Should I cancel my Apple TV order and buy a Shield instead?
Not with Apple TV they haven’t. It’s hardly been a success to date has it? It’s been massively outsold by devices by amazon and roku. In my opinion this is because Apple have charged more for something which is blatantly an inferior product. There hasn’t been a single compelling reason to go for the Apple TV over its competitors to date. Now they’ve maybe got something in that they’re giving people cheap 4k media but up until last month all I’ve been hearing is that ‘People aren’t bothered about 4k’. Now I’m supposed to believe that ‘people are bothered enough about 4k to pay more than double the price for an Apple TV but....people aren’t bothered that it’ll look like **** on their TVs’
And while we’re at it, do you think that apple’s competitors will continue to keep selling 4k media at their inflated prices. And when the inevitable price drop happens....why should people buy an Apple TV with its failure to output films in native frame rate, native resolution and inability to play the vast majority of sound formats which have been standard for the past 10 or so years.
Thanks, I do not yet have a 4k TV, so the benefits may not be worth it for me.That really depends on what you intend to use it for? The shield TV isn’t perfect either. If it’s streaming local media you might be better looking at a Vero 4k.
The first 3 Apple TVs has no advertisements whatsoever. It was a hobby that was buried deep in the iPod section of Apple’s website. It was also largely ignored by Steve Jobs and Tim Cook until recent history. So of course other devices had better market share. And only Cinephiles and techies (like you and I) care about frame rates or true 4K. The market out there buys 4k TVs because the manufacturers pushed it hard on the market. And end up watching 720i content on it.
You realize the argument you are making about the ATV is the same one made on this forum of all Apple’s devices. And yet they sell displays being “inferior” if the market truely cares why is Apple selling so much product???
Does the general tv watching public even care about 24fps?? I am talking about the bulk of the population that buys this stuff.
why then would any company include stuff they don’t care about?
Yes it does. RC on does a proper 5:5 pulldown on all 24hz material. When turned off the tv performs 3:2 on all 24hz material. You must have RC on for 24hz for correct cadence.
Anyone who does care, like me, won't be buying the ATV4K until the problem is fixed.
Apple has included Hybrid Log Gamma. Does the bulk of the population care about that? The amount of content in 24p, basically every movie, is enormous. The amount of content in HLG doesn't amount to a mouse fart.
So, because this claim blew my mind, I had to go double check, and it turns out you are right. LG for some braindead reason, made 2:2/5:5/10:10 pulldown an option. Jebus. Meanwhile, other companies just do it when fed a 24p source and call it a day.
Why the hell LG even allows you to have 3:2 pulldown on a pure 24p source boggles my mind. But, you are actually right here.
At this rate, with 5 iterations over 10 years on the Apple TV, I don't think Apple's interest is in providing 24p. 10 years without the feature so far. Sucks. But it's also become such a common problem that TV manufacturers are putting processing power into fixing the 3:2 pulldown, with some decent success.
I do care, but at this point, it's a mix of: either I skip out on some of the more useful streaming boxes in the market (Apple TV, Fire Stick, Roku, etc), or I use those streaming boxes as a supplement to my BD player. Unfortunately, I'm not quite willing to skip out on the market right now.
The significance of HLG is that it does not require metadata, which makes it suitable for live production pipelines (it's impractical to use HDR10 or DV for live broadcasts). So it would be a smart choice for Apple to support this. But has it been confirmed that the ATV4K actually supports HLG? It would require HDMI 2.0b, while Apple's specs say the ATV4K only supports 2.0a.Apple has included Hybrid Log Gamma. Does the bulk of the population care about that? The amount of content in 24p, basically every movie, is enormous. The amount of content in HLG doesn't amount to a mouse fart.
Just use your TVs in built apps. Netflix certainly plays at native frame rate on my LG OLED and the Netflix interface is identical to that on the 4th gen Apple TV.
But has it been confirmed that the ATV4K actually supports HLG?
Especially around audio, as that and motion processing were two reasons I passed on an LG OLED myself.
Behavior and performance of Smart TV apps tends to range from "acceptable, if ARC cooperates" to "trash fire". LG is in the former group. But because of the various pitfalls, it's not quite as easy as you make it out to get a working setup with the built-in stuff. Especially around audio, as that and motion processing were two reasons I passed on an LG OLED myself.
do we know the reason why 24hz output was left out ? like the official reasoning ?
Am I missing something here? Hz is the refresh rate of a display, not the FPS.
Can't wait to see what the the naysayers have to say to this observation!I just got my ATV4k delivered and I'm seeing in the Video Settings->Other Formats a listing of 4k HDR at 30Hz, 25Hz, and 24Hz. I have not read through this thread to see if I'm covering something someone has already mentioned, but just wanted to offer. Also have no idea if these are native or going through conversions.