With my relatives it's easy, Signal. Whenever I can convince someone to use Signal, I do. For the rest of the world, it's WhatsApp.
Yes, Signal is another app under my radar.
With my relatives it's easy, Signal. Whenever I can convince someone to use Signal, I do. For the rest of the world, it's WhatsApp.
If Apple wants to escape, they have to prove the numbers, and for DMA all that matters are the numbers. Just in 2022 they sold 56 million iPhones in the EU, sumIt does matter. I had phones with un-installable Facebook apps, yet I don't have an account. It doesn't make me a user.
I don't use iMessage, as in I don't send SMS messages and I never receive iMessage messages.
So perhaps my phone does have the capability (I don't remember any activation) but an iMessage user I am not and it would a factual error to consider me one.
They did according to my understanding of tech companies. We already clarified this didn't we?I was highlighting that the lists you originally provided yourself didn't contain anything of substance?
If you actually read the text is "monthly active end users". Having iMessage installed and activated isn't enough, Apple has only to prove they have fewer than 45 million active users, which I guess applies to them, otherwise they wouldn't argue it.If Apple wants to escape, they have to prove the numbers, and for DMA all that matters are the numbers. Just in 2022 they sold 56 million iPhones in the EU, sum
up the last 3 years and they are easily over it. Specially with iMessage being activated by default on iPhone,macOS,iPadOS setup. These device platforms don’t count separately. Alone with business users they are surely over it, almost all devs have iMessage activated and they count as business users. Simply as that!
- The control of an important gateway for business users towards final consumers: when the company provides a core platform service to more than 45 million monthly active end users established or located in the EU and to more than 10,000 yearly active business users established in the EU;
If you actually read the text is "monthly active end users". Having iMessage installed and activated isn't enough, Apple has only to prove they have fewer than 45 million active users, which I guess applies to them, otherwise they wouldn't argue it.
Like I said, they cannot possibly count me as an active iMessage user, even if I have an iPhone/iPad/Macbook with iMessage on them.
Yes, it does. It provides a specific definition for different core platform services. Scroll all the way to the bottom.The DMA doesn't specify that "active" needs to mean you sending messages, it can simply mean you being signed into the service. There's probably good reasons to not approach it this way, but it's not as clear cut as you make it appear.
None of that is true.Specially with iMessage being activated by default on iPhone,macOS,iPadOS setup. These device platforms don’t count separately. Alone with business users they are surely over it, almost all devs have iMessage activated and they count as business users. Simply as that!
Yes, it does. It provides a specific definition for different core platform services. Scroll all the way to the bottom.
Regulation - 2022/1925 - EN - EUR-Lex
eur-lex.europa.eu
"Number of unique end users who initiated or participated in any way in a communication through the number-independent interpersonal communication service at least once in the month."
None of that is true.
Well they try to clarify it in the Annex, and if you read A.1 you'll see that businesses self-report the number of active users, while A.3, talking about unique users, says "[...]no matter how many times they engaged with the relevant core platform service over that period".The DMA doesn't specify that "active" needs to mean you sending messages, it can simply mean you being signed into the service. There's probably good reasons to not approach it this way, but it's not as clear cut as you make it appear.
LOL! I can start by naming 2 companies without which the iPhone would never have happened:And before you continue, yes, there are innovative tech companies in Europe. But most of them are not very competitive on the world stage. There are, of course, some that are competitive. I'm speaking as a whole.
Well they try to clarify it in the Annex, and if you read A.1 you'll see that businesses self-report the number of active users, while A.3, talking about unique users, says "[...]no matter how many times they engaged with the relevant core platform service over that period".
If they use the word "engaged" it's hard to make a case for your interpretation. Merely having it activated is not "engaged". One would need to engage with iMessage, i.e. send at least one iMessage-message during the last month to be counted as an active user.
I checked my iPhone and I never sent an iMessage, and the last time I received an iMessage was Apr 21st 2022. I don't think any reasonable interpretation using the DMA text would count me as an active user.
Based on "Number of unique end users who initiated or participated in any way in a communication through the number-independent interpersonal communication service at least once in the month.", I'd say that simply opening the app won't do it. Plus, I don't think Apple tracks that and I doubt the EU would make them track the simple opening of the Messages app.We’ll know how the EC interprets this when they publish their list tomorrow.
But I guess if they wanted to they could say that as long as you open the Message app on your phone and iMessage is enabled you are technically engaging with iMessage (because this App is the client application for iMessage and presumably connects to an iMessage server when you start it).
I agree it would be quite a stretch, but it would put Apple in a tricky situation: either the refuse to comply and engage in a legal battle (with no guarantee of winning and knowing that even if they win, the only way for them to remain out of scope is for iMessage to remain a failure in Europe which is an ackward situation); or they just go for the easy route and they don’t dispute the interpretation.
And how exactly are they currently competitive? Nokia doesn't even exist, what is called Nokia now are just remnants after Microsoft purchased them. Ericsson hasn't done anything on its own in almost 20 years.LOL! I can start by naming 2 companies without which the iPhone would never have happened:
Nokia and Ericsson
From the UK also and would say the complete opposite. Hate Whatsapp, hate everything about it. Have no reason for it since everyone I know is on iMessage and prefers it. There have been a small few who weren’t but it’s a great excuse not to speak to them.Most people look at me like I'm an idiot when I say they can just message me through iMessage instead of WhatsApp. I'm in the UK by the way.
It's got to the point I give up and just installed WhatsApp. I hate Meta but it's less hassle. I like iMessage but now I've been using WhatsApp I can see why it's prefered. WhatsApp is by far the better communication platform.
No doubt that Europe is too highly regulated to show a huge amount of innovation, but there's some - without doing any research Spotify and Linux come to mind...
But don't forget that all those US tech giants have lots and lots of R&D in Europe.
Yes, the US is the world’s tech nexus and I think it will remain so for the foreseeable future.The problem is that way too much of it is directly tied to or funnels into U.S. (or Asian) companies and products instead of creating new/separate competition.
You can use an iPhone without an AppleID. You can use an iPhone without signing in to iMessage. You can be signed in to iMessage but never actually use it. You can use it for a while then stop using it.iMessage has as many users the iPhone has, simply as that. Apple will have to open it or get fined.
The list also goes way, way down when you cut the UK out and just talk EU.And before you continue, yes, there are innovative tech companies in Europe. But most of them are not very competitive on the world stage. There are, of course, some that are competitive. I'm speaking as a whole.
And the opposite here in the states. Go figure.That's true. WhatsApp all the way over here.
Many US readers don't understand how small share iPhone (and Apple products in general) has in the Europe compared to the US. Wast majority owns Android over here.
I think you just answered your question. They want people to use it, but if disclosing the active monthly users in the EU gets them out of messy compliance with a stupid law, they'll take it.I bet there are past articles from Apple saying how popular imessage is and that more people should adopt it over it's rivals but now to prevent imessage from having to work with rivals Apple are saying imessage actually is not popular and therefore should not be touched by the EU.
Apple are very happy to postulate how good and popular an iphone feature is but when regulators come calling, suddenly Apple downplays how popular the iphone feature actually is.
Personally, I would take the fine… and raise the price of iPhone to offset it in the EU.iMessage has as many users the iPhone has, simply as that. Apple will have to open it or get fined.
Messages are too important. and personal.... I trust apple to keep them private, not What's App.It definitely is possible. And to be honest. Cross-platform open-standard like iMessage would be great.
It has the biggest feature....Encrpytion and security....iMessage is the worst. It's lacking basic features and is full of silly nonsense.
That's like saying alternative news..... Tech companies are tech companies. No more comments needed.They did according to my understanding of tech companies. We already clarified this didn't we?
We had different understanding of the definition of tech companies. You were not happy with mine and so I provided updated list which matches your definition. Is there problem with this? Why argue over this?