You are missing that people don't usually know what the future holds, and can no longer adapt after purchase.There is an option to upgrade to 16 or even more if you need more RAM. I don’t understand the problem. What am I missing here?
This. It’s your perfect average person config. From grandma to PowerPoint warrior.8GB Memory is still good enough for students and grandma to use it to browse the web and use Microsoft Word. That's probably not going to change any time soon.
And they are welcome to buy the spec they want / need. If it helps, you can imagine the 16 gb ram / 512gb storage option as the "true" MBA and ignore the existence of all the other variations before it.Rubbish, everyone needs more than 8/256. Everyone.
Not everyone finances their computers. I don't.At this point, this whole issue is a nothingburger aside from a few people complaining about how they aren't wiling to pay a few extra hundred dollars for more ram and storage which barely works out to what? A few dollars per month for the next 5 years they intend to hold on to it?
Not everyone finances their computers. I don't.
Not everyone finances their computers. I don't.
It’s all about trade-off. Better screen/speakers/OS/build quality. Most of these features are subjective. That’s why you need to make your own purchasing decisions.For sure. Or, at least in this price bracket. I could stomach my previous laptop's 8GB of RAM because it was $750 (~$500 open box, how I got it). These M3 Airs start at $1,200!!
And what most people missed, due to bad communication, was that at the same wattage, the M chips did outperform Nvidia's comparable cards. They weren't just saying that the M beat the RTX flat out, it was at a ridiculous low wattage that the M was trouncing the RTX.Reminds me of when they were comparing M GPUs to top end NVIDIA RTX cards
I laughed then, like I laugh now - lol
8gb more ram.they aren't wiling to pay a few extra hundred dollars formore ram
Well to me, anything less than 128GB is a no go now. So that leaves very few choices. I’m not going around claiming this is NOT PRO because it only has 64GB. Or 96 etc.Aw, that was a great thread. That thread finally got me off my keister to join the forum. Lot of very stern opinions. 😄
But it makes me wonder if for a lot of those Mac Users that are still upset about 8gb, are they truly hitting the 8gb Ram limitations? If they are, wouldn't they have known, "Ok, I'm not an average user I need to pretend 8gb doesn't exist because it will always have to be 16gb for me." It seems like by now they would know that.
It almost feels like a prestige thing. "How are those PC users going to look at us?!?"
I mean, I can code in Xcode, make Apps and upload them to the Appstore. I can even do medium level 3D modeling in Blender. 🤷♂️ Seems like if someone is buying a laptop and not even checking wether its 8gb or 16gb, they're not going to need 16gb.
And there is also the fact that the cost of these upgrades is ridiculously high compared to what Windows users pay. A TB of external storage from Scandisk costs $85. It's $400 from Apple. Plugging external storage wrecks the ergonomics of a laptop, and risks being accidentally unplugged during a write.I don’t either.
Very true! People also need to keep in mind that activity monitor isn’t the deciding factor of more RAM.I know this is MR, but try to pretend the rest of humanity isn’t tech nerds constantly monitoring their Task Manager or Activity Monitor.
Lots of people THINK they will have no problem with 8/256, and will be very disappointed six months after purchase. Once they have a new mac, they will discover new use cases, and then discover that their new mac isn't up to the task.Complaining about a Mac model you weren't going to buy in the first place is certainly questionable behavior. Lots of people have no problem with 8/256.
What are some key MacBook Air consumer use cases that call for more than 8GB? Just curious, since mine only gets used as a travel/casual machine.Lots of people THINK they will have no problem with 8/256, and will be very disappointed six months after purchase. Once they have a new mac, they will discover new use cases, and then discover that their new mac isn't up to the task.
8gb more ram.
I corrected it. That may help to see where some of the problems lie.
The cost of an apple upgrade verses the cost of actual ram.
I don’t either. And I bought three fully maxed out Mac Studios and two maxed out MacBook pros.Not everyone finances their computers. I don't.
And there is also the fact that the cost of these upgrades is ridiculously high compared to what Windows users pay. A TB of external storage from Scandisk costs $85. It's $400 from Apple. Plugging external storage wrecks the ergonomics of a laptop, and risks being accidentally unplugged during a write.
Side note: Apple's prices for iCloud are designed to make things difficult. 50 GB is not quite enough to back up your 64 GB iPhone. The 200 GB plan is just small enough that you can't back up your laptop. And the 2 TB plan costs 9.99 a month. You could buy a new 2 TB plater drive every seven months for that! And if you ever NEEDED those backups? How long does it take to download 2 TB?
Really wish we could do device backups on other platforms. I love OneDrive’s photo backup tool, and it’s crazy cheap for 1 TB of storage for a year.And there is also the fact that the cost of these upgrades is ridiculously high compared to what Windows users pay. A TB of external storage from Scandisk costs $85. It's $400 from Apple. Plugging external storage wrecks the ergonomics of a laptop, and risks being accidentally unplugged during a write.
Side note: Apple's prices for iCloud are designed to make things difficult. 50 GB is not quite enough to back up your 64 GB iPhone. The 200 GB plan is just small enough that you can't back up your laptop. And the 2 TB plan costs 9.99 a month. You could buy a new 2 TB plater drive every seven months for that! And if you ever NEEDED those backups? How long does it take to download 2 TB?
I get it. I can afford things too. But I don’t like being fleeced. 200 quid for 8gb of ram is being fleeced to the highest degree.At a local restaurant, I pay $3 for a can of coke that probably cost them only 30 cents, and I am not allowed to bring in my own food and drink. It’s all part of the cost of eating out, and I am not going to try to scrimp and wave by say, making frequent trips to the toilet to gulp down water from the tap.
Either that or I just don’t eat out, if I am not willing to pay.
I know that the price of ram and storage upgrades is inflated (how could I not with a 85-page thread?) and honestly, it doesn’t really irritate me. Pay for what I need (the upgraded model is roughly 1/3 of my monthly salary?), and get on with using it for the things that really matter in my life.
And what most people missed, due to bad communication, was that at the same wattage, the M chips did outperform Nvidia's comparable cards. They weren't just saying that the M beat the RTX flat out, it was at a ridiculous low wattage that the M was trouncing the RTX.