First episode pretty much set up the story of the first book (with a lot of tweaks and additions) - but then the second episode had zero to do with the original trilogy and went distinctly soapy - unless it is based on one of the prequels that I haven’t read.I also reread all of them again. Bloody good TV. Some liberties with the plot but the essence (IMO) of the first chapter of Foundation is in the first TV episode. I get the same feeling with this as I had when I saw the first LOTR film - something classic from a classic source.
Well done all.
However, not counting it out yet - I’m with the school of thought that the original books, for all their genre-defining ideas, were rather tedious exposition dumps told through wooden dialogue that would make lousy TV - so the “suggested by” approach is probably best. Not sure that Asimov could write a compelling character who wasn’t a robot...
Plus, of course, Asimov retconned the original trilogy to smithereens by writing later books that tied the Foundation into everything from the Elijah Bailey novels (which were far better stories and would have been a better bet for TV/Movie IMO) to End of Eternity which was really a bit of a stretch. Various comments/characters in the show suggest that they’re not going with that...