As a longtime Apple fan and user of some version of an iPad Pro as my primary daily computing device for the better part of at least 5-6 years, I can’t believe I’m going to be the one to defend a Google tablet.
I think Google did nearly exactly what they should. Android tablets are, let’s be honest, a failed category to this point. There’s no way they were going to attract a measurable number of customers (and they still may not) for anything beyond a lower priced, general use tablet. A ‘Pro’ tablet would’ve been an immediate failure. Google’s done the high end before (Chromebook Pixel, Pixelbook, Pixel Slate) and while they were solid pieces of hardware, there’s a reason why there is no longer a version for sale. Only ‘successful’ Google tablet was the Nexus 7 and it was a budget model.
They need to hope to pull customer’s away from the base model iPads, iPads most of those customers are using for daily consumption of media, games, web browsing, checking email. None of those customers care about a stylus or attaching it to a keyboard. And to be fair, you don’t need a robust, expansive Android tablet app ecosystem beyond what already exists to succeed here as the usual suspects (Netflix, YouTube, Gmail, Chrome) are just fine right now.
On paper, this is generally on par or even better than the corresponding entry level iPads (9th or 10th gen), at a better price with a useful base accessory. This meant to be used exactly as Google is marketing it—for the family to use around the house.
This tablet isn’t for most of the members posting in this thread/forum—it’s for our less techie family and friends. This is a great option for a household with kids, a far less expensive solution than having to get multiple iPads since Apple doesn’t let you set up multiple user profiles on a single device.
I’m not getting one because it’s not for me. If this was ten years ago when my kids were 9, 8, and 5 years old, yeah, I very well might have.
While I agree with your premise the Pixel Tablet is really not priced at a budget price.
Sure when comparing to the base iPad it is nicer that is not a very high bar. Specially when you can get an iPad air 5th gen for $499 on sale.
Google of they wanted to reach the "Nexus" or budget market should have priced between $349-$399. Then I would agree it is a better value but priced the same as the air even with double the storage the air is a much better tablet.
So my point is Google didn't hit the high end and didn't hit the budget market which is going to hurt them. Also, generally speaking not a lot of budget buyers have a lot of smart home devices.
I think it would have been better to offer a cheaper stand alone tablet and a more expensive Pro version later in the year. They would have hit both markets and been able to determine based on sales which is more popular and focus more on whichever market that was.
The way they have done things I just don't think will be a success.