OK Apple shareholders, it's time to self-identify by calling this a bad move for the workers.
Everyone else: let's give a thumbs up.
Everyone else: let's give a thumbs up.
I believe that closing down a store is not feasible considering global situation.Lol
Won’t Apple just shut the store down? 😂🙋♂️
Lol…Apple can close down any store they want to
It’s news because the US is a long way behind many other Western countries in terms of tackling employee exploitation, and there is still a huge imbalance of power. It’s hard for many of us outside the US to really understand, as the culture and political climate is so different to most other places. There will be more unionisation, especially in the ultra-wealthy large corporations, but I suspect it’s unlikely to reach anywhere near the levels that are considered normal and beneficial in the rest of the Western world.Why is this News? In my country, belonging to a union is nearly expected. However, the employers also form a “union” to negotiate the salaries with the respective workers union. It works, we get food on the table, safe workplaces, reasonable job security, there are plenty of room for individual salary negotiations and yet I recently heard my country was the best in the world to do business in but it takes two responsible parties for that.
Boomers have short memories.Labor unions built America.
Well, there goes customer service.
"Hi, can you help me?"
"Sorry, I'm on break."
Cool. So now all the current lazy employees who piss & moan about not being able to make a living on minimum wage (something minimum wage was never intended for) can be even lazier, Apple can't fire them, customer service will head to toilet and prices for Apple goods/services will be even more artifically inflated thanks to these bozos.
Well done.
I don't care about what happens in the EUYou do realize, like, unions are a perfectly normal and common thing in the EU? And yet, somehow, I don't see that people's lives are worse here, whether you're a customer or a service provider.
BTW, maybe people *should* take breaks.
It’s news because the US is a long way behind many other Western countries in terms of tackling employee exploitation, and there is still a huge imbalance of power. It’s hard for many of us outside the US to really understand, as the culture and political climate is so different to most other places. There will be more unionisation, especially in the ultra-wealthy large corporations, but I suspect it’s unlikely to reach anywhere near the levels that are considered normal and beneficial in the rest of the Western world.
I don't care about what happens in the EU
Apple paid the retail employees while the stories were closed by finding them other non-retail remote work to do. Not something they HAD to do, but just something they did. During the next closures, will the union pay their salaries? I guess it depends on their contract.
This is the dumbest thing I’ve read this year.Cool. So now all the current lazy employees who piss & moan about not being able to make a living on minimum wage (something minimum wage was never intended for) can be even lazier, Apple can't fire them, customer service will head to toilet and prices for Apple goods/services will be even more artifically inflated thanks to these bozos.
Well done.
Yeah, some of the responses here - and all the fear - are really weird to me.
Thats fair enough. I appreciate the explanation.Apple could do that. But if that were to happen, I'm sure the employees would go to the National Labor Relations Board and ask them to look into it. If the NLRB determines that Apple closed the store in retailiation, that would be a violation of federal labor law.
Discriminating against employees because of their union activities or sympathies (Section 8(a)(3)) | National Labor Relations Board
It is unlawful to discourage (or encourage) union activities or sympathies "by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment." For example, employers may not discharge, lay off, or discipline employees, or refuse to hire job applicants, because...www.nlrb.gov
Section 8(a)(3) of the Act makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer, "by discrimination in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment[,] to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization." (An employer that violates Section 8(a)(3) also derivatively violates Section 8(a)(1).) For example, you may not:
- Close one of your facilities, if your motive is to chill unionism at any remaining facility and such an effect is reasonably foreseeable.
On the other hand, Apple could close all their retail locations and get away with that according to the ruling in Textile Workers Union v. Darlington Mfg. Co., 380 U.S. 263 (1965)
1. It is not an unfair labor practice for an employer to close his entire business, even if the closing is due to anti-union animus. Pp. 380 U. S. 269-274.
At least that's my understanding of it. 🤷♂️
What?Apple paid the retail employees while the stories were closed by finding them other non-retail remote work to do. Not something they HAD to do, but just something they did. During the next closures, will the union pay their salaries? I guess it depends on their contract.
Key word: responsible parties.Why is this News? In my country, belonging to a union is nearly expected. However, the employers also form a “union” to negotiate the salaries with the respective workers union. It works, we get food on the table, safe workplaces, reasonable job security, there are plenty of room for individual salary negotiations and yet I recently heard my country was the best in the world to do business in but it takes two responsible parties for that.
A contract “can” guarantee that IF those terms are in the contract that’s negotiated. If those terms aren’t in there, then it won’t be guaranteed.Let’s flip that script for a sec. Another way of saying what you just said is “Apple was under no obligation to take care of its staff during COV19, and while it did so the there’s no way for staff to be sure it will do so again in the future, but a union contract *can* guarantee that”
Hopefully, their union can negotiate that in their contract. If they can’t, folks in other stores would be paid if a shutdown is needed again, these employees wouldn’t.I also know business that paid their employees just to sit home and do nothing waiting for pandemic to clear. Apple could have done the same but instead they chose to reshuffled them and keep them busy. It was cheaper for them to keep them on the payroll then to lay em all off and then hire new people once the store is up and running.
No, no… I’m sure there’s much dumber things you’ve read this year. Let’s not be dramatic 😄This is the dumbest thing I’ve read this year.