8+ : top of the line iPhone at its timeIf anything, I would say the 15 Plus would be more equivalent to the 8 Plus. There really was no equivalent to today's Pro models. The closest in 2017 may have been the X which launched just two months after the 8 models.
The depth of the 8 Plus is 0.30 inches (I mistakenly put 0.31 inches in my previous post) and the depth of the iPhone 15 Plus is 0.31 inches. Even the 15 Pro and Pro Max are only 0.32" depth. Again, differences are negligible even for phones.
I mean, certainly that's possible, but it's not just a "thickness — battery" axis, there's the cameras and other components. You can't get everything everyone ones—constantly improving optics, battery life, speed, etc. and not expect knock-on effects. Making a phone thicker is a comparatively "cheap" way of solving a lot of them, especially when you can't just charge $5K for a phone.8+ : top of the line iPhone at its time
15 Pro : current top of the line phone
But anyway, this discussion on comparisons in the fraction of a mm/in range leads nowhere.
It's just that some of us want thinner iPhones than the current ones, and that we/I believe this should be feasible technologically, without sacrificing battery capacity.
yes, I already admitted/stated in an earlier post that I'm aware brighter lenses, bigger sensors, better cameras need space and there are physical limitations to the shrinkage factor.I mean, certainly that's possible, but it's not just a "thickness — battery" axis, there's the cameras and other components. You can't get everything everyone ones—constantly improving optics, battery life, speed, etc. and not expect knock-on effects. Making a phone thicker is a comparatively "cheap" way of solving a lot of them, especially when you can't just charge $5K for a phone.
8+ : top of the line iPhone at its time
15 Pro : current top of the line phone
No, because they’re smaller and lighter. Current iPhones are too large and heavy.Picked up the 8 Plus after using the 15 series for a while, and it hit me: the older phones are so much easier to hold and carry because they’re thinner.
Current phones are too thick.
Too large and heavy for you, although I like how my 15 PM is noticeably lighter than my 13 PM it is not something on its own would have upgraded for if my 13 hadn't been stolen.No, because they’re smaller and lighter. Current iPhones are too large and heavy.
It's worth noting that at one time, Apple thought thin was important enough to make it a headline feature (of the 6):
"dramatically thin design"
"comfortable to hold"
Haven't heard those things out of Cupertino lately, have we?
?? What iPhone do you own where you need to be "tethered to your charger all day" ? Neither my 14 Pro nor 15 Pro Max required me to be tethered to my charger all day; ran a battery down to zero only once, and that was due to PEBKAC.better to have a phone with some thickness so you aren't tethered to your charger all day
It is not simply "if you try hard enough," it is about cost to engineer, produce and distribute tens of millions of some very latest high-tech thing every year.yes, I already admitted/stated in an earlier post that I'm aware brighter lenses, bigger sensors, better cameras need space and there are physical limitations to the shrinkage factor.
Physics also limit battery sizes, if capacities are supposed to stay equal or become better.
However, the new iPads to be announced soon will supposedly get significantly thinner than the current generations. How is that possible? The current ones are so thin already.
So if you try hard enough.....that's all I'm saying.
Thankfully, they’ve since gotten their priorities in order. I’m very happy with the thickness of my 13. I’d even take an extra millimetre for some more battery life.It's worth noting that at one time, Apple thought thin was important enough to make it a headline feature (of the 6):
"dramatically thin design"
"comfortable to hold"
Haven't heard those things out of Cupertino lately, have we?
If phones were the size of--and a replacement for--wallets, that would be one thing. But they're not, despite the Apple Pay thinking that the only thing that goes in wallets is a card or two. Nonsense. In Europe it's even worse: Europeans typically travel with a wallet full of coins, cards, bills, etc. That's one pocket, taken up fully by a wallet stuffed to the brim. No room in that pocket for anything else.
So what we have in our pockets these days is wallet, keys, airpods, and phone, maybe coins (if in America), and more, and that's just too much. The size and thickness of these phones make it way, way too much.
we just want to challenge Apple to make the phones thinner but still provide an equal or better capacity battery. But they won't listen to me anyway, so don't worry...