Maybe Apple is just having some projectors custom built for the Apple stores. A little birdie told me they have not been happy with the installs at some locations....
Originally posted by backdrifter
Any download format would likely distribute movies in MPEG-4, which achieves the best compression to quality ratio. That being said, about the smallest file size you could achieve for an average movie would be 750 MB while still maintaining acceptable quality. What you get on your cable modem is is 800 Kbps, as in bits not bytes. So, lets do a calculation:
750 MB = 750000000 B = 6000000000 b (bits) / 800000 bps = 7500 seconds = 125 minutes ~ 2 hours
Now, that is assuming a near utopia. Distributing movies that will pass for acceptable on a home theater system, will likely mean at least double the quality of my example (4 hours to download). In addition, the majority of the population would be lucky to achieve average d/l rates of 200 kbps (16 hours to download).
(...)
Edit: Miswrote bytes instead of bits. Corrected. [/B]
Originally posted by Macrumors
This AVSForum post claims that Apple will be entering the high-end projector market.
Originally posted by mbs
Assume the 2 hours download for a 2 hour film would be reasonable: Why then not use streaming from a streaming server - the iVideo store? Say for the price you pay for lending a DVD you can view a streamed video, which can't be stored - the film industry would also be happy ... and you get instantaneous access at the time you want to see the movie.
Clean Slate
As someone involved with both Apple and home theater, I think I can crystal ball this with some good guesses.
First, I guarantee this wont be a high end projector. It absolutely will not cost more than $2995. More likely this is a $1495 unit.
This is not a projector for home theater. Go back to Apple's pain points. What do you think Steve Jobs does every day? Watch Keynote.app presentations on crappy third-party projectors which universally have (1) the worst user interfaces for configuration known to man even on the very best of these beasts, (2) horrible industrial design vis a vis shoddy casing, shoddy lenses, shoddy video sync, and millions of complex options hidden away in inaccessible menus that require calling your IT person to fix, (3) neither DVI nor ADC nor any other acceptable connector according to Apple. The PAIN POINT is that everybody with an Apple laptop walks around and needs a funky adapter to hookup to these shoddy projectors. What better way to fix that problem than taking a 10 ton club and pounding these losers out of the market. At worst, it will make the competition sit up and start paying attention to their products.
Really, this low-mid range business projector market is quite ripe for the picking. Like MP3 players years ago, it is inhabited only by companies that couldn't care less about creating an insanely great product and simply add another few irrelevant features every year packed into their badly integrated products.
Apple already has a display division (unlike the printer division they nuked years ago, they're quite serious about displays). These engineers haven't got much to do. They're already years ahead of the competition. Dell's best computer display is a mediocre 20" LCD (ignoring their OEM LCD television nonsense). Apple has a 23" 1080p resolution reference quality graphic design screen that sells like hotcakes.
So what do these people do? OK, they can take the same displays and put them in aluminum cases to handle the latest fad, but these are serious and top notch industrial engineers. You think they're spinning wheels? I think not. So about a year ago (again I'm just hypothesizing here) Apple assigned a group of them to work on an Apple Cinema Projector. Crushing the entire low-mid range business projector market, it would feature 1280x1024 LCD resolution with very high brightness, one ADC port, one DVI port, one VGA port for old-timers, and finally a set of HD component inputs to hook it up to your average home theater setup. All of this packaged in a small, sturdy, aluminum casing.
At $1500, Apple gets 60% market share in 12 months by which time they introduce the version with the iPod dock integrated which plays video effects synchronized to your iPod and integrating with a remote control for both projector and iPod.
The remainder of the market cowers in fear and runs away leaving the entire $800- $3K projector market to Apple.
Apple will never ever enter the true low end projector market, nor would they enter the high end home theater market.
These and other devices would be introduced on February 3 in a special 20th anniversary press event.
Reminder: I don't know anything. But I'd sure like all the above to be true.
(crazy "what if" side idea: put all the guts into the small aluminum case and put the projection eye and lamp onto a metal snake perhaps even suitable for mounting on the top of a laptop screen like the iSight. Think of the Pixar light for instance -- this is the Pixar light productized into a projector. And Ives will get another gold star.)
Originally posted by mbs
Assume the 2 hours download for a 2 hour film would be reasonable: Why then not use streaming from a streaming server - the iVideo store? Say for the price you pay for lending a DVD you can view a streamed video, which can't be stored - the film industry would also be happy ... and you get instantaneous access at the time you want to see the movie.
Originally posted by AndrewMT
Samsung announced its ultra-thin 56" DLP projector screen at CES. DLPs are far superior to plasma and now they can be the same size! Not to mention, DLPs are usually half the cost of plasmas. Doesn't Samsung supply Apple with most of its displays?
Originally posted by Hector
No lg supplys the lcd's in studio displays
Originally posted by backdrifter
Streaming would work in that situation, but that situation is the exception, not the norm. That was quoted at 800 Kbps average download rate. The norm would be more around 200 for broadband users, so the download would take 8 hours. If you did a streaming solution in this scenario, you would have to wait 6 hours for enough content to watch the movie with no interruptions or rebuffering.
Originally posted by Hector
on the subject of HD projectors there is no way that that is possible I was part of the staff of a HD sceminar and they had a jvc HD projector and that cost £100,000!!!! the next one up could only be run by a rack of xserves the reolution was so high but for realisticly priced projectors 1024x768 is the limit that is the reason that I will be investing in two 30" apple studio displays for my g4 cube as soon as apple announces them
Originally posted by paulwhannel
high-definition projectors are currently on the market by several vendors. In fact, the projector I'm considering for my home theater is HDTV-ready, which is an incidental feature (i have little interest in HD). this is a $1500 projector.
paul
Originally posted by Peyote
From the picture, the light seems to be very white to me, but it's hard to tell. Regardless, I would expect this same technology to make it into projectors in the near future.
All projectors are progressive by nature. Most will convert to progressive if fed an interlaced signal--some do this better than others. Most of the consumer ones use the same deinterlacer that is found in popular progressive DVD players... and I've found this to be not nearly as good as can be achieved with a cheap PC running dScaler (open source deinterlacer). This is always limited to the resolution of the projector, however. Most projectors will accept a variety of formats but will ultimately only convert to their native resolution--and again, some do this better than others. I use the same computer (running dScaler) to also do the scaling by running it in the resolution that is native to my projector. This way, the projector only has to actually project the video which is kindof its core competence. Higher resolution projectors of the same quality tend to cost more.Originally posted by mkrishnan
Are HDTV-ready projectors ones that run at 1280x1024 and rescan images, or do they actually run at 1080P?
Originally posted by rtype
All projectors are progressive by nature. Most will convert to progressive if fed an interlaced signal--some do this better than others. Most of the consumer ones use the same deinterlacer that is found in popular progressive DVD players...
Yes, there are projectors that do 1080P natively so you either have to feed it a 1080P signal or let it upconvert whatever you do feed it to 1080P. I only have the Infocus X1 which does 640x480P native, which is great for standard resolution TV and DVD.Originally posted by mkrishnan
Sorry, I meant to ask if it's actually 1080P native. I know they get very close. A lot of consumer flat panel TVs have this issue too....
So are you actually able to receive TV in real time, pipe it through the de-interlacer, and put it on the projector, and if so, does it work pretty well?
BTW, are you "rtype" because of cars or video games? I'm a radiant silvergun fan myself....
Originally posted by rtype
Home theater and business use are not mutual exclusives. The biggest growth section of the projector market is in the crossover projectors--small projectors that are small enough to be portable presentation projectors that also perform well in home theater. What would be silly would be to ignore *either* viable market.
Originally posted by alandail
As a mac user who also has a home theater ... If the AVS source of this rumor is Alan Gouger, it should be a main page rumor and not a page 2 rumor. As a long time AVS reader, Alan Gouger wouldn't post the rumor unless he was confident in his sources.
its talking about digital multimedia type projectors like epson makesOriginally posted by Mason
I'm confused. By projectors do you mean like DLP televisions or am I completely missing it?