Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

CooperBox

macrumors 68000
Already did it. Mountain biking or Surfing, an original surf watch, the Freestyle Shark watch. When you smash or lose it, you just get another one and don't think twice. They're like candy. They just give you what you need, no extra BS, no updates, and the tiny battery lasts for I dunno a few years? I never even think about the battery level, it's just always on. Got my first one when I was about 10 in the late 80s, and I've lost a few, found a few over the decades. Pretty rugged, pretty waterproof, bright, easy to read, one of the few things I just love. Shark Watch + Nikonos V camera + SexWax = happy times. The rest of the time, I don't wear a watch at all anymore, bc I find things stuck to my body mildly but persistently irritating. I don't even like wearing clothes, but my boss & the cops seem to insist so whatever.
I'm not familiar with the 'SexWax' brand. Are they quartz or mechanical.........
 

ipaqrat

macrumors 6502
Mar 28, 2017
272
291
It would be hard for me to go back to a "dumb" watch. I would just wear 2 watches.

Heck yeah, I get busy with both wrists. For watches, you pervs. Information-heavy AW Ultra on right wrist, Bronze-heavy chronograph on the left. Only I'm the dork that was doing it years before the poptokfinstafluencers deigned to psuedo-coolify it.

Back in high school, I remember the coolest girls used to wear three or four Swatches on each wrist. One girl cleverly set each for a different city timezone somehow related to the graphics.
 

AlaskaMoose

macrumors 68040
Apr 26, 2008
3,504
13,361
Alaska
Wile I don't wear wrist watches anymore, but I prefer a modern wrist watch like the Casio G-Shock to an Apple or similar watch.
 

daneoni

macrumors G4
Mar 24, 2006
11,617
1,162
Dont have an Apple Watch. Just never really been that sold on buying a watch that i'll have to replace, because of its innate planned obsolesce.

That, and i'm not really a gym rat yet.

Been using my trusty Tag i got back in 2005, and the Omega which is probably over 3 decades old now and needs a new battery.

Maybe i'll get an Apple Watch at some point but...not quite sold on it yet personally.

tempImageVvsL0n.png tempImageopASRl.png
 

ericwn

macrumors G4
Apr 24, 2016
11,833
10,418
I went back to traditional watches almost two years ago now and have never looked back. I have a few Seikos that I really enjoy and a small but growing collection of other timepieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

Infinite Vortex

macrumors 6502a
Mar 6, 2015
541
1,107
The moment I get my 1962 Omega Seamaster back from it refurb in Switzerland the electronics are gone! Don't get me wrong, I've learned a lot of valuable information from having a smartwatch but now that I know it the smartwatch it totally unnecessary. And no way will will miss having to be constantly changing that f&%$er! I've come to realise that I only want my watch to tell the time.

Why… it was my father's and it came to him from my great uncle.
 

Heindijs

macrumors 6502
May 15, 2021
331
520
The classic, always stylish and best of all affordable Casio Royale of course. Not that Bond ever wore one in Octopussy or even one similar in Casino Royale but that's just what people like to call it ;)
IMG_3649.jpeg

I do love my Apple Watch though but having a regular watch on just looks better.
 

ericwn

macrumors G4
Apr 24, 2016
11,833
10,418
The classic, always stylish and best of all affordable Casio Royale of course. Not that Bond ever wore one in Octopussy or even one similar in Casino Royale but that's just what people like to call it ;)
View attachment 2334859
I do love my Apple Watch though but having a regular watch on just looks better.

I have the same Royale and it is like a time capsule back to my younger self from many years ago. Fantastic value, super comfortable bracelet, battery lasts for ages, it’s a classic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heindijs

seggy

macrumors 6502
Feb 13, 2016
373
258
The Casio Royale has the classic old Casio look and feel, where it was a cool looking ripoff of a much more expensive Seiko, Brietling, etc that actually did useful stuff with the display unlike on the Casio where it was more for decoration. I still remember a marketing meeting with Casio where fumbling with a watch I asked how to use the bezel and was told it was purely decorative🤣

But with the stainless bracelet it's really unbalanced with a weightless plastic body - it should all be resin, all metal (or ideally, all titanium).

I'd also go with a Casio but I'll probably pick a reconditioned-to-mint TGW-10 (and set the year to 1996 so that the calendar works for a couple of decades) because it went all-in on the embedded circular dials, and it seems much more reminiscent of the original 70's Uchoo Senkan Yamato or Ginga Tetsudou 999 art style that I love.

I do like Citizen EcoDrives as well tho, so fuss-free. So maybe a titanium EcoDrive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Heindijs

Heindijs

macrumors 6502
May 15, 2021
331
520
The Casio Royale has the classic old Casio look and feel, where it was a cool looking ripoff of a much more expensive Seiko, Brietling, etc that actually did useful stuff with the display unlike on the Casio where it was more for decoration. I still remember a marketing meeting with Casio where fumbling with a watch I asked how to use the bezel and was told it was purely decorative🤣

But with the stainless bracelet it's really unbalanced with a weightless plastic body - it should all be resin, all metal (or ideally, all titanium).
30 dollar watch of course, so I wouldn't expect a titanium body. Luckily there are plenty of third parties who make a metal bodies for it, but you'd be looking at 3 time price increase over the watch itself!
But yeah, I agree, Casio has always been one to do decoration. But that's part of the charm for me. And for pure time keeping the Royale is unbeat at its price :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn

seggy

macrumors 6502
Feb 13, 2016
373
258
That's kind of what I mean - if it was a $150-$180 titanium + ti bracelet watch it'd be a slam dunk for someone who wants nostalgia with resin lightness but with something more durable. The AE1200 strap is way too heavy for me for example and I'd never wear it.
 

AlaskaMoose

macrumors 68040
Apr 26, 2008
3,504
13,361
Alaska
That Rolex watch is a beautiful timepiece, but extremely heavy. Also, metallic straps tend to "grab" some of the hairs on one's wrists, and become quite cold when exposed to the cold winter temperatures. If I would have such a watch, I would leave it at home and wear onether that has leather or rubberized straps-if spending time in outdoors in the winter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee

Pakaku

macrumors 68040
Aug 29, 2009
3,139
4,455
This one I still have somewhere, but the battery is definitely dead at this point. It's too bad I don't actually have an electric mouse to recharge it.

il_1588xN.2288951009_9it7.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava

it wasnt me

macrumors regular
Apr 18, 2019
206
122
the internet, mostly
I'm currently thinking about what options I have for this because I can't stand smartwatches. I tried an Apple Watch ages ago, but having to charge a watch every two days just feels wrong (and they are not scratch-resistant enough for people like me); at the same time, I don't want to be constantly staring at my smartphone to see what time it might be at upscale events or on a date.

After reading a lot about movements, cases and crystal glass, I've made a sort of "checklist" for the watch of my choice:

- I want an automatic movement (edit: from anyone but Miyota - they're too loud). Quartz movements are boring.
- Necessary features are a date display and at least slightly illuminated hands.
- Sapphire crystal (or the possibility of using one) is absolutely essential. I'm really clumsy.
- I don't want the watch to be too "smart", so it should go with a shirt and hoodie as well as a fine suit.
- And all this for a maximum of 700 euros, because I'm not only demanding, but also poor.

After reading about twelve billion reviews, I'm undecided between a Hamilton Khaki Auto and a (sapphire-modified) Seiko SRPG, and it looks like the Hamilton has the slight edge. I'll try them both out on Friday.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe

Bungleaio_new

macrumors newbie
Feb 13, 2024
10
9
I'm currently thinking about what options I have for this because I can't stand smartwatches. I tried an Apple Watch ages ago, but having to charge a watch every two days just feels wrong (and they are not scratch-resistant enough for people like me); at the same time, I don't want to be constantly staring at my smartphone to see what time it might be at upscale events or on a date.

After reading a lot about movements, cases and crystal glass, I've made a sort of "checklist" for the watch of my choice:

- I want an automatic movement. Quartz movements are boring.
- Necessary features are a date display and at least slightly illuminated hands.
- Sapphire crystal (or the possibility of using one) is absolutely essential. I'm really clumsy.
- I don't want the watch to be too "smart", so it should go with a shirt and hoodie as well as a fine suit.
- And all this for a maximum of 700 euros, because I'm not only demanding, but also poor.

After reading about twelve billion reviews, I'm undecided between a Hamilton Khaki Auto and a (sapphire-modified) Seiko SRPG, and it looks like the Hamilton has the slight edge. I'll try them both out on Friday.
Have you looked at Christopher Ward? They have some lovely watches. Www.christopherward.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: it wasnt me

AustinIllini

macrumors G5
Oct 20, 2011
12,683
10,517
Austin, TX
I'm currently thinking about what options I have for this because I can't stand smartwatches. I tried an Apple Watch ages ago, but having to charge a watch every two days just feels wrong (and they are not scratch-resistant enough for people like me); at the same time, I don't want to be constantly staring at my smartphone to see what time it might be at upscale events or on a date.

After reading a lot about movements, cases and crystal glass, I've made a sort of "checklist" for the watch of my choice:

- I want an automatic movement (edit: from anyone but Miyota - they're too loud). Quartz movements are boring.
- Necessary features are a date display and at least slightly illuminated hands.
- Sapphire crystal (or the possibility of using one) is absolutely essential. I'm really clumsy.
- I don't want the watch to be too "smart", so it should go with a shirt and hoodie as well as a fine suit.
- And all this for a maximum of 700 euros, because I'm not only demanding, but also poor.

After reading about twelve billion reviews, I'm undecided between a Hamilton Khaki Auto and a (sapphire-modified) Seiko SRPG, and it looks like the Hamilton has the slight edge. I'll try them both out on Friday.
Tissot PRX is killer.
 

it wasnt me

macrumors regular
Apr 18, 2019
206
122
the internet, mostly
I had actually considered the PRX Powermatic for a while, but (like the Presage Cocktail Time) it just looks too classy for everyday wear. I really like its specs, but I walk around in a (t-)shirt and trainers about 360 days a year and I'm afraid the PRX would just look a bit silly.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.