Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple_Robert

Contributor
Sep 21, 2012
34,529
50,123
In the middle of several books.
I would say, if the decision is between having Fall Detection or having AOD, I would go with Fall Detection because of the potential of saving my life in an accident. AOD is just to look pretty.
Yea, I plan on keeping FD enabled after this test. I like knowing the watch is helping to provide extra safety. Noise detection is another battery drainer. I have that turned off, as I don't have a constant need to analyze questionable sound.
 

Royksöpp

macrumors 68020
Nov 4, 2013
2,284
3,816
Someone earlier suggested disabling the Noise app. I tried it and I've noticed better battery life.
 

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
Yes I have Noise disabled, Hey Siri disabled, Start Workout Reminder disabled. Nothing really worked.

Couldn’t make the watch stop draining less than 3.5% per hour. Then finally I just gave in and addressed the elephant in the room, the one everyone is trying to not recognize as the major battery drain culprit, AOD.

With that disabled I could finally see that there isn’t anything wrong with my watch and it performs just as great or better (due to the bigger battery) than a Series 4.
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,401
19,639
UK
Yes I have Noise disabled, Hey Siri disabled, Start Workout Reminder disabled. Nothing really worked.

Couldn’t make the watch stop draining less than 3.5% per hour. Then finally I just gave in and addressed the elephant in the room, the one everyone is trying to not recognize as the major battery drain culprit, AOD.

With that disabled I could finally see that there isn’t anything wrong with my watch and it performs just as great or better (due to the bigger battery) than a Series 4.
This is the thing though people shouldn't need to be switching features off. Sadly it's come to that for some. Those still having issues I think just getting series 4 might be a better idea if you have to switch off AOD

mine I think drops about 3-3.5% an hour but for me that's fine as it will get me through all day easily. If I can take my watch off the charger at 7am and it still have 20-30% by the time I go to bed at 23.00-23:30 then it's done it's job for me.
 

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
This is the thing though people shouldn't need to be switching features off. Sadly it's come to that for some. Those still having issues I think just getting series 4 might be a better idea if you have to switch off AOD

mine I think drops about 3-3.5% an hour but for me that's fine as it will get me through all day easily. If I can take my watch off the charger at 7am and it still have 20-30% by the time I go to bed at 23.00-23:30 then it's done it's job for me.

Yes I agree. I am certainly disappointed in Series 5 because I got it for the AOD. But I went it with the expectation that I would get the same battery life as Series 4 because that is how Apple sold it. Which isn’t the case, you will end up with half of the battery life when compared to a Series 4 if you have AOD enabled. Now, Apple does says 18hours battery life and Series 5 definitely does more than 18 hours so they aren’t lying about that.

But just saying that if you prefer more battery life. Just disabling AOD will get it performing just as great as a Series 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Game 161

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,401
19,639
UK
Yes I agree. I am certainly disappointed in Series 5 because I got it for the AOD. But I went it with the expectation that I would get the same battery life as Series 4 because that is how Apple sold it. Which isn’t the case, you will end up with half of the battery life when compared to a Series 4 if you have AOD enabled. Now, Apple does says 18hours battery life and Series 5 definitely does more than 18 hours so they aren’t lying about that.

But just saying that if you prefer more battery life. Just disabling AOD will get it performing just as great as a Series 4.
This is likely why no sleep tracking was added this year as there's no way this would happen. Maybe next years we will see a big jump in battery life as it will need to for that to work. That said I like to watch my phone and watch at night no matter what the battery % is. I know not everybody likes to do this but for me that's my normal routine.
 

Apple_Robert

Contributor
Sep 21, 2012
34,529
50,123
In the middle of several books.
I just put my s5 on the charger at 20%. With Fall Detection temporarily turned off, and noise detection already off, I got 4:58 mixed usage and 1 day standby with my cellular version. That is the most I have seen thus far and don't think I will do better, unless I were to turn off cellular and a few other features. I don't think that is practical or prudent to do. While the s5 doesn't have the great battery life of my s3, I am happy with the results thus far.
 
Last edited:

spinedoc77

macrumors G4
Jun 11, 2009
11,414
5,291
To me it turns out the culprit is to be the AOD. With AOD I get between 3.5-4% battery drain per hour. Without AOD I get between 1-2% per hour. In the end this is just a glorified series 4. AOD isn’t worth the battery drain.

This makes the most sense to me. I'd like to see someone do a detailed comparison of battery life with AOD on and off. It's a shame as that is the selling point of the 5 over the 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ferretex

nph

macrumors 65816
Feb 9, 2005
1,045
214
I tried with and without AOD and for me it was about 1% difference from 3% to 2% or closer to it. Not enough to turn it off.
~2% from having
-AOD off
-Cellular off
-RTW off
-Siri off
-Lowest display intensity
-Almost no background app refresh

With this setup I reached >36 hours easily.

~3%
- AOD on
- RTW off
- Cellular on
- Siri off
- Display mid intensity
- Almost no background app refresh

Anyone have any other suggestions to turn on/off please let me know so I can try it out as well.

Coming from a S2 I am ok to have just 24h of active use. I can always turn everything except the clock off if I want to extend it but defeats the purpose of the clock, in my view....
I hope Apple will continue to reduce battery use in future 6.x.x releases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ferretex

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
I tried with and without AOD and for me it was about 1% difference from 3% to 2% or closer to it. Not enough to turn it off.
~2% from having
-AOD off
-Cellular off
-RTW off
-Siri off
-Lowest display intensity
-Almost no background app refresh

With this setup I reached >36 hours easily.

~3%
- AOD on
- RTW off
- Cellular on
- Siri off
- Display mid intensity
- Almost no background app refresh

Anyone have any other suggestions to turn on/off please let me know so I can try it out as well.

Coming from a S2 I am ok to have just 24h of active use. I can always turn everything except the clock off if I want to extend it but defeats the purpose of the clock, in my view....
I hope Apple will continue to reduce battery use in future 6.x.x releases.

I have background app refresh enabled for almost all apps. Display low intensity. Siri is on only raise to speak. Cellular is on. Raise to Wake is on.

Disabling AOD made a huge difference for me. At this point of the day I got 20% more battery and the gap only gets bigger as the day goes on. I think in the end it is about 40% more battery life when you let the watch run out of battery.
[automerge]1573515686[/automerge]
For the curious. I am at 10 hours standby. And it is at 75% at the moment.
 

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
My S4 with 6.1 is still consuming 10% per hour. Maybe even 12%. With no use at all. I've tried everything.

Check the diagnostic logs or contact Apple support for them to check them for you. It might be a process taking a lot of cpu usage.


As an example. My watch was draining battery a lot after pairing. I checked the diagnostic logs and found that Reminders was taking a lot of CPU. I went ahead and opened the reminders app and in fact it wasn’t syncing but after waiting for it to download all my tasks everything got fixed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mrako84

Vhpcampos

macrumors newbie
Nov 12, 2019
2
1
I have two S4 44mm, one is fine with the battery life more than 24h and the other one draining more than 15% per hour.

I tried a full restoration, pairing as a new device. Pairing with another phone and nothing worked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrako84

mrako84

macrumors newbie
Aug 2, 2008
11
3
I have unplugged my S4 at 8AM. Now it's 2:20PM and I'm at 26%. Notice: I have not moved from my desk at the office.
 

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
My biggest issue with AOD seems to come from the display brightness. For some reason when it goes into standby the watch gets brighter than when I wake it up. If I use my palm to put the watch in standby then the brightness lowers like it should. Seems to be a bug which hopefully they fix in the future.
 

Ack_

macrumors newbie
Oct 30, 2019
11
8
Buffalo
After unpairing/repairing the watch on Friday, as of yesterday my watch was back to its normal 12-15% drain per hour.

Looking at my logs, I received a trustedpeershelper.cup_resource file this morning where my CPU had run for 92s at 98% average cpu usage.

I can't for the life of me figure out what app is causing the issue. Anyone have an idea of how to read these errors? I took a snippet of the code and posted below:

Command: TrustedPeersHelper
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Identifier: com.apple.TrustedPeersHelper
Version: 1.0 (1)
PID: 317

Event: cpu usage
Action taken: none
CPU: 90 seconds cpu time over 92 seconds (98% cpu average), exceeding limit of 50% cpu over 180 seconds
CPU limit: 90s
Limit duration: 180s
CPU used: 90s
CPU duration: 92s
Duration: 91.94s
Duration Sampled: 10.21s
Steps: 13

Hardware model: Watch4,2
Active cpus: 2


Heaviest stack for the target process:
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 91600) [0x204c45d0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 53472) [0x204bb0e0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 121344) [0x204cba00]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 118384) [0x204cae70]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26216) [0x204b4668]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 61244) [0x2072cf3c]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 60384) [0x2072cbe0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331552) [0x216253a0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 353372) [0x2144245c]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331212) [0x2162524c]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 17712) [0x209be530]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 1247792) [0x20aeaa30]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1048032) [0x2aa7de0]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1046384) [0x2aa7770]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49032) [0x4613df88]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47416) [0x4613d938]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 74184) [0x461441c8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49228) [0x4613e04c]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 23312) [0x46137b10]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86456) [0x461471b8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 85488) [0x46146df0]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86068) [0x46147034]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47788) [0x4613daac]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86028) [0x4614700c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1087164) [0x2ab16bc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073860) [0x2aae2c4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1086284) [0x2ab134c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073828) [0x2aae2a4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 112728) [0x29c3858]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 588744) [0x2a37bc8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 38036) [0x245fc494]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 1169944) [0x24710a18]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591816) [0x2a387c8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 948172) [0x2a8f7cc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591248) [0x2a38590]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 962876) [0x2a9313c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 959400) [0x2a923a8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 596524) [0x2a39a2c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 35356) [0x44161a1c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 36096) [0x44161d00]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 104552) [0x44172868]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 106540) [0x4417302c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 100488) [0x44171888]
13 ??? (SecurityFoundation + 15728) [0x360dcd70]
13 ??? (Security + 660796) [0x2174653c]
13 ??? (Security + 660308) [0x21746354]
13 ??? (Security + 659496) [0x21746028]
13 ??? (Security + 606976) [0x21739300]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 145416) [0x20461808]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 288288) [0x20484620]
8 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 143612) [0x204610fc]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 120156) [0x2045b55c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 118316) [0x2045ae2c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 177296) [0x20469490]
1 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 158716) [0x20464bfc]


Powerstats for: TrustedPeersHelper (TrustedPeersHelper) [317]
UUID: A9C692DD-727D-390D-A5B5-7C0495F15B51
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Architecture: arm
Footprint: 46.45 MB
Start time: 2019-11-12 08:28:38 -0500
End time: 2019-11-12 08:28:49 -0500
Num samples: 13 (100%)
CPU Time: 10.064s
Primary state: 13 samples Non-Frontmost App, Non-Suppressed, User mode, Effective Thread QoS User Initiated, Requested Thread QoS User Initiated, Override Thread QoS Unspecified
User Activity: 0 samples Idle, 0 samples Active, 13 samples Unknown
Power Source: 0 samples on Battery, 0 samples on AC, 13 samples Unknown
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,401
19,639
UK
After unpairing/repairing the watch on Friday, as of yesterday my watch was back to its normal 12-15% drain per hour.

Looking at my logs, I received a trustedpeershelper.cup_resource file this morning where my CPU had run for 92s at 98% average cpu usage.

I can't for the life of me figure out what app is causing the issue. Anyone have an idea of how to read these errors? I took a snippet of the code and posted below:

Command: TrustedPeersHelper
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Identifier: com.apple.TrustedPeersHelper
Version: 1.0 (1)
PID: 317

Event: cpu usage
Action taken: none
CPU: 90 seconds cpu time over 92 seconds (98% cpu average), exceeding limit of 50% cpu over 180 seconds
CPU limit: 90s
Limit duration: 180s
CPU used: 90s
CPU duration: 92s
Duration: 91.94s
Duration Sampled: 10.21s
Steps: 13

Hardware model: Watch4,2
Active cpus: 2


Heaviest stack for the target process:
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 91600) [0x204c45d0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 53472) [0x204bb0e0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 121344) [0x204cba00]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 118384) [0x204cae70]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26216) [0x204b4668]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 61244) [0x2072cf3c]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 60384) [0x2072cbe0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331552) [0x216253a0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 353372) [0x2144245c]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331212) [0x2162524c]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 17712) [0x209be530]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 1247792) [0x20aeaa30]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1048032) [0x2aa7de0]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1046384) [0x2aa7770]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49032) [0x4613df88]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47416) [0x4613d938]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 74184) [0x461441c8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49228) [0x4613e04c]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 23312) [0x46137b10]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86456) [0x461471b8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 85488) [0x46146df0]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86068) [0x46147034]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47788) [0x4613daac]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86028) [0x4614700c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1087164) [0x2ab16bc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073860) [0x2aae2c4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1086284) [0x2ab134c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073828) [0x2aae2a4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 112728) [0x29c3858]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 588744) [0x2a37bc8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 38036) [0x245fc494]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 1169944) [0x24710a18]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591816) [0x2a387c8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 948172) [0x2a8f7cc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591248) [0x2a38590]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 962876) [0x2a9313c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 959400) [0x2a923a8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 596524) [0x2a39a2c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 35356) [0x44161a1c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 36096) [0x44161d00]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 104552) [0x44172868]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 106540) [0x4417302c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 100488) [0x44171888]
13 ??? (SecurityFoundation + 15728) [0x360dcd70]
13 ??? (Security + 660796) [0x2174653c]
13 ??? (Security + 660308) [0x21746354]
13 ??? (Security + 659496) [0x21746028]
13 ??? (Security + 606976) [0x21739300]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 145416) [0x20461808]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 288288) [0x20484620]
8 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 143612) [0x204610fc]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 120156) [0x2045b55c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 118316) [0x2045ae2c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 177296) [0x20469490]
1 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 158716) [0x20464bfc]


Powerstats for: TrustedPeersHelper (TrustedPeersHelper) [317]
UUID: A9C692DD-727D-390D-A5B5-7C0495F15B51
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Architecture: arm
Footprint: 46.45 MB
Start time: 2019-11-12 08:28:38 -0500
End time: 2019-11-12 08:28:49 -0500
Num samples: 13 (100%)
CPU Time: 10.064s
Primary state: 13 samples Non-Frontmost App, Non-Suppressed, User mode, Effective Thread QoS User Initiated, Requested Thread QoS User Initiated, Override Thread QoS Unspecified
User Activity: 0 samples Idle, 0 samples Active, 13 samples Unknown
Power Source: 0 samples on Battery, 0 samples on AC, 13 samples Unknown
I know when I had drain it was down to apple podcast app. reinstalled and it'd fine but I got a replacement watch. seems to be your best bet?
 

reixer

macrumors newbie
Sep 27, 2019
27
12
After unpairing/repairing the watch on Friday, as of yesterday my watch was back to its normal 12-15% drain per hour.

Looking at my logs, I received a trustedpeershelper.cup_resource file this morning where my CPU had run for 92s at 98% average cpu usage.

I can't for the life of me figure out what app is causing the issue. Anyone have an idea of how to read these errors? I took a snippet of the code and posted below:

Command: TrustedPeersHelper
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Identifier: com.apple.TrustedPeersHelper
Version: 1.0 (1)
PID: 317

Event: cpu usage
Action taken: none
CPU: 90 seconds cpu time over 92 seconds (98% cpu average), exceeding limit of 50% cpu over 180 seconds
CPU limit: 90s
Limit duration: 180s
CPU used: 90s
CPU duration: 92s
Duration: 91.94s
Duration Sampled: 10.21s
Steps: 13

Hardware model: Watch4,2
Active cpus: 2


Heaviest stack for the target process:
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 91600) [0x204c45d0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 53472) [0x204bb0e0]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 121344) [0x204cba00]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 50468) [0x204ba524]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 118384) [0x204cae70]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26216) [0x204b4668]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 61244) [0x2072cf3c]
13 ??? (libxpc.dylib + 60384) [0x2072cbe0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331552) [0x216253a0]
13 ??? (Foundation + 353372) [0x2144245c]
13 ??? (Foundation + 2331212) [0x2162524c]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 17712) [0x209be530]
13 ??? (CoreFoundation + 1247792) [0x20aeaa30]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1048032) [0x2aa7de0]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1046384) [0x2aa7770]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49032) [0x4613df88]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47416) [0x4613d938]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 74184) [0x461441c8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 49228) [0x4613e04c]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 23312) [0x46137b10]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86456) [0x461471b8]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 85488) [0x46146df0]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86068) [0x46147034]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 47788) [0x4613daac]
13 ??? (libswiftDispatch.dylib + 86028) [0x4614700c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1087164) [0x2ab16bc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073860) [0x2aae2c4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1086284) [0x2ab134c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 1073828) [0x2aae2a4]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 112728) [0x29c3858]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 588744) [0x2a37bc8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 38036) [0x245fc494]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 77496) [0x204c0eb8]
13 ??? (libdispatch.dylib + 26024) [0x204b45a8]
13 ??? (CoreData + 1169944) [0x24710a18]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591816) [0x2a387c8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 948172) [0x2a8f7cc]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 591248) [0x2a38590]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 962876) [0x2a9313c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 959400) [0x2a923a8]
13 ??? (TrustedPeersHelper + 596524) [0x2a39a2c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 35356) [0x44161a1c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 36096) [0x44161d00]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 104552) [0x44172868]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 106540) [0x4417302c]
13 ??? (TrustedPeers + 100488) [0x44171888]
13 ??? (SecurityFoundation + 15728) [0x360dcd70]
13 ??? (Security + 660796) [0x2174653c]
13 ??? (Security + 660308) [0x21746354]
13 ??? (Security + 659496) [0x21746028]
13 ??? (Security + 606976) [0x21739300]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 145416) [0x20461808]
13 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 288288) [0x20484620]
8 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 143612) [0x204610fc]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 120156) [0x2045b55c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 118316) [0x2045ae2c]
2 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 177296) [0x20469490]
1 ??? (libcorecrypto.dylib + 158716) [0x20464bfc]


Powerstats for: TrustedPeersHelper (TrustedPeersHelper) [317]
UUID: A9C692DD-727D-390D-A5B5-7C0495F15B51
Path: /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework/XPCServices/TrustedPeersHelper.xpc/TrustedPeersHelper
Architecture: arm
Footprint: 46.45 MB
Start time: 2019-11-12 08:28:38 -0500
End time: 2019-11-12 08:28:49 -0500
Num samples: 13 (100%)
CPU Time: 10.064s
Primary state: 13 samples Non-Frontmost App, Non-Suppressed, User mode, Effective Thread QoS User Initiated, Requested Thread QoS User Initiated, Override Thread QoS Unspecified
User Activity: 0 samples Idle, 0 samples Active, 13 samples Unknown
Power Source: 0 samples on Battery, 0 samples on AC, 13 samples Unknown


That seems to be related to an issue with your iCloud Keychain. Try using a different AppleID and see if you still have the issue. That is just only to isolate the issue of course. I know it isn’t viable to permanently change your AppleID.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ack_

Ack_

macrumors newbie
Oct 30, 2019
11
8
Buffalo
I know when I had drain it was down to apple podcast app. reinstalled and it'd fine but I got a replacement watch. seems to be your best bet?

Thanks for the input. I don't use the podcast app, so I know it can't be the issue.

That seems to be related to an issue with your iCloud Keychain. Try using a different AppleID and see if you still have the issue. That is just only to isolate the issue of course. I know it isn’t viable to permanently change your AppleID.

I tried to shut off my iCloud Keychain on my iPhone and after putting in my appleid password, the toggle switch turned back to on. This is odd in itself. Maybe this is part of the issue. . .
 

Rubberman

macrumors newbie
Oct 30, 2017
21
1
Im still on the Series 1 watch and my battery is dead by 5-6pm everyday. I take it off the charger about 6:30a and i dont use it except for time.
 

imagineadam

macrumors 68000
Jan 19, 2011
1,702
876
My series 2 (38mm) which is almost 3 years old now has the same battery life as always on 6.1. I end the day with 55-65% depending on if I do any workouts.
 

Nütztjanix

macrumors 68000
Jul 31, 2019
1,535
985
Germany
My series 2 (38mm) which is almost 3 years old now has the same battery life as always on 6.1. I end the day with 55-65% depending on if I do any workouts.
My October 2017 42mm LTE Series 3 is also doing very well on 6.1 - virtually no difference to prior watchOS versions and still up to 1,5 days, depending on usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imagineadam
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.