Originally posted by Chip NoVaMac
But it is a vicious cycle. In order to get into real-estate (using your example), most states require licensing which requires classes. Those classes cost money that many retail workers can scrape together perhaps. Hopefully their employer will not change their schedules at the last minute.
But once they get their license, then comes need need for a decent car (preferably a later model, not too "cheap" for image is important). then according to realtors that I have talked with, if you are "hot" seller - you might see your commissions in 3 to 6 months. Realistically look at 6 to 12 months to start making "real" money. If you are lucky you might get a draw, but in the case of the DC area as of a few years ago, you have to have another source of income.
And keep in mind not everyone is suited for that type of sales. And because of that some here are saying that these people do not deserve a living wage. Yet we have people complain that the house on our block has "way too many people living there". We also seeing people complain about the level of help in the retails stores.
Reminds me many years ago Montgomery County wanted to buy some land in Potomac, MD to build affordable housing. Housing that teachers, firefighters, and general office workers could afford. A woman who owned a home in the Potomac area was quoted as say something along the lines of "i have to work with these people during the day, but I should have to live with them at night".
Reminder that what some of us are talking about are living wages for full-time workers. When you give living wages you generally can expect better motivated workers helping you in the stores. You can generally expect better living conditions for everyone. And you give those that have few other options (for a variety of reasons) a chance to make better their lives.
Will everyone deserve the "living wage"? Probably not. There will always be marginal workers. But a socially responsible society does not "create" marginal workers. And in the US, I would think that both on the left and right would say that we are a socially responsible society. But what both sides have forgotten is that charity (by this I mean this definition: Benevolence or generosity toward others or toward humanity) begins at home.
Remember but for the grace of God, go I.
It seems that a living wage is becoming more and more a relative term. In places like DC (or DC Metro, in your instance), San Fran, Boston, etc., the costs are much higher than other places. Subsidized housing for teachers and firefighters? I didn't realize their economic situation was as dire as displaced manufacturing workers who can't find work, the disabled, the elderly, or the minimum wage earner.
But at any rate, that's off topic. Apple retail is no more grueling than selling handbags at Coach. Since Apple computers are so user freindly and intuitive, they don't (or shouldn't) require to much explanation.
Bottom line is, the cost of living in DC Metro, nor charity, is a compelling argument for Apple retail employees to make signifcantly more than other retailers, or gain significant bonuses from sales. If they were reciveing higher comissions they'd probably jsut get less per hour anyway. I have a feeling they gey on the phone at Dell isn't getting a kickback.