Why are we talking about him?The guy who tried to blow up a plane but failed to do so. Do you not consider him to be a terrorists just because he failed, just like you consider the Trump mob to not be terrorists just because they failed?
Why are we talking about him?The guy who tried to blow up a plane but failed to do so. Do you not consider him to be a terrorists just because he failed, just like you consider the Trump mob to not be terrorists just because they failed?
No, you were being disingenuous to drop an alarming image that was outside the scope of the discussion. It was an armed man at A capital. Just not the one n question. The Michigan event was cringey, but certainly peaceful. But it was not the event in question.The gentleman in question was an armed protestor. Be honorable and admit I fulfilled your ask.
Why are we talking about him?
Bad analogy.Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words
The world's leading online dictionary: English definitions, synonyms, word origins, example sentences, word games, and more. A trusted authority for 25+ years!www.dictionary.com
You know FULL well I'm talking about the second post I made. Why are you refusing to debate this in the proper fashion?No, you were being disingenuous to drop an alarming image that was outside the scope of the discussion. It was an armed man at A capital. Just not the one n question. The Michigan event was cringey, but certainly peaceful. But it was not the event in question.
You made a mistake because you were uninformed and made a far too quick google search. Likely for “capital riot guns” or something. It’s ok. You made a mistake and then You became informed by me. ?
One man, Lonnie Coffman, is facing multiple weapons charges after police say they found him in possession of five guns, eleven Molotov cocktails, a crossbow, smoke bombs and a stun gun.
Coffman was arrested only because police were investigating pipe bombs that were discovered near the Capitol at the Republican Party and Democratic Party headquarters and noticed one of the guns in his truck while securing the area.
Authorities have said they don't believe Coffman was behind the pipe bombs and have yet to identify a suspect.
In charging documents filed with the federal district court in D.C., police said they searched Coffman’s truck while sweeping the areas around the pipe bombs, finding the weapons along with hundreds of rounds of ammunition and a list of public officials and journalists that identified them as “good guys” and “bad guys.”
“In the end, this is a defendant with access to firearms and numerous other lethal weapons, dangerous incendiary mixtures creating napalm, who appears to have been motivated to conduct violence against our elected representatives,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing.
“The defendant brought these weapons to the immediate vicinity of the U.S. Capitol Building, and traveled to the area with two firearms on his person. The amount of weapons suggests an intent to provide them to others, as no one person could reasonably use so many at once,” they added.
Police seized alarming number of weapons on Capitol rioters, court documents show
Police have seized an alarming number of guns from President Trump’s supporters who descended on Washington, D.C., last week and stormed the Capitol in an effort to stop Congress’s…thehill.com
Debate what?You know FULL well I'm talking about the second post I made. Why are you refusing to debate this in the proper fashion?
Debate what?
You either were trying to mislead with that image, or were uninformed.
There is nothing to debate.
you asked if there were armed people at capitol, never mind those with zip ties wanting to take hostagesDebate what?
You either were trying to mislead with that image, or were uninformed.
There is nothing to debate.
Why? Because it forces you to acknowledge the intentions of the Trump mob that attacked the Capitol?Bad analogy.
on the contrary! he got away 4 years as prez without anyone getting proof positive that he wears diapers, thats a huge accomplishment imoAmazing how little work Trump accomplished
Pretty sure he also got to perfect his golf swing, he managed to grift himself a large sum of extra cash, and instigated the most violent uprising we've seen for many a year.on the contrary! he got away 4 years as prez without anyone getting proof positive that he wears diapers, thats a huge accomplishment imo
Simple, Michael Flynn, Mike Lindell, the Miramar coup and the election BS. Trump cheered and did not condemn their actions supporting a direct overthrow of our country by force. Actions spoke as one who could care less about our Constitution. What more do you need?You mean like taking over the healthcare industry, student loan program, establishing a department of education, complicit in the censoring of public discourse in social media, the forced closure of privately owned automoibile dealers, etc.?
Again I ask, what did laws/actions did Trump specifically do for you to call him a dictator?
Not true. They don’t have access to on-device data or keys, which by definition is “most” of my data.Unfortunately Apple does have the encryption keys to most of your data.
So what can one do about this?
Email, Reminders, Contacts, Calendar, Safari history should I keep on going?Not true. They don’t have access to on-device data or keys, which by definition is “most” of my data.
They do have the keys to iCloud data, and this is what can be handed over to law enforcement. That said, the most valuable iCloud data is email, which is likely collected through other governmental agencies as we’ve learned through Prism, etc. (just being matter of fact, not saying I’m happy about it).
True. And we know that Uncle Joe does wear diapers.on the contrary! he got away 4 years as prez without anyone getting proof positive that he wears diapers, thats a huge accomplishment imo
Carrying zip ties is not illegal.you asked if there were armed people at capitol, never mind those with zip ties wanting to take hostages
proof was provided
you ignore it for some reason?
Haha! Again, you don’t seem to know what the words “most” and “on-device” mean. These are pretty basic concepts. And as I’ve already stated literally in the message you just quoted, email is already collected by other government programs.Email, Reminders, Contacts, Calendar, Safari history should I keep on going?
So, yes it is true and you are wrong.
They are pretty basics concepts that seem to go over your head.Haha! Again, you don’t seem to know what the words “most” and “on-device” mean. These are pretty basic concepts. And as I’ve already stated literally in the message you just quoted, email is already collected by other government programs.
Glad MR has a robust “ignore” feature lol.
For the sake of the guy that got arrested carrying those plastic restraints, I hope his lawyers use that defense. I don't think it will go too well though.Carrying zip ties is not illegal.
No, but nothing surprises me anymore.For the sake of the guy that got arrested carrying those plastic restraints, I hope his lawyers use that defense. I don't think it will go too well though.
Fun fact......did you know you can get in trouble having a baseball bat in your car, despite it being legal to own, due to the intent of why you have it there?
Yes he did: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-disinfectants-covid-19/You need to look at the video of the press conferences. He did not say to inject disinfectant. Go take a look.
If Biden did this, you'd be all over it.Wow. The amount of misinformation and ignorance in this forum is staggering. I’m sorry, America.
This is disturbing no matter where you sit. Spying on members of Congress without just cause, would be a rather huge abuse of power.
The deaths are inflated, the tests are manipulated. Trump was right, it did go away very fast. It's a new strain of the Flu.If this is something you vaguely recall, I don't see how you can pass judgment on me comprehending the context of the statement.
And no, it was not the CDC. It was trump's national security advisor Robert O'Biran and his deputy national security advisor, Matt Pottinger, who briefed trump on January 28, 2020.
trump decided to play it down, not wanting to create a panic. “I still like playing it down, because I don't want to create a panic."
Imagine having your doctor withholding a cancer diagnosis from you, not wanting to create a panic.