This is not a political move. This is an instance. Let me try to give you a non-tech example.
Instead of phones, let's talk about safes. Old, 1920s safes that Wile E. Coyote might try to drop on the roadrunner.
Here goes. A man may have some incriminating evidence in his safe. The sheriff has good reason to believe it's there. He calls a locksmith. He is stumped. He calls the manufacturer. They say they may be able to access the safe, but it would make them lose business to just willy-nilly start opening people's safes.
The sheriff goes to the courthouse and asks for a warrant to search the safe. Now that there is legal reason, the manufacturer helps the sheriff get into the safe. That is all that is happening, here.
You folks who think it is political... It would be some crappy government skeeze if the situation was similar to above except...
When the sheriff goes to the judge to ask for help with this particular safe, the judge then orders that the sheriff now has the same type of access to all safe.
That is not what is happening, so stop acting like every one-off situation is the same as some Orwellian dystopian Hell-future.