Pathetic. Justifying 8 GB of Ram in 2023 at $1600 is insane. Pro moniker aside. That said, it's Apple job to make money. If people buy it, so be it.
Agree! The same people that complain that Apple doesn’t give enough options are the same ones that will complain if they take away the 8gb option. A bunch of complainers. There’s no satisfying them.This again. Apple is not responsible if you buy less RAM then you need for your use case.
Also considering they probably have 2 years worth of 4gb chips in inventory, they arent going to toss them out.. And if you understand how product lines work, yes apple has 2 years worth of inventory on stuff like memory chips. Either in warehouse or in production contractsNo.
1. Keep starting price at $1599, upgrade all 8 GB to 16 GB: Apple loses potential profit of $185/unit.
2. Raise starting price to $1799, remove 8 GB models: Apple loses potential sale due to higher starting price.
Apple has done the market research and knows that starting at 8 GB is the sweet spot. Moving in either direction leads to loss of potential revenue.
What are you on about? The 8 GB model is already at a reduced price compared to the 16 GB model.I really admire your relentless defense of the 8GB model, but I have to say, the price (or cost) isn’t a separate issue – it's the main issue. Why not start at 16 or 32 then? Like I said before, Apple could flip it and start with 16 or 32GB. For users who don't need that much memory, they could choose to 'reduce' it. Oh, but sorry, this game might be tough to play because, in Apple's world, 8GB is actually bigger than a WinPC's 16GB – I mean, in terms of price.
Wow, because when I had an entry level M1 iMac, I used Photoshop with large PSD and PSB files daily. I never had issues with slow downs or lag.Even my Mac that only sees office use needs more than 8GB. And as I said above, nobody would complain about the 8GB base models if the upgrade prices were, say, just 2x the normal rate instead of 5x or whatever it is.
Sweet spot for ensuring their customers will want to buy a new Mac sooner.Apple has done the market research and knows that starting at 8 GB is the sweet spot.
Yes, there is satisfying us. Lower the upgrade pricing from "completely ridiculous" to just "somewhat expensive".The same people that complain that Apple doesn’t give enough options are the same ones that will complain if they take away the 8gb option. A bunch of complainers. There’s no satisfying them.
It's a Pro laptop. Daddy Apple got your wrapped.Why are they testing these kind of software on this machine?
If you even know the names of these software and what they do, then you also know this is not the machine to do that work with.
This is clearly a machine aimed squarely at students, writers, office workers, etc. So test it with Chrome, Page, Excel, Keynote (or the M$ equivalents), Zoom, playing Youtube/Netflix, etc.
Not everyone is a YouTube content creator.
What an absolute shocker
Continuing to be amazed that some people are defending 8 GB of RAM in a $1600 "pro" laptop.
Another low-quality clickbait from that channel, which doesn't know what they're talking about. Every configuration has a bottleneck.
Would you call the base M chip a bottleneck too?
Need more? Buy more. Simple as that. Not everyone needs 16 GB.
I thought Tim Crook was the MASTER of product lines & inventory.Also considering they probably have 2 years worth of 4gb chips in inventory, they arent going to toss them out.. And if you understand how product lines work, yes apple has 2 years worth of inventory on stuff like memory chips. Either in warehouse or in production contracts
This is exactly how it works, 100% ... Open up a web browser and type in CPU binning, and learn something... we can talk afterThat's not how it works...
You can turn off a CPU or GPU core that doesn't work. If the memory or storage controllers are broken then you just can't use that chip.
But why does a banker, doctor or lawyer need to run Lightroom or FCP? Or are they not professionals?It's a Pro laptop. Daddy Apple got your wrapped.
And for these people, Apple offers the MacBook Air or - even more likely - an iPad. Macs labeled Pro should start with 16GB of RAM. Eventually, they probably will. But only after the rest of the computing world moves on to 32GB.The 8gb market are people who casually browse the web, or watch a video, or check their financials. There’s a lot of those people, and they will not see any performance hiccups doing this.
Anyone else, buy the 16gb or better.
I'm an electrical engineer with a PhD. 8 GB is a bottleneck for the tasks they tested on. That doesn't mean it will be one for many other tasks most users will actually be performing.Haha. Let’s see your video on the topic. Seems they triggered you by showing how ridiculous 8gb is in this day and age, especially at the price Apple is charging. Keep drinking the kool-aid.
I doubt that people that casually browse the web will buy a Pro version. If I buy a Proversion I assume the base model will be capable of doing those with ease and not in need of another upgrade on top.The 8gb market are people who casually browse the web, or watch a video, or check their financials. There’s a lot of those people, and they will not see any performance hiccups doing this.
Some of those people would pay extra to have a nice screen though. And this model is aimed at that market.And for these people, Apple offers the MacBook Air or - even more likely - an iPad. Macs labeled Pro should start with 16GB of RAM. Eventually, they probably will. But only after the rest of the computing world moves on to 32GB.