Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sixteengigabytes

macrumors newbie
May 31, 2021
15
88
There is an option to upgrade to 16 or even more if you need more RAM. I donā€™t understand the problem. What am I missing here?
The problem is that in 2024 it should be standard. In fact, the window for 16gb being standard started to close years ago. Itā€™s nothing less than a money grab to force people to pay $300 for an extra 8GB of ram if they want their machine to have longevity. We all know it should be standard at this point, this thread exists for a reason. The sheer audacity of the bean counters is an insult to customers and is a cvnty move by Apple.
 

Yebubbleman

macrumors 603
May 20, 2010
5,832
2,421
Los Angeles, CA
The simple fact is that yes, many, many people use 8Gb AS Macs and never notice any subpar consequence of the RAM.

I don't question those who WOULD notice, because their use cases clearly give them reason to, but I also don't question those who don't, because there's no basis to genuinely know.

This argument is old and tired and negates the simple fact that my use cases, which again, are running ~10 browser tabs in Safari, and between 1-3 other stock applications, will frequently entail a spinning beach ball, yellow or red memory pressure, and alerts telling me that I've run out of system memory. I am not putting my base model M1 MacBook Airs and base model M1 iMac (all of which have 7 GPU Cores, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB SSDs) through any kind of medium, let alone heavy workload. My use case IS the use case everyone talks about wherein "8GB should be fine" and it's not. Period.

Literally every response to this, including yours, seems to conveniently sidestep this and is always predicated on the asinine notion that if no one is there to hear the tree fall in the middle of the forest, then no tree technically fell.


In my own case, I CAN know, and other than that I get occasional audio dropouts while AirPlaying video to an Apple TV in the background while the system is busy with a number of other tasks, I see zero consequence. Even that can be duplicated on a 16Gb system too.

Fill up your pool of RAM and you experience the symptoms of not having enough RAM for what you want to do. Nothing novel here.

In the wider sense, lacking any knowledge of Apple's future plans, and observing only what common uses people put their computers to, I suspect Apple have a far better idea of what they're doing than the vast majority of people who post in macrumors threads. I don't necessarily LIKE what they do, and I don't necessarily AGREE with what they do, but there's no one better placed to understand their objectives and decisions than they are.

Apple is a corporation. Apple's sole objective is to make Apple money. There is no "only Apple knows what's best for Apple" about it. Apple is going for what makes them money. And selling Macs in 2024 above $998 with 8GB is proven to make them money. That doesn't mean it's a good decision for their customers. That just means that they know that they'll be able to get away with it and make enough money in the process. We need to stop acting like they know what's best for consumers. Also like they, like literally every other computer manufacturer in existence, won't sell machines that have a poor bang to buck ratio and/or are not good long term buys. Such practices are not beneath Apple.

Speaking just for me, I don't have the resources to replace my 8Gb M1 systems, so personally, it's a moot point. Assuming I keep on using these computers for the work I need them to do, they will keep on working exactly as they do now - which is exactly what I want and need. It hardly matters if the entire computing world outside bloats to a 128Gb minima, these machines don't need to change.

And if you never upgrade the operating system, let alone any installed software, that's one thing.

The thing everyone conveniently forgets is that system requirements change over time. 8GB of RAM was a really decent amount 10 years ago. Was even an okay amount to have 5 years ago. That's not true today and it really won't be true in a few years. People buying Macs expect them to last a decade, whether there's any actual truth to that or not.

In the wider context, 'down the road' most other users will do what most other users have always done since the Commodore PETs, Apple IIs and TRS-80s... they'll replace their existing systems with the next big thing. Their existing systems are more recyclable than ever, there are trade-in options via Apple or some retailers (Best Buy in the US for example) or sell-on options via the likes of eBay, so there's better options now than every before. The market will just roll along, complete with consumers, as it has always done.

For someone who admitted to not having the resources to replace 8GB M1 machines, you do seem to neglect the fact that most people can't afford to buy a new Mac every five years. This is MacRumors; you have people on here who are either wealthy and/or prioritize spending money on new Apple things sooner than the average person can afford to in this economy. It's a no-brainer to spend $200 extra now so that you can go 3-5 additional years without having to spend another $1000-1600 on yet another low-end model. The idea of "well, when it becomes insufficient, they'll just replace it as they always have" implies that everyone has the resources to do so and that the need to do so isn't a four-figure inconvenience. I won't be needing to replace my 16GB M1 13-inch MacBook Pro anytime soon; but even I'll probably have to start saving my pennies for the inevitable replacement in the not-too distant future. Can't just do that whenever I feel like it. Most people can't either. For that reason alone, it's smarter to just not buy 8GB of RAM in a machine where upgrading that RAM means replacing the entire computer.
 
Or just buy a PC and do everything on it your Mac can do. Cheaper. Thatā€™s the route Iā€™ve gone. My wifeā€™s near $5,000 studio Mac has had its storage replaced twice. And now itā€™s back at Apple for a motherboard replacement. Sheā€™s a software engineer and has had to resort to using a gaming PC I built last year.
Sheā€™s selling the Mac Studio and having me build her a computer with the money.

22 years of an old Apple family. Done. And gone forever.
bye bye.
hope you have fun over on the dark side ;)
 

UPBaylor

macrumors member
Sep 30, 2014
69
16
The problem is that in 2024 it should be standard. In fact, the window for 16gb being standard started to close years ago. Itā€™s nothing less than a money grab to force people to pay $300 for an extra 8GB of ram if they want their machine to have longevity. We all know it should be standard at this point, this thread exists for a reason. The sheer audacity of the bean counters is an insult to customers and is a cvnty move by Apple.
Rather than rail on Apple, I think we should all simply realize that computer purchases from them currently requires a +$400 price from the base models, then use that for considering the value of a purchase. Those entry prices are teasers and should be thought of as such. Those models will do the job if you don't mind a few work arounds and can put up with some bumps here and there. Many people probably can, but we should adjust our thinking to assume you will need to spend a decent amount more to get the "real" product.

Like others have stated, financially Apple is just a company trying to make money. We consumers are the suckers when we assume the base priced product is the full service one. Just add the $400 when you are doing an evaluation and decide from there if you find enough value to make the purchase.
 

turbineseaplane

macrumors Pentium
Mar 19, 2008
15,004
32,177
Or just buy a PC and do everything on it your Mac can do. Cheaper. Thatā€™s the route Iā€™ve gone. My wifeā€™s near $5,000 studio Mac has had its storage replaced twice. And now itā€™s back at Apple for a motherboard replacement. Sheā€™s a software engineer and has had to resort to using a gaming PC I built last year.
Sheā€™s selling the Mac Studio and having me build her a computer with the money.

22 years of an old Apple family. Done. And gone forever.

I made a similar move in the last few weeks
I'd been running a Hack desktop and repurposed the parts for a Windows 11 machine and got an RTX card

(still have my 2015 15" MBP -- because ... I love it!!)

Working great - loving the GPU - loving the flexibility and ability to add storage at will, including a backup drive in there.

Apple has lost the plot
 
  • Like
Reactions: spcopsmac21

tonykariotis

macrumors newbie
Mar 8, 2024
2
0
The 2024 MacBook Air was just announced but Apple still offer

8GB Unified Memory​

256GB SSD Storage​

This is crazy just crazy Apple you just crazy​

Because most people do not need more than 8GB. System on a chip is not like CPU's in the past.

Life long Mac user since the 90s, currently on an M1 MBP. I have never ever said 'I need more ram'. Running Final Cut Pro, premiere, entire adobe creative suite, and an external apple display. (Not saying no one needs 16 or more, but for those that do, just upgrade before you buy, but if you do need 16GB+ you won't be shopping for a MacBook Air in the first place.

Paying for extra storage is a different story, but I'd argue take base 256 and sign up for cloud storage services, unless you want to lose everything if your laptop goes missing, because most peoples backup strategies don't exist in the first place. Upgrading to 512 might be smart though if you will load tons of apps and want to edit video locally without an external drive, but then again, it's a MacBook Air. Not a Pro.

Plus if you understand the systems on a chip Apple makes, you would know M3 chip is 8GB. There are no stock variations. The chip debuted last Halloween. M3 Pro/Max and soon Ultra offer more at base level, but these will never be offered on an Air.

I signed up to reply to this, have been a daily reader without an account since MR first came out... This is my first post, only took 20+ years... :)
 

Mainsail

macrumors 68020
Sep 19, 2010
2,354
3,153
I made a similar move in the last few weeks
I'd been running a Hack desktop and repurposed the parts for a Windows 11 machine and got an RTX card

(still have my 2015 15" MBP -- because ... I love it!!)

Working great - loving the GPU - loving the flexibility and ability to add storage at will, including a backup drive in there.

Apple has lost the plot
Not sure how you can draw the conclusion that "Apple has lost the plot" wrt the MBA, when your entire post is the antithesis of a the typical MBA consumer.

BTW - Apple claims the MBA is the world's best selling laptop, so if they "lost the plot", it seems to be working out ok.
 
Last edited:

spcopsmac21

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2009
888
933
I wish they did, then i could upgrade the RAM and storage myself. šŸ˜‚
I agree with you there. These completely integrated machines will start failing at the 6 year mark. Then they will become nearly worthless because all of the vital parts are serialized and locked to the mother board. So swapping parts from old machines makes it out of the question.

Youā€™ll have a $3500 paper weight. And expected to get a new one as soon as AppleCare wares out.

Apple has changed. And not for the better.
 
Last edited:

spcopsmac21

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2009
888
933
bye bye.
hope you have fun over on the dark side ;)
: respirator sounds: now to convert my son. : respirator sounds :

Weā€™re still an iOS family. But owning a Mac for work and productivity just doesnā€™t pay for itself anymore like it use to. Apple has priced a six figure income family out of doing business with it. And I own shares in the company. Donā€™t worry guys, I wonā€™t be selling it for Microsoft stock.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane

spcopsmac21

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2009
888
933
I made a similar move in the last few weeks
I'd been running a Hack desktop and repurposed the parts for a Windows 11 machine and got an RTX card

(still have my 2015 15" MBP -- because ... I love it!!)

Working great - loving the GPU - loving the flexibility and ability to add storage at will, including a backup drive in there.

Apple has lost the plot
My home server is a Hackintosh. An old HP Z440 server. A 12 core intel Xeon processor 128gb of ddr4 ram and 12TB of storage. With an AMD 5600xt gpu. Granted itā€™s on the last flavor of macOS. It works FLAWLESSLY. The ā€œ about this macā€ thinks itā€™s an iMac Pro 5k. Iā€™ll let it dream a little.


My trash can Mac Pro finally bit the dust and trying to run a home server off 14ā€ MacBook Pro isā€¦. Itā€™s not going to happen. I was going to use the gaming PC I built for myself but thatā€™s the wifeā€™s until I build her replacement.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane

Sami13496

macrumors 6502
Jul 25, 2022
498
1,179
The problem is that in 2024 it should be standard. In fact, the window for 16gb being standard started to close years ago. Itā€™s nothing less than a money grab to force people to pay $300 for an extra 8GB of ram if they want their machine to have longevity. We all know it should be standard at this point, this thread exists for a reason. The sheer audacity of the bean counters is an insult to customers and is a cvnty move by Apple.
I still donā€™t get it. If there is still demand, Apple doing good business, why would they lower prices just because of people who canā€™t afford it whining about it? Like seriously, no business makes decision to lower prices just to be nice. Like take Mercedes Benz. Some people are complaining that they canā€™t afford MB and have to buy Kia or whatever. Should MB make their cars more affordable? No. Their business model is premium segment. They target customers who have money and are willing to pay the premium price for the premium product. Just like Apple. Frankly I think itā€™s pathetic to whine about Apple prices. Canā€™t afford it? Then a) make more money or b) save up longer or c) just get that cheap windows laptop with 16 GB base config because thatā€™s in your budget.
 

spcopsmac21

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2009
888
933
I still donā€™t get it. If there is still demand, Apple doing good business, why would they lower prices just because of people who canā€™t afford it whining about it? Like seriously, no business makes decision to lower prices just to be nice. Like take Mercedes Benz. Some people are complaining that they canā€™t afford MB and have to buy Kia or whatever. Should MB make their cars more affordable? No. Their business model is premium segment. They target customers who have money and are willing to pay the premium price for the premium product. Just like Apple. Frankly I think itā€™s pathetic to whine about Apple prices. Canā€™t afford it? Then a) make more money or b) save up longer or c) just get that cheap windows laptop with 16 GB base config because thatā€™s in your budget.
Apple as of the last two years has seen a SHARP decline in computer sales. And weā€™re getting discounts almost instantly on base model machines. And even deeper discounts on machines with a year on their availability.

Apple usually would NEVER do that.
Discounts on an Apple product? And itā€™s not Black Friday, back to school or Presidentsā€™ Day?

With an ever shrinking middle class the $1200 ā€œ entry level ā€œ laptop will make less and less sense as time progresses.
 

Jim Lahey

macrumors 68030
Apr 8, 2014
2,626
5,379
Or just buy a PC and do everything on it your Mac can do. Cheaper. Thatā€™s the route Iā€™ve gone. My wifeā€™s near $5,000 studio Mac has had its storage replaced twice. And now itā€™s back at Apple for a motherboard replacement. Sheā€™s a software engineer and has had to resort to using a gaming PC I built last year.
Sheā€™s selling the Mac Studio and having me build her a computer with the money.

22 years of an old Apple family. Done. And gone forever.

Lots of faithful Apple fans feeling this way and acting. More than two that I personally know. The reality distortion field has collapsed. Ever-distending, buggy bloatware. Ugly designs. Aggravating, anti-consumer, extortionate, untenable checkout decisions and increasingly questionable component quality is not a good look for a company purporting to be the exemplar of tech utopia. Bad JuJu for Apple. They crested the wave a long, long time ago.
 

geta

macrumors 68000
May 18, 2010
1,517
1,243
The Moon
Or just buy a PC and do everything on it your Mac can do. Cheaper. Thatā€™s the route Iā€™ve gone. My wifeā€™s near $5,000 studio Mac has had its storage replaced twice. And now itā€™s back at Apple for a motherboard replacement. Sheā€™s a software engineer and has had to resort to using a gaming PC I built last year.
Sheā€™s selling the Mac Studio and having me build her a computer with the money.

22 years of an old Apple family. Done. And gone forever.

My home server is a Hackintosh. An old HP Z440 server. A 12 core intel Xeon processor 128gb of ddr4 ram and 12TB of storage. With an AMD 5600xt gpu. Granted itā€™s on the last flavor of macOS. It works FLAWLESSLY. The ā€œ about this macā€ thinks itā€™s an iMac Pro 5k. Iā€™ll let it dream a little.


My trash can Mac Pro finally bit the dust and trying to run a home server off 14ā€ MacBook Pro isā€¦. Itā€™s not going to happen. I was going to use the gaming PC I built for myself but thatā€™s the wifeā€™s until I build her replacement.

Itā€™s a bit ironic that you ā€œstop buying Macsā€ but instead you building yourself Hackintoshā€¦ ;)
 

raythompsontn

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2023
592
792
Apple has changed. And not for the better.
Except for being one of the highest valued companies on the planet. That is indeed better for the stockholders. Just because you don't like where they are heading then maybe the problem is your perspective and not Apple's.

I don't like car prices, home prices, utility prices, gas prices. Apple is far down on my list as I don't buy a computer every year. The cost of an Apple computer amortized over five years is pennies a day. People spend more on Starbucks overpriced junk in a year than would be spent on a Apple computer. Yet no one complains about Starbuck prices.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mainsail

macrumors 68020
Sep 19, 2010
2,354
3,153
My home server is a Hackintosh. An old HP Z440 server. A 12 core intel Xeon processor 128gb of ddr4 ram and 12TB of storage. With an AMD 5600xt gpu. Granted itā€™s on the last flavor of macOS. It works FLAWLESSLY. The ā€œ about this macā€ thinks itā€™s an iMac Pro 5k. Iā€™ll let it dream a little.


My trash can Mac Pro finally bit the dust and trying to run a home server off 14ā€ MacBook Pro isā€¦. Itā€™s not going to happen. I was going to use the gaming PC I built for myself but thatā€™s the wifeā€™s until I build her replacement.
In the Venn diagram of consumer profiles and priorities, what is the intersection between people that build Hackintosh servers and folks that buy base configuration MBAs? How many MBA consumers even know what a Hackintosh is or would consider for a second building one?

It seems to me that the biggest critics of the new M3 MBA aren't even close to the target market for the computer. To use a well worn car analogy: It really does not make sense for me to criticize a family sedan because it does not meet my needs for a pickup truck. If I am going to evaluate the sedan, I need to overlay the requirements of a typical family sedan buyer.....not my needs as a pickup truck buyer.

This is the reason these threads get so off the rails.....a disconnect between the critics of the product and the actual users of the product. When you talk to people that actually use the MBA, which I do because there are lots of them (8 at last count) in the extended family (mainly college students and office working professionals), they (me included) love these computers. I mean, according to Apple it is the world's most popular laptop. Is it even remotely possible that the critics are the ones out of touch and not the actual users?
 
Last edited:

chucker23n1

macrumors G3
Dec 7, 2014
8,599
11,382
Apple as of the last two years has seen a SHARP decline in computer sales.

This is true, but is misleading, as

1) the entire industry has, and
2) it follows a stark rise in sales

2021 and 2022 were an outlier. If you leave those out, Mac sales are better than they've ever been.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee

spcopsmac21

macrumors 6502a
Nov 9, 2009
888
933
This is true, but is misleading, as

1) the entire industry has, and
2) it follows a stark rise in sales

2021 and 2022 were an outlier. If you leave those out, Mac sales are better than they've ever been.
As a long time Apple shareholder I would politely say youā€™re wrong. Go see our last earning report.
 

kp98077

macrumors 601
Oct 26, 2010
4,158
2,662
When the Pro machines 14" are on sale (now) at best buy I dont understand why people dont just buy these over a beefed up air?? Doesnt make sense to be to get 1" of screen?
 

ctjack

macrumors 65816
Mar 8, 2020
1,371
1,412
When the Pro machines 14" are on sale (now) at best buy I dont understand why people dont just buy these over a beefed up air?? Doesnt make sense to be to get 1" of screen?
14 inch Pros are quarter pound heavier than 15 Air and much much heavier than 13 Air.
So if you need true power then 14 makes sense, but if you need a bit of stealthiness in your life and ability to move this thing, then Air is for the win given if you can get by its' performance. Like if you are not pushing all power on 14, then Air will do the job while being more portable.
 

geta

macrumors 68000
May 18, 2010
1,517
1,243
The Moon
When the Pro machines 14" are on sale (now) at best buy I dont understand why people dont just buy these over a beefed up air?? Doesnt make sense to be to get 1" of screen?

Again we running in circlesā€¦ not everyone want or need MBP, many just want the most portable/lightest laptop they can have, while having great performance.

Im more then happy to pay extra for 13ā€ MBA with 24GB RAM and 1TB storage then having similar 14ā€ MBP.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.