I want an option that my phone is closed and just as it is now? I can no longer have that so I have less options. After regulation there are fewer options almost by definition.More options leads to no more options how?
I want an option that my phone is closed and just as it is now? I can no longer have that so I have less options. After regulation there are fewer options almost by definition.More options leads to no more options how?
And I wish EU bureaucrats would stop whining and bitching and pissing and moaning about an American company and worry about their already-heaping plates.I wish Americans would stop whining about the EU. You’re not in the EU so why do you care?
most of the EU citizen use Andriod phone, but not iPhone.....indeed they think differently and they have different lifestyle and logic thinkingI feel this will only benefit other companies trying to get a slice of Apple’s money. It would turn iOS into a dog’s breakfast. I’d like to see tech giants withdraw from the EU and then watch the citizens of the EU cry about it and lean on the government to bring them back.
Because.What does an “idea” about a law have to do with the actual result of a law. Negative unforeseen disastrous unintended consequences are the norm
with this type of sweeping regulation not the exception.
Hmmm.... I wonder if that would work?
I know some car manufacturers can't bring certain world models to the US because of strict US auto regulations...
Could Apple make a special EU iPhone?
Nope, not due to it’s size, as size would be defined by a numerical value and the numerical size of the market doesn’t factor into the EU’s regulation… or so I’m told.Apple is almost certain to be classified as a "gatekeeper" due to the size
Another example of Tim Cook's failure of leadership and lack of foresight. It was clear where this was headed years ago.
Instead of playing along and offering some concessions, he refused, kept telling countries their rules didn't matter, preferred to pay fines, and now they slap Apple with something this broad. Its his own fault. Most users who were demanding some things open up were asking for reasonable things. And now he's going to have a gigantic patchwork of laws around the world as a result of this that Apple has to comply with.
So the same rules should be applicable in each industry in EU:
1. Medicine
2. Car manufacturers
3. Education
4. Work
5. Providers
Consumers should be given a total freedom in each department. Otherwise no consistency.
It’s biased from EU towards US, period!
Create your own product, promote it, expand it. That’s free market.
Looks like operating in the EU is becoming a lot more expensive for Apple. What’s the EU’s current percentage of Apple’s profits? Something around 20%? And, this regulation would essentially turn that to zero. The EU would go from being number three (behind China) to behind the Asia/Pacific market. The EU already provides the worst margin, it’ll just go to worser-er.The DMA says that gatekeepers who ignore the rules will face fines of up to 10 percent of the company's total worldwide annual turnover, or 20 percent in the event of repeated infringements, as well as periodic penalties of up to 5 percent of the company's total worldwide annual turnover.
A lot of these regulations would enforce a scenario where Apple at the very least has to present the user with multiple choices at every step of setting up and using the device which would over complicate and confuse.
That American company sells on the EU market. That means the EU should have a say in those companies interacting with its consumers, just as I would expect Americans to do the same with a company that sells on the US market.And I wish EU bureaucrats would stop whining and bitching and pissing and moaning about an American company and worry about their already-heaping plates.
Agree. With my small business I won't sell into the EU, it's not worth the aggravation and obstacles.If the cost to apple to comply with these regulations is close to the revenue, I can see apple exiting the EU and let the citizens use android.
The iOS initial setup is already full of ballots, 2-3 more won’t make it worse than it already is.Remember the "browser ballot" on Microsoft Windows in the EU?
Get ready for another "browser ballot" on the iPhone in the EU!
And an "email ballot" (gotta be fair to GMail, ProtonMail, and FastMail)
And a "voice assistant ballot" (gotta be fair to Alexa and Google Assistant)
And a "cloud backup ballot" (gotta be fair to Google Drive, Dropbox, and OneDrive)
And a "streaming music ballot" (gotta be fair to Spotify and Tidal)
And a "streaming video ballot" (gotta be fair to Netflix, Hulu, Paramount+, HBO Max)
Fun times ahead!
🤣
It’s about time to end customer slavery.
Apple's iOS business model relies too much on AppStore revenue for this to be feasible for Apple.no way for that....maybe APPLE should split the business:
1. select your hardware - iPhone 14 w/A16 chip = $999
2. select your ROM - 512 GB = $ 400
3. select your RAM - 512 GB = $ 400
4. select your OS - Microsoft = $300; Google Andriod = $ 300; iOS = $300; Huawei = $150
Yeah! Consumers won and saved money. fair play.
All messaging app based on phone numbers: telegram, messages, whatsapp, signal...It all depends on implementation. The functionality of some messaging apps is very different than others. Then there's the possibility of duplicate accounts and security. And what is considered a messaging app? Would Instagram or Twitter be included as well?