DittoI can't really seem to find any microscratches yet on my Watch body, but there are a good number of them on the clasp of the Milanse Loop. It doesn't really bother me though.
DittoI can't really seem to find any microscratches yet on my Watch body, but there are a good number of them on the clasp of the Milanse Loop. It doesn't really bother me though.
904L is MUCH harder.
Something without a case makes me want to scratch it up a bit and get it over with.
Since the watch will have finger smudges on it 90% of the time, you can't see the scratches anyway, just annoyed that it got that scratched up in a week.
You might be correct, but most of the materials suppliers I use and know will disagree with you[size=-2][1][2][/size]--904L (UB6) is primarily used over 316L for corrosion resistance, with the hardness primarily a function of how the material is worked and finished, the range being 70-95 Rockwell-B.
[size=-2]
1. Stainless Steel - Grade 904L (UNS N08904) on AZO Materials
2. Stainless Steel - Grade 316L - Properties, Fabrication and Applications (UNS S31603) on AZO Materials
[/size]
Not everyone subscribes to the aesthetic notion that scratches add character and that patina is something to be envied. While I am highly skilled at removing scratches, I can certainly see how someone with a highly polished watch might be concerned about scratches after two weeks. It's like finding dents on your new car.
To me, signs of wear and tear indicate a person that is getting out and doing things, not turtling up and squandering possessions as if they will last forever. It's a watch, meant to be worn, used, and seen (to some). Take it in twice a year for a nice polishing as the other fellow recommended and just let it ride. Nobody but nobody will see those abrasions. FWIW I got my SS on the 24th and (looking at it with a glass now) looks pristine and I am not rubbing it down at all. -Cheershmm, well lets see what apple says, i also have the issue of the haptic feedback getting lighter then day one. If I do get a replacement, I won't be using the same microfiber rag. What are you wiping yours with?
To me, signs of wear and tear indicate a person that is getting out and doing things, not turtling up and squandering possessions as if they will last forever. It's a watch, meant to be worn, used, and seen (to some). Take it in twice a year for a nice polishing as the other fellow recommended and just let it ride. Nobody but nobody will see those abrasions. FWIW I got my SS on the 24th and (looking at it with a glass now) looks pristine and I am not rubbing it down at all. -Cheers
Exactly, I knew it would scratch just was surprised how quick the scratches became so prevalent.
Yes. You're original inquiry pertained to Hardness.
I think you're having trouble following the conversation.
I still believe 904L is not any harder than 316L. Stronger, more corrosion resistant. But not harder. I wasn't inquiring about it, I was stating it.
On the other side, you state that 904L is MUCH harder than 316L (emphasis yours), but almost all material suppliers disagree with you, and the grading for these alloys usually give a range of hardness where both are the same. Usually it's shown that 316L can be worked to ultimately be harder than 904L.
I hope that was clear!
I have been babying my Apple Watch SS for just over a week now. I have only wiped it down with a micro-fiber cloth used for glasses and when I look under a desk lamp, the polished stainless steel is already full of micro scratches. It looks like I have been wearing the watch for a year.
Pics attached
Very bummed.
I guess it truly is like the SS on the back of an iPod. Can just imagine how dull the polished finish is gonna look in a year
Anyone else notice this on their SS? Its a beautiful watch, i really want a sapphire display too so the sport is kind of not an option
The SS on the Apple watch seems much different than that on my current Cartier watch and on a Rolex I had several years ago (and stupidly traded in for something else). The steel on those watches is sort of brushed and scratches hardly show up. My Cartier is steel with quite a bit of 18K gold and the gold is scratched, too... but none of the scratches on the gold or the steel really show up unless you look closely.
The shiny SS chrome-like surface used by Apple emphasizes the slightest scratch or imperfection. I have a SS AW coming tomorrow and am glad to hear that you all are A-OK with scratches. I normally am a bit OCD so will have to just let this go!!
You obviously haven't seen the scratch test someone did then. (think it got posted on the SB SS thread).
Here it is again for your convenience: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02LAMOpEVq4
(sorry to the SS guys, but if Apple does the DLC properly, it'll be pretty tough).
I didn't want to read through the entire 100 posts, so if it's mentioned I apologize. Go to Amazon and look up "cape cod cloth". I have used this on polished watches as it was recommended to me, works like a charm.