Because they can, and at their volumes, it's extremely profitable.As low as memory costs are now, why would Apple cheap out like this?
Because they can, and at their volumes, it's extremely profitable.As low as memory costs are now, why would Apple cheap out like this?
Disagree. There's an option to upgrade if needed. Why should customers pay for more memory they don't need?
This is a separate discussion from the pricing of memory.
What Is Binning? A Basic Definition
What is the meaning of binning? CPU, GPU and RAM binning explained.www.tomshardware.com
educate yourself on how CPU are produced and you will understand how they are released in products. They just dont get delivered magically by some bird.
What are you on aboutActually, I've got a better idea. Apple could start with a default of 16 or 32GB. But like you said, since users don't need such high specs, we can offer a reduction. Yes, give back $200 or more off the base price. How does that sound? This way, the 8GB models will become more valuable in the market – scarcity drives up value, right?
Most of the complaints run along the lines of what a pro is. Professional. That’s not just people playing around in photoshop or dumping videos online no one Watches. It’s also educators, finance, bankers, business owners, managers, small businesses, and everything in between.The issue is calling it a “Pro” machine since that implies it will run software for developers and creatives. Comparing it to PCs shouldn’t be the criteria. There should at least be an asterisk that if you are a pro then the starting “pro” model stocked in stores is the “M3 Pro”.
Memory controllers are on SOC, and have everything to do with memory. This is why you see a binned 3 channel memory max vs a 4 channel max m3 ...The RAM is separate from the main die. This has nothing to do with binning. RAM is added during packaging for M-series chips.
Why would you feel ashamed? Do you tie your personality to a brand?So I suppose that 8GB on a Mac are not equal to 16GB on a PC.
Apple actually went and claimed that. I felt so ashamed as an Apple Silicon user.
Fully agreed. It's the pricing and naming that is up for debate. Having the option to start at 8 GB is a good thing.Most of the complaints run along the lines of what a pro is. Professional. That’s not just people playing around in photoshop or dumping videos online no one Watches. It’s also educators, finance, bankers, business owners, managers, small businesses, and everything in between.
It is a legit complaint that the upgrade to 16gb or more is so expensive. But a lot of these complaints, every year, are people crying about the delay in producing something for their three patreon subscribers.
But are they? The memory architecture in Apple Silicon is integrated - do they just use the exact same chips that you'd find in a stick of PC RAM, only soldered into the M3 (or whatever version) unit?Really? And what is so different about the LPDDR5 chips that Apple uses? I'm quite sure they're quite standard.
I believe it's the chip design that makes the difference. All parts of the chip can talk to the "RAM" directly. On a PC, only the CPU can talk to the RAM.But are they? The memory architecture in Apple Silicon is integrated - do they just use the exact same chips that you'd find in a stick of PC RAM, only soldered into the M3 (or whatever version) unit?
Even my Mac that only sees office use needs more than 8GB. And as I said above, nobody would complain about the 8GB base models if the upgrade prices were, say, just 2x the normal rate instead of 5x or whatever it is.Most of the complaints run along the lines of what a pro is. Professional. That’s not just people playing around in photoshop or dumping videos online no one Watches. It’s also educators, finance, bankers, business owners, managers, small businesses, and everything in between.
As reported by John Gruber and others, the old Touch Bar MacBook Pro was the best selling model because it was the cheapest pro model. Often bought by company purchasing departments under advisement that a MacBook Pro was needed. It is important to set the higher end Macs with reasonable minimum specs for higher end tasks.The only way to break Apple of this BS, is NOT to buy the M3 MacBooks. They will get the hint eventually. There is zero justification for 8GB of RAM in the current marketplace, especially in Pro model machines.
Why do people think their way of using a computer is the only way? its 2023, you would think that people wouldnt judge or make judgements about how people use their own computers, but here we areWould a Pro ever buy a 8GB computer in 2023? No, so luckily for Apple, the real world consequence is zero guys. Not protecting apple, just think twice about 'real world' tests in unreal setup choices.
There are other factors you're missing when "only" using an iPhone or an iPad to replace an 8GB MacBook.It is ludicrous to buy any new $500+ personal computer these days with only 8GB of RAM. The $200 extra cost isn't terrible for an an extra 8GB...I get that Apple wants to make a profit. But now you're spending $1800 for a laptop (Apple brand and also the "Pro" model) to get your 16GB of RAM that everyone else offers on far, far less expensive laptops.
Folks can claim there's more value about the OS or the weight or the sexiness factor compared to Wintel machines but the fact remains that 8GB of RAM is a complete joke for any newly manufactured computer in late 2023 that you want to use other than a web surfing and/or email machine. People don't buy laptops for just those 2 functions...they've been buying iPads and iPhones for almost a decade now for far less money instead.
Yes, the same chips. Just that they are on the SoC package instead of a DIMM module.But are they? The memory architecture in Apple Silicon is integrated - do they just use the exact same chips that you'd find in a stick of PC RAM, only soldered into the M3 (or whatever version) unit?