He is a big clown. Nothing surprising here.
Please don't denigrate perfectly respectable clowns with that comparisonHe is a big clown. Nothing surprising here.
I thought that $1B break up fee was if the SEC terminated the deal. He is backing out himself, there is no limit to the damages he can be sued for because of it.
For sure, but so can he. A better one even.I have no doubt Twitter can hire a strong legal team.
The fee is between Musk and Twitter and comes into play if either party decides to cancel the deal.
If Musk cancels, he owes Twitter the fee. If Twitter cancels (to accept a richer offer), then they owe Musk the fee.
As Musk has signaled his intent to cancel, he owes the fee to Twitter.
It is amazing how people on the internet just act like they know things and say them when they are actually wrong, isn't it?This is false, the fee only comes into play if a third party (like the SEC) cancels the deal.
They don't know what they want.So do people want him to lose and thus own twitter? I am confused...
I think most rational people don't want this. The guy has become unhinged in the past few years. It would be a really bad idea to give him control of one of the largest social media platforms in the world.So do people want him to lose and thus own twitter? I am confused...
Sued? Twitter said that there were only "x%" of bots, and multiple independent bodies found that Twitter mis-represented material facts in the number of bots. This is what we call "fraud". In fact, what will likely happen next is that advertisers, who were promised an engagement platform of reaching potential customers, were in fact, paying inflated prices to advertise to non-entity bots. That is fraud, against multiple advertisers, over years. Share Holders, who were told in SEC filings that Twitter engaged with some number of people on their platform, were lied to.Hahah.
He'll be sued for billions. There stock dropped because of him. People quit because of him. They laid off people because of him.
Musk is the worst
Which coincidentally Musk does know.It's not rocket science.
I agree. Free publicity. He wanted that and he got it for free. He also made millions off of it.Saw this coming. He never wanted to buy Twitter, he just wanted the press.
The fact that the stock market is affected by one man’s comments on multiple occasions reflects how volatile the market is and the dunces that buy/sell based on this. Similar to how people buy stock before an iPhone comes out then brag…it’s literally a scheduled yearly release the stock market doesn’t work like that and those that think it does are the losers.The way this man is obviously pulling all these stunts to influence stock markets and so far has just gotten away with it is astonishing.
Eat the rich
Ummm, Fraud? The BoD did not own a substantial amount of shares in Twitter; yet were compensated for representing the Share Holders. The number of bots in Twitter was found to be far above the amount stated by the BoD and Sr. Management - it's THEIR JOB to know how many users are real. When you make financial misstatements with the intent to commit fraud, you have broken many Federal, State and local laws. Not the least would beOn what grounds? They had a fiduciary duty to accept his offer once a majority of shareholders agreed to sell the company to Musk.
The board and executives are in a much better legal position in the upcoming flurry of lawsuits than Musk is.
Real question: proving intent could be tricky, yes? Or no: it’s pretty black/white? Again, real question. Thnx.Ummm, Fraud? The BoD did not own a substantial amount of shares in Twitter; yet were compensated for representing the Share Holders. The number of bots in Twitter was found to be far above the amount stated by the BoD and Sr. Management - it's THEIR JOB to know how many users are real. When you make financial misstatements with the intent to commit fraud, you have broken many Federal, State and local laws. Not the least would be
I personally want him to lose 1B or more, not own Twitter, and then get banned from Twitter because he pulled this bull ****.So do people want him to lose and thus own twitter? I am confused...
You want him banned because he has different opinions than you, that's the real reasonI personally want him to lose 1B or more, not own Twitter, and then get banned from Twitter because he pulled this bull ****.