus have.In the follow-up teardown video there was no mention as to why the glass may have broken. But as others have pointed out the aluminium mid frame is completely new design and has a big hole in it. Maybe that was all the flex needed to break the glass. Previous designs featured no such frame or hole as far as I know.
View attachment 2279362
View attachment 2279366
A lot of users put their phones in their back pocket which is why the bend test exists. I doubt this hole would cause many issues though.
I suspect you are reading more into my original post than I intended.I would take you seriously if you didn't move your position around. Your premise from the beginning was that somehow 1 unscientific test indicates a design flaw. Meanwhile as posted above, consumer reports did do tests on it and it passed with flying colors.
I guess all these worshippers of JRE ignores the statement he himself makes: “just because one breaks doesn’t mean they all would”
I’m interested in discussing this. It is the most to visible change. If I were in the design team, I’d have the wireless and MagSafe ring underneath a metal plate on the back glass. Then adhered rubber dampening on that metal plate that is sandwiched against the metal midframe. The base 14’s and 15’s have a metal plate adhered to their back glass. Only difference is there is no midframe directly under their back glass, it’s instead under the screen.I’m not convinced with this…
The 14 Pro has a metal back, but glued to the glass. Is that what makes the difference? Structurally it’s almost the same. They just moved where/how it’s sandwiched.
And isn’t the new Pro design basically how the 14/15 is constructed? They did this change starting last year. How are those ones supposedly more durable?
I've only been an iPhone user for 3 years. I joined this place because I thought it'd be a bit more sensible than reddit. I now believe I was wrong.‘Worshippers’? You’ll inadvertently discredit your own opinion trying to do it to others with that sort of statement. We are all iPhone users here and have been for years, hence why we are on this forum to begin with. Nobody worships a YouTuber, we just found his video alarming. Maybe all iPhones don’t crack under medium thumb and finger pressure and that was a bad one, but it has been stated the back glass is thinner than the 14 series which is worth discussing.