No, but it is worth considering the company you’re in. Using unsupported innuendo, but avoiding actually presenting an outright conclusion is a favorite disinformation technique. It puts false information out to dupe the uneducated and conspiracy minded while allowing for a “I never said that” defense when questioned about what is obviously being suggested.
In general, if you mean something it’s best to say it outright.
So I have to ask: you do realize the absurdity of thinking Kary Mullis was killed at the age of 74 in preparation for a globally coordinated fake public health crisis a year later, right?
I’m happy to hear you and your teammates came out of this ok, but I find it dangerous to translate your good fortune into a parable for the masses.
This kind of sounds to me like you’re saying you’re open only to fringe ideas because you had an experience that led to you categorically disbelieve the generally accepted view on everything.
Are you willing to share what those events might have been? Pittsburgh is generally pretty low key. Generally pretty high on lists of America’s most livable cities (if you believe those things… 😉).
And while I’m not generally one to accept a politician’s view on anything, in this case you’re suggesting there’s a conspiracy that spans millions of people, thousands of scientists, and virtually every government in the world except some of the most autocratic.